Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1049300 |
Resumo: | Efficacy of pollination bags made of new nonwoven fabrics was compared with the traditional paper bags in sorghum during 2015 using three cultivars comprising BR007B (red seeded), SC283 (white seeded) and 1167048 hybrid with tannin (brown seeded). The five pollination bag treatments were: no bagging, traditional paper bag, paper bag plus plastic screen bag for extra bird protection, duraweb®SG2 polypropylene bag and duraweb®SG1 polyester bag. There was no bird damage on tannin hybrid but birds damaged bags to access grains of the other two varieties. Varieties and bag types differed significantly, and also showed significant interactions for panicle weight (at P<0.06), seed weight and average seed weight per panicle. The tannin hybrid was consistently a better performer for all traits regardless of bag type. The paper bags were the worst for bird damage. Duraweb® SG1 was the best performer for all traits including bird damage followed by duraweb®SG2. The joint regression analysis showed that BR007B performed consistently under all bag types with average response. On the other hand, SC283 improved its response with the increasing quality of bag type at an above average rate for panicle weight and seed traits. It was concluded that new nonwoven fabric bags could replace paper bags in providing better seed production potential and greater protection against bird damage. |
id |
EMBR_6ff6b23256d1ed11187e6e568fd4a79b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1049300 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.SorgoPolinizaçãoEfficacy of pollination bags made of new nonwoven fabrics was compared with the traditional paper bags in sorghum during 2015 using three cultivars comprising BR007B (red seeded), SC283 (white seeded) and 1167048 hybrid with tannin (brown seeded). The five pollination bag treatments were: no bagging, traditional paper bag, paper bag plus plastic screen bag for extra bird protection, duraweb®SG2 polypropylene bag and duraweb®SG1 polyester bag. There was no bird damage on tannin hybrid but birds damaged bags to access grains of the other two varieties. Varieties and bag types differed significantly, and also showed significant interactions for panicle weight (at P<0.06), seed weight and average seed weight per panicle. The tannin hybrid was consistently a better performer for all traits regardless of bag type. The paper bags were the worst for bird damage. Duraweb® SG1 was the best performer for all traits including bird damage followed by duraweb®SG2. The joint regression analysis showed that BR007B performed consistently under all bag types with average response. On the other hand, SC283 improved its response with the increasing quality of bag type at an above average rate for panicle weight and seed traits. It was concluded that new nonwoven fabric bags could replace paper bags in providing better seed production potential and greater protection against bird damage.ROBERT EUGENE SCHAFFERT, CNPMS.SCHAFFERT, R. E.VIRK, D. S.SENIOR, H.2016-07-20T11:11:11Z2016-07-20T11:11:11Z2016-07-2020162016-07-21T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, v. 8, n. 8, p. 126-137, Aug. 2016.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/104930010.5897/JPBCS2016.0580enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T01:38:24Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1049300Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T01:38:24falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T01:38:24Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest. |
title |
Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest. |
spellingShingle |
Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest. SCHAFFERT, R. E. Sorgo Polinização |
title_short |
Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest. |
title_full |
Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest. |
title_fullStr |
Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest. |
title_sort |
Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest. |
author |
SCHAFFERT, R. E. |
author_facet |
SCHAFFERT, R. E. VIRK, D. S. SENIOR, H. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
VIRK, D. S. SENIOR, H. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
ROBERT EUGENE SCHAFFERT, CNPMS. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SCHAFFERT, R. E. VIRK, D. S. SENIOR, H. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sorgo Polinização |
topic |
Sorgo Polinização |
description |
Efficacy of pollination bags made of new nonwoven fabrics was compared with the traditional paper bags in sorghum during 2015 using three cultivars comprising BR007B (red seeded), SC283 (white seeded) and 1167048 hybrid with tannin (brown seeded). The five pollination bag treatments were: no bagging, traditional paper bag, paper bag plus plastic screen bag for extra bird protection, duraweb®SG2 polypropylene bag and duraweb®SG1 polyester bag. There was no bird damage on tannin hybrid but birds damaged bags to access grains of the other two varieties. Varieties and bag types differed significantly, and also showed significant interactions for panicle weight (at P<0.06), seed weight and average seed weight per panicle. The tannin hybrid was consistently a better performer for all traits regardless of bag type. The paper bags were the worst for bird damage. Duraweb® SG1 was the best performer for all traits including bird damage followed by duraweb®SG2. The joint regression analysis showed that BR007B performed consistently under all bag types with average response. On the other hand, SC283 improved its response with the increasing quality of bag type at an above average rate for panicle weight and seed traits. It was concluded that new nonwoven fabric bags could replace paper bags in providing better seed production potential and greater protection against bird damage. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-20T11:11:11Z 2016-07-20T11:11:11Z 2016-07-20 2016 2016-07-21T11:11:11Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, v. 8, n. 8, p. 126-137, Aug. 2016. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1049300 10.5897/JPBCS2016.0580 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, v. 8, n. 8, p. 126-137, Aug. 2016. 10.5897/JPBCS2016.0580 |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1049300 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503424253886464 |