Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: BEZERRA, A. de O.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: NICACIO, A. C., MENEZES, G. R. de O., GOMES, R. da C., SILVA, L. O. C. da, ROCHA-FRIGONI, N. A. de S., MINGOTI, G. Z., LEÃO, B. C. da S., SILVA, E. V. da C. e., NOGUEIRA, E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1114169
Resumo: Due to the increasing use of in vitro embryo production (IVEP) and the importance of crossbreeding for beef production, pregnancy rates of Nelore recipients were evaluated following Fixed Time Embryo Transfer with fresh or vitrified IVEP embryos produced with Y-sorted sperm of Angus bulls (B. taurus) or Fixed Time Artificial Insemination using non-sorted sperm. For IVEP in Experiment 1, oocytes were obtained using Ovum Pick Up (OPU) (n = 84 embryos) or from ovaries from a slaughterhouse (SLAUGHTER, n = 66 embryos). In Experiment 2, with oocytes obtained by OPU, IVEP embryos were fresh (FRESH, n = 271) or after vitrification/warming (VITRIFIED, n=79) and PR was compared with FTAI (n=239). In Experiment 1, cleavage rates were 63.8% and 39.1% for OPU and SLAUGHTER groups, respectively (P=0.02), and blastocyst rates were 30.5% and 14.7%, respectively (P = 0.09). The PR was similar when considering the source of oocytes (OPU=35.7%; SLAUGHTER=25.8%; P = 0.17). In Experiment 2, there was no difference in PR for FRESH or VITRIFIED embryos (34.3% and 30.4%, respectively, P=0.72), but lesser than FTAI (47.7, P = 0.002). It is concluded that the IVEP with Y-sorted sperm associated with vitrification or embryos produced with oocytes from different sources did not affect PR when there was transfer of crossbred embryos into recipients, and can optimize large-scale application of IVEP technology; however, FTAI pregnancy rates with non-sex sorted sperm were greater.
id EMBR_a33d27e4408dfbd2e95210d36f8de857
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1114169
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.CrossbreedingInseminação ArtificialCriopreservaçãoEmbrião AnimalCultura In VitroCryopreservationEmbryo (animal)In vitro fertilizationArtificial inseminationDue to the increasing use of in vitro embryo production (IVEP) and the importance of crossbreeding for beef production, pregnancy rates of Nelore recipients were evaluated following Fixed Time Embryo Transfer with fresh or vitrified IVEP embryos produced with Y-sorted sperm of Angus bulls (B. taurus) or Fixed Time Artificial Insemination using non-sorted sperm. For IVEP in Experiment 1, oocytes were obtained using Ovum Pick Up (OPU) (n = 84 embryos) or from ovaries from a slaughterhouse (SLAUGHTER, n = 66 embryos). In Experiment 2, with oocytes obtained by OPU, IVEP embryos were fresh (FRESH, n = 271) or after vitrification/warming (VITRIFIED, n=79) and PR was compared with FTAI (n=239). In Experiment 1, cleavage rates were 63.8% and 39.1% for OPU and SLAUGHTER groups, respectively (P=0.02), and blastocyst rates were 30.5% and 14.7%, respectively (P = 0.09). The PR was similar when considering the source of oocytes (OPU=35.7%; SLAUGHTER=25.8%; P = 0.17). In Experiment 2, there was no difference in PR for FRESH or VITRIFIED embryos (34.3% and 30.4%, respectively, P=0.72), but lesser than FTAI (47.7, P = 0.002). It is concluded that the IVEP with Y-sorted sperm associated with vitrification or embryos produced with oocytes from different sources did not affect PR when there was transfer of crossbred embryos into recipients, and can optimize large-scale application of IVEP technology; however, FTAI pregnancy rates with non-sex sorted sperm were greater.ALEXANDRE DE OLIVEIRA BEZERRA, UFMS; ALESSANDRA CORALLO NICACIO, CNPGC; GILBERTO ROMEIRO DE OLIVEIRA MENEZE, CNPGC; RODRIGO DA COSTA GOMES, CNPGC; LUIZ OTAVIO CAMPOS DA SILVA, CNPGC; NATHÁLIA ALVES DE SOUZA ROCHA-FRIGONI, UNESP; GISELE ZOCCAL MINGOTI, UNESP; BEATRIZ CAETANO DA SILVA LEÃO, UNESP; ELIANE VIANNA DA COSTA E SILVA, UFMS; ERIKLIS NOGUEIRA, CPAP.BEZERRA, A. de O.NICACIO, A. C.MENEZES, G. R. de O.GOMES, R. da C.SILVA, L. O. C. daROCHA-FRIGONI, N. A. de S.MINGOTI, G. Z.LEÃO, B. C. da S.SILVA, E. V. da C. e.NOGUEIRA, E.2019-11-12T00:42:04Z2019-11-12T00:42:04Z2019-11-1120192020-01-06T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleAnimal Reproduction Science, v. 208, 2019.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/111416910.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.013enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2019-11-12T00:42:10Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1114169Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542019-11-12T00:42:10Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.
title Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.
spellingShingle Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.
BEZERRA, A. de O.
Crossbreeding
Inseminação Artificial
Criopreservação
Embrião Animal
Cultura In Vitro
Cryopreservation
Embryo (animal)
In vitro fertilization
Artificial insemination
title_short Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.
title_full Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.
title_fullStr Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.
title_sort Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves.
author BEZERRA, A. de O.
author_facet BEZERRA, A. de O.
NICACIO, A. C.
MENEZES, G. R. de O.
GOMES, R. da C.
SILVA, L. O. C. da
ROCHA-FRIGONI, N. A. de S.
MINGOTI, G. Z.
LEÃO, B. C. da S.
SILVA, E. V. da C. e.
NOGUEIRA, E.
author_role author
author2 NICACIO, A. C.
MENEZES, G. R. de O.
GOMES, R. da C.
SILVA, L. O. C. da
ROCHA-FRIGONI, N. A. de S.
MINGOTI, G. Z.
LEÃO, B. C. da S.
SILVA, E. V. da C. e.
NOGUEIRA, E.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv ALEXANDRE DE OLIVEIRA BEZERRA, UFMS; ALESSANDRA CORALLO NICACIO, CNPGC; GILBERTO ROMEIRO DE OLIVEIRA MENEZE, CNPGC; RODRIGO DA COSTA GOMES, CNPGC; LUIZ OTAVIO CAMPOS DA SILVA, CNPGC; NATHÁLIA ALVES DE SOUZA ROCHA-FRIGONI, UNESP; GISELE ZOCCAL MINGOTI, UNESP; BEATRIZ CAETANO DA SILVA LEÃO, UNESP; ELIANE VIANNA DA COSTA E SILVA, UFMS; ERIKLIS NOGUEIRA, CPAP.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv BEZERRA, A. de O.
NICACIO, A. C.
MENEZES, G. R. de O.
GOMES, R. da C.
SILVA, L. O. C. da
ROCHA-FRIGONI, N. A. de S.
MINGOTI, G. Z.
LEÃO, B. C. da S.
SILVA, E. V. da C. e.
NOGUEIRA, E.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Crossbreeding
Inseminação Artificial
Criopreservação
Embrião Animal
Cultura In Vitro
Cryopreservation
Embryo (animal)
In vitro fertilization
Artificial insemination
topic Crossbreeding
Inseminação Artificial
Criopreservação
Embrião Animal
Cultura In Vitro
Cryopreservation
Embryo (animal)
In vitro fertilization
Artificial insemination
description Due to the increasing use of in vitro embryo production (IVEP) and the importance of crossbreeding for beef production, pregnancy rates of Nelore recipients were evaluated following Fixed Time Embryo Transfer with fresh or vitrified IVEP embryos produced with Y-sorted sperm of Angus bulls (B. taurus) or Fixed Time Artificial Insemination using non-sorted sperm. For IVEP in Experiment 1, oocytes were obtained using Ovum Pick Up (OPU) (n = 84 embryos) or from ovaries from a slaughterhouse (SLAUGHTER, n = 66 embryos). In Experiment 2, with oocytes obtained by OPU, IVEP embryos were fresh (FRESH, n = 271) or after vitrification/warming (VITRIFIED, n=79) and PR was compared with FTAI (n=239). In Experiment 1, cleavage rates were 63.8% and 39.1% for OPU and SLAUGHTER groups, respectively (P=0.02), and blastocyst rates were 30.5% and 14.7%, respectively (P = 0.09). The PR was similar when considering the source of oocytes (OPU=35.7%; SLAUGHTER=25.8%; P = 0.17). In Experiment 2, there was no difference in PR for FRESH or VITRIFIED embryos (34.3% and 30.4%, respectively, P=0.72), but lesser than FTAI (47.7, P = 0.002). It is concluded that the IVEP with Y-sorted sperm associated with vitrification or embryos produced with oocytes from different sources did not affect PR when there was transfer of crossbred embryos into recipients, and can optimize large-scale application of IVEP technology; however, FTAI pregnancy rates with non-sex sorted sperm were greater.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-12T00:42:04Z
2019-11-12T00:42:04Z
2019-11-11
2019
2020-01-06T11:11:11Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Animal Reproduction Science, v. 208, 2019.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1114169
10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.013
identifier_str_mv Animal Reproduction Science, v. 208, 2019.
10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.013
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1114169
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1822721423603400704