Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Oliveira Bezerra, Alexandre
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Nicacio, Alessandra Corallo, de Oliveira Menezes, Gilberto Romeiro, da Costa Gomes, Rodrigo, da Silva, Luiz Otavio Campos, de Souza Rocha-Frigoni, Nathália Alves [UNESP], Mingoti, Gisele Zoccal [UNESP], da Silva Leão, Beatriz Caetano [UNESP], da Costa e Silva, Eliane Vianna, Nogueira, Ériklis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190442
Resumo: Due to the increasing use of in vitro embryo production (IVEP) and the importance of crossbreeding for beef production, pregnancy rates of Nelore recipients were evaluated following Fixed Time Embryo Transfer with fresh or vitrified IVEP embryos produced with Y-sorted sperm of Angus bulls (B. taurus) or Fixed Time Artificial Insemination using non-sorted sperm. For IVEP in Experiment 1, oocytes were obtained using Ovum Pick Up (OPU) (n = 84 embryos) or from ovaries from a slaughterhouse (SLAUGHTER, n = 66 embryos). In Experiment 2, with oocytes obtained by OPU, IVEP embryos were fresh (FRESH, n = 271) or after vitrification/warming (VITRIFIED, n = 79) and PR was compared with FTAI (n = 239). In Experiment 1, cleavage rates were 63.8% and 39.1% for OPU and SLAUGHTER groups, respectively (P = 0.02), and blastocyst rates were 30.5% and 14.7%, respectively (P = 0.09). The PR was similar when considering the source of oocytes (OPU = 35.7%; SLAUGHTER = 25.8%; P = 0.17). In Experiment 2, there was no difference in PR for FRESH or VITRIFIED embryos (34.3% and 30.4%, respectively, P = 0.72), but lesser than FTAI (47.7, P = 0.002). It is concluded that the IVEP with Y-sorted sperm associated with vitrification or embryos produced with oocytes from different sources did not affect PR when there was transfer of crossbred embryos into recipients, and can optimize large-scale application of IVEP technology; however, FTAI pregnancy rates with non-sex sorted sperm were greater.
id UNSP_fb015007d408cfeba69839bef158af2a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190442
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calvesCrossbreedingCryopreservationFTAIFTETNelore-AngusDue to the increasing use of in vitro embryo production (IVEP) and the importance of crossbreeding for beef production, pregnancy rates of Nelore recipients were evaluated following Fixed Time Embryo Transfer with fresh or vitrified IVEP embryos produced with Y-sorted sperm of Angus bulls (B. taurus) or Fixed Time Artificial Insemination using non-sorted sperm. For IVEP in Experiment 1, oocytes were obtained using Ovum Pick Up (OPU) (n = 84 embryos) or from ovaries from a slaughterhouse (SLAUGHTER, n = 66 embryos). In Experiment 2, with oocytes obtained by OPU, IVEP embryos were fresh (FRESH, n = 271) or after vitrification/warming (VITRIFIED, n = 79) and PR was compared with FTAI (n = 239). In Experiment 1, cleavage rates were 63.8% and 39.1% for OPU and SLAUGHTER groups, respectively (P = 0.02), and blastocyst rates were 30.5% and 14.7%, respectively (P = 0.09). The PR was similar when considering the source of oocytes (OPU = 35.7%; SLAUGHTER = 25.8%; P = 0.17). In Experiment 2, there was no difference in PR for FRESH or VITRIFIED embryos (34.3% and 30.4%, respectively, P = 0.72), but lesser than FTAI (47.7, P = 0.002). It is concluded that the IVEP with Y-sorted sperm associated with vitrification or embryos produced with oocytes from different sources did not affect PR when there was transfer of crossbred embryos into recipients, and can optimize large-scale application of IVEP technology; however, FTAI pregnancy rates with non-sex sorted sperm were greater.Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa AgropecuáriaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias UFMS, Av. Senador Felinto Muller, 2443Embrapa Gado de Corte, Av. Rádio Maia, 830, Vila PopularUNESP Araçatuba FMV, Rua Clovis Pestana, 793Embrapa Pantanal, Rua 21 de Setembro, 1880UNESP Araçatuba FMV, Rua Clovis Pestana, 793Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária: 02.13.14.011.00.00Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)de Oliveira Bezerra, AlexandreNicacio, Alessandra Corallode Oliveira Menezes, Gilberto Romeiroda Costa Gomes, Rodrigoda Silva, Luiz Otavio Camposde Souza Rocha-Frigoni, Nathália Alves [UNESP]Mingoti, Gisele Zoccal [UNESP]da Silva Leão, Beatriz Caetano [UNESP]da Costa e Silva, Eliane ViannaNogueira, Ériklis2019-10-06T17:13:23Z2019-10-06T17:13:23Z2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.013Animal Reproduction Science, v. 208.0378-4320http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19044210.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.0132-s2.0-85068075121Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnimal Reproduction Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T17:30:23Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190442Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-05-23T11:07:57.856068Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves
title Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves
spellingShingle Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves
de Oliveira Bezerra, Alexandre
Crossbreeding
Cryopreservation
FTAI
FTET
Nelore-Angus
title_short Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves
title_full Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves
title_fullStr Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves
title_sort Comparison between in vitro embryo production using Y-sorted sperm and timed artificial insemination with non-sorted sperm to produce crossbred calves
author de Oliveira Bezerra, Alexandre
author_facet de Oliveira Bezerra, Alexandre
Nicacio, Alessandra Corallo
de Oliveira Menezes, Gilberto Romeiro
da Costa Gomes, Rodrigo
da Silva, Luiz Otavio Campos
de Souza Rocha-Frigoni, Nathália Alves [UNESP]
Mingoti, Gisele Zoccal [UNESP]
da Silva Leão, Beatriz Caetano [UNESP]
da Costa e Silva, Eliane Vianna
Nogueira, Ériklis
author_role author
author2 Nicacio, Alessandra Corallo
de Oliveira Menezes, Gilberto Romeiro
da Costa Gomes, Rodrigo
da Silva, Luiz Otavio Campos
de Souza Rocha-Frigoni, Nathália Alves [UNESP]
Mingoti, Gisele Zoccal [UNESP]
da Silva Leão, Beatriz Caetano [UNESP]
da Costa e Silva, Eliane Vianna
Nogueira, Ériklis
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Oliveira Bezerra, Alexandre
Nicacio, Alessandra Corallo
de Oliveira Menezes, Gilberto Romeiro
da Costa Gomes, Rodrigo
da Silva, Luiz Otavio Campos
de Souza Rocha-Frigoni, Nathália Alves [UNESP]
Mingoti, Gisele Zoccal [UNESP]
da Silva Leão, Beatriz Caetano [UNESP]
da Costa e Silva, Eliane Vianna
Nogueira, Ériklis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Crossbreeding
Cryopreservation
FTAI
FTET
Nelore-Angus
topic Crossbreeding
Cryopreservation
FTAI
FTET
Nelore-Angus
description Due to the increasing use of in vitro embryo production (IVEP) and the importance of crossbreeding for beef production, pregnancy rates of Nelore recipients were evaluated following Fixed Time Embryo Transfer with fresh or vitrified IVEP embryos produced with Y-sorted sperm of Angus bulls (B. taurus) or Fixed Time Artificial Insemination using non-sorted sperm. For IVEP in Experiment 1, oocytes were obtained using Ovum Pick Up (OPU) (n = 84 embryos) or from ovaries from a slaughterhouse (SLAUGHTER, n = 66 embryos). In Experiment 2, with oocytes obtained by OPU, IVEP embryos were fresh (FRESH, n = 271) or after vitrification/warming (VITRIFIED, n = 79) and PR was compared with FTAI (n = 239). In Experiment 1, cleavage rates were 63.8% and 39.1% for OPU and SLAUGHTER groups, respectively (P = 0.02), and blastocyst rates were 30.5% and 14.7%, respectively (P = 0.09). The PR was similar when considering the source of oocytes (OPU = 35.7%; SLAUGHTER = 25.8%; P = 0.17). In Experiment 2, there was no difference in PR for FRESH or VITRIFIED embryos (34.3% and 30.4%, respectively, P = 0.72), but lesser than FTAI (47.7, P = 0.002). It is concluded that the IVEP with Y-sorted sperm associated with vitrification or embryos produced with oocytes from different sources did not affect PR when there was transfer of crossbred embryos into recipients, and can optimize large-scale application of IVEP technology; however, FTAI pregnancy rates with non-sex sorted sperm were greater.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T17:13:23Z
2019-10-06T17:13:23Z
2019-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.013
Animal Reproduction Science, v. 208.
0378-4320
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190442
10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.013
2-s2.0-85068075121
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190442
identifier_str_mv Animal Reproduction Science, v. 208.
0378-4320
10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.013
2-s2.0-85068075121
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Animal Reproduction Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803045774102102016