Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SANTOS, V. S.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: MARTINS FILHO, S., RESENDE, M. D. V. de, AZEVEDO, C. F., LOPES, P. S., GUIMARAES, S. E. F., GLORIA, L. S., SILVA, F. F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.October.19.5
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1030248
Resumo: The aim of this study was to compare genomic selection methodologies using a linear mixed model and the Cox survival model. We used data from an F2 population of pigs, in which the response variable was the time in days from birth to the culling of the animal and the covariates were 238 markers [237 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) plus the halothane gene]. The data were corrected for fixed effects, and the accuracy of the method was determined based on the correlation of the ranks of predicted genomic breeding values (GBVs) in both models with the corrected phenotypic values. The analysis was repeated with a subset of SNP markers with largest absolute effects. The results were in agreement with the GBV prediction and the estimation of marker effects for both models for uncensored data and for normality. However, when considering censored data, the Cox model with a normal random effect (S1) was more appropriate. Since there was no agreement between the linear mixed model and the imputed data (L2) for the prediction of genomic values and the estimation of marker effects, the model S1 was considered superior as it took into account the latent variable and the censored data. Marker selection increased correlations between the ranks of predicted GBVs by the linear and Cox frailty models and the corrected phenotypic values, and 120 markers were required to increase the predictive ability for the characteristic analyzed.
id EMBR_d3de6c6609ab5dc06b34e72ec9e7fb7d
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1030248
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.Dado censuradoModelo mixtoCensured dataMixed modelPolimorfismopolymorphismThe aim of this study was to compare genomic selection methodologies using a linear mixed model and the Cox survival model. We used data from an F2 population of pigs, in which the response variable was the time in days from birth to the culling of the animal and the covariates were 238 markers [237 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) plus the halothane gene]. The data were corrected for fixed effects, and the accuracy of the method was determined based on the correlation of the ranks of predicted genomic breeding values (GBVs) in both models with the corrected phenotypic values. The analysis was repeated with a subset of SNP markers with largest absolute effects. The results were in agreement with the GBV prediction and the estimation of marker effects for both models for uncensored data and for normality. However, when considering censored data, the Cox model with a normal random effect (S1) was more appropriate. Since there was no agreement between the linear mixed model and the imputed data (L2) for the prediction of genomic values and the estimation of marker effects, the model S1 was considered superior as it took into account the latent variable and the censored data. Marker selection increased correlations between the ranks of predicted GBVs by the linear and Cox frailty models and the corrected phenotypic values, and 120 markers were required to increase the predictive ability for the characteristic analyzed.V. S. SANTOS, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; S. MARTINS FILHO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF; C. F. AZEVEDO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; P. S. LOPES, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; S. E. F. GUIMARAES, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; L. S. GLORIA, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; F. F. SILVA, Universidade Federal de Viçosa.SANTOS, V. S.MARTINS FILHO, S.RESENDE, M. D. V. deAZEVEDO, C. F.LOPES, P. S.GUIMARAES, S. E. F.GLORIA, L. S.SILVA, F. F.2018-01-03T23:17:47Z2018-01-03T23:17:47Z2015-12-0220152018-01-03T23:17:47Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleGenetics and Molecular Research, Ribeirão Preto, v. 14, n. 4, p. 12616-12627, 2015.http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.October.19.5http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1030248enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2018-01-03T23:17:54Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1030248Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542018-01-03T23:17:54falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542018-01-03T23:17:54Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.
title Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.
spellingShingle Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.
SANTOS, V. S.
Dado censurado
Modelo mixto
Censured data
Mixed model
Polimorfismo
polymorphism
title_short Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.
title_full Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.
title_fullStr Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.
title_full_unstemmed Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.
title_sort Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.
author SANTOS, V. S.
author_facet SANTOS, V. S.
MARTINS FILHO, S.
RESENDE, M. D. V. de
AZEVEDO, C. F.
LOPES, P. S.
GUIMARAES, S. E. F.
GLORIA, L. S.
SILVA, F. F.
author_role author
author2 MARTINS FILHO, S.
RESENDE, M. D. V. de
AZEVEDO, C. F.
LOPES, P. S.
GUIMARAES, S. E. F.
GLORIA, L. S.
SILVA, F. F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv V. S. SANTOS, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; S. MARTINS FILHO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF; C. F. AZEVEDO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; P. S. LOPES, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; S. E. F. GUIMARAES, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; L. S. GLORIA, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; F. F. SILVA, Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SANTOS, V. S.
MARTINS FILHO, S.
RESENDE, M. D. V. de
AZEVEDO, C. F.
LOPES, P. S.
GUIMARAES, S. E. F.
GLORIA, L. S.
SILVA, F. F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dado censurado
Modelo mixto
Censured data
Mixed model
Polimorfismo
polymorphism
topic Dado censurado
Modelo mixto
Censured data
Mixed model
Polimorfismo
polymorphism
description The aim of this study was to compare genomic selection methodologies using a linear mixed model and the Cox survival model. We used data from an F2 population of pigs, in which the response variable was the time in days from birth to the culling of the animal and the covariates were 238 markers [237 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) plus the halothane gene]. The data were corrected for fixed effects, and the accuracy of the method was determined based on the correlation of the ranks of predicted genomic breeding values (GBVs) in both models with the corrected phenotypic values. The analysis was repeated with a subset of SNP markers with largest absolute effects. The results were in agreement with the GBV prediction and the estimation of marker effects for both models for uncensored data and for normality. However, when considering censored data, the Cox model with a normal random effect (S1) was more appropriate. Since there was no agreement between the linear mixed model and the imputed data (L2) for the prediction of genomic values and the estimation of marker effects, the model S1 was considered superior as it took into account the latent variable and the censored data. Marker selection increased correlations between the ranks of predicted GBVs by the linear and Cox frailty models and the corrected phenotypic values, and 120 markers were required to increase the predictive ability for the characteristic analyzed.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-02
2015
2018-01-03T23:17:47Z
2018-01-03T23:17:47Z
2018-01-03T23:17:47Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Genetics and Molecular Research, Ribeirão Preto, v. 14, n. 4, p. 12616-12627, 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.October.19.5
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1030248
identifier_str_mv Genetics and Molecular Research, Ribeirão Preto, v. 14, n. 4, p. 12616-12627, 2015.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.October.19.5
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1030248
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503447207215104