Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: HUNGRIA, M.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: MENDES, I. C., NAKATANI, A. S., REIS-JUNIOR, F. B. dos, MORAIS, J. Z., OLIVEIRA, M. C. N. de, FERNANDES, M. F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/977903
Resumo: The commercial use of glyphosate-resistant (also known as Roundup Ready®, GR or RR) soybean wasinitiated in 1996 in the United States. This genetically engineered crop now occupies 75.4 million haworldwide, 20.6 million of which are in Brazil where it occupies 86% of the total area cropped with thelegume. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is critical for economic sustainability of soybean in Brazil;therefore, to investigate the effects of the RR gene?using pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars?and herbi-cides on BNF, we conducted an extensive series of field experiments for three cropping seasons. Theexperiments were set up at six sites with five treatments, three pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars, andsix replicates. The treatments consisted of: (T1) RR soybean + glyphosate; (T2) RR soybean + conventionalherbicides; (T3) conventional parental soybean + conventional herbicides; (T4) RR soybean + hand weedcontrol; and (T5) conventional parental soybean + hand weed control. Parameters of nodulation, plantbiomass production, total N and ureide-N were evaluated at the V4 and R2 stages of growth, and grainyield and total N in grains were evaluated at crop maturity. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, analysesof contrasts, and multivariate analyses considering a pool of six variables, denominated as symbioticefficiency (SyEf). The comparison of the pairs of non-transgenic and RR soybean cultivars showed thatthe transgenic trait negatively affected some BNF variables, but over a three-year period these effectshad no significant impact on soybean grain yield. No consistent differences between glyphosate andconventional herbicide application were observed on BNF-associated parameters. When compared toconventional soybean and conventional herbicides, weed-management strategy with RR soybean andglyphosate did not affect symbiotic efficiency. In addition, at three sites, grain yields increased in thetreatments with glyphosate and RR soybean over the three cropping seasons. The results from the multi-variate analyses indicate that BNF and yield parameters were more affected by location, cropping seasonand cultivar than by the transgene, herbicides, or weed-management strategy. Despite the lack of effectsof the transgene on yield in the three-year period, longer-term effects on BNF and N accumulation shouldbe monitored.
id EMBR_e0a7854b30001ef2cca0f5751a1ebc1d
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/977903
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.SojaHerbicidaFixação de nitrogênioSoybeansHerbicidesNitrogen fixationThe commercial use of glyphosate-resistant (also known as Roundup Ready®, GR or RR) soybean wasinitiated in 1996 in the United States. This genetically engineered crop now occupies 75.4 million haworldwide, 20.6 million of which are in Brazil where it occupies 86% of the total area cropped with thelegume. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is critical for economic sustainability of soybean in Brazil;therefore, to investigate the effects of the RR gene?using pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars?and herbi-cides on BNF, we conducted an extensive series of field experiments for three cropping seasons. Theexperiments were set up at six sites with five treatments, three pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars, andsix replicates. The treatments consisted of: (T1) RR soybean + glyphosate; (T2) RR soybean + conventionalherbicides; (T3) conventional parental soybean + conventional herbicides; (T4) RR soybean + hand weedcontrol; and (T5) conventional parental soybean + hand weed control. Parameters of nodulation, plantbiomass production, total N and ureide-N were evaluated at the V4 and R2 stages of growth, and grainyield and total N in grains were evaluated at crop maturity. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, analysesof contrasts, and multivariate analyses considering a pool of six variables, denominated as symbioticefficiency (SyEf). The comparison of the pairs of non-transgenic and RR soybean cultivars showed thatthe transgenic trait negatively affected some BNF variables, but over a three-year period these effectshad no significant impact on soybean grain yield. No consistent differences between glyphosate andconventional herbicide application were observed on BNF-associated parameters. When compared toconventional soybean and conventional herbicides, weed-management strategy with RR soybean andglyphosate did not affect symbiotic efficiency. In addition, at three sites, grain yields increased in thetreatments with glyphosate and RR soybean over the three cropping seasons. The results from the multi-variate analyses indicate that BNF and yield parameters were more affected by location, cropping seasonand cultivar than by the transgene, herbicides, or weed-management strategy. Despite the lack of effectsof the transgene on yield in the three-year period, longer-term effects on BNF and N accumulation shouldbe monitored.MARIANGELA HUNGRIA DA CUNHA, CNPSO; IEDA DE CARVALHO MENDES, CPAC; ANDRÉ SHIGUEYOSHI NAKATANI, CNPq - pós-doutorado; FABIO BUENO DOS REIS JUNIOR, CPAC; JOSE ZUCCA MORAIS, CNPSO; MARIA CRISTINA NEVES DE OLIVEIRA, CNPSO; MARCELO FERREIRA FERNANDES, CPATC.HUNGRIA, M.MENDES, I. C.NAKATANI, A. S.REIS-JUNIOR, F. B. dosMORAIS, J. Z.OLIVEIRA, M. C. N. deFERNANDES, M. F.2014-01-29T11:11:11Z2014-01-29T11:11:11Z2014-01-2920142015-01-06T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleField Crops Research, v. 158, p. 43-54, 2014.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/97790310.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.022enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T00:57:50Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/977903Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T00:57:50falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T00:57:50Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.
title Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.
spellingShingle Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.
HUNGRIA, M.
Soja
Herbicida
Fixação de nitrogênio
Soybeans
Herbicides
Nitrogen fixation
title_short Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.
title_full Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.
title_fullStr Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.
title_sort Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.
author HUNGRIA, M.
author_facet HUNGRIA, M.
MENDES, I. C.
NAKATANI, A. S.
REIS-JUNIOR, F. B. dos
MORAIS, J. Z.
OLIVEIRA, M. C. N. de
FERNANDES, M. F.
author_role author
author2 MENDES, I. C.
NAKATANI, A. S.
REIS-JUNIOR, F. B. dos
MORAIS, J. Z.
OLIVEIRA, M. C. N. de
FERNANDES, M. F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv MARIANGELA HUNGRIA DA CUNHA, CNPSO; IEDA DE CARVALHO MENDES, CPAC; ANDRÉ SHIGUEYOSHI NAKATANI, CNPq - pós-doutorado; FABIO BUENO DOS REIS JUNIOR, CPAC; JOSE ZUCCA MORAIS, CNPSO; MARIA CRISTINA NEVES DE OLIVEIRA, CNPSO; MARCELO FERREIRA FERNANDES, CPATC.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv HUNGRIA, M.
MENDES, I. C.
NAKATANI, A. S.
REIS-JUNIOR, F. B. dos
MORAIS, J. Z.
OLIVEIRA, M. C. N. de
FERNANDES, M. F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Soja
Herbicida
Fixação de nitrogênio
Soybeans
Herbicides
Nitrogen fixation
topic Soja
Herbicida
Fixação de nitrogênio
Soybeans
Herbicides
Nitrogen fixation
description The commercial use of glyphosate-resistant (also known as Roundup Ready®, GR or RR) soybean wasinitiated in 1996 in the United States. This genetically engineered crop now occupies 75.4 million haworldwide, 20.6 million of which are in Brazil where it occupies 86% of the total area cropped with thelegume. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is critical for economic sustainability of soybean in Brazil;therefore, to investigate the effects of the RR gene?using pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars?and herbi-cides on BNF, we conducted an extensive series of field experiments for three cropping seasons. Theexperiments were set up at six sites with five treatments, three pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars, andsix replicates. The treatments consisted of: (T1) RR soybean + glyphosate; (T2) RR soybean + conventionalherbicides; (T3) conventional parental soybean + conventional herbicides; (T4) RR soybean + hand weedcontrol; and (T5) conventional parental soybean + hand weed control. Parameters of nodulation, plantbiomass production, total N and ureide-N were evaluated at the V4 and R2 stages of growth, and grainyield and total N in grains were evaluated at crop maturity. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, analysesof contrasts, and multivariate analyses considering a pool of six variables, denominated as symbioticefficiency (SyEf). The comparison of the pairs of non-transgenic and RR soybean cultivars showed thatthe transgenic trait negatively affected some BNF variables, but over a three-year period these effectshad no significant impact on soybean grain yield. No consistent differences between glyphosate andconventional herbicide application were observed on BNF-associated parameters. When compared toconventional soybean and conventional herbicides, weed-management strategy with RR soybean andglyphosate did not affect symbiotic efficiency. In addition, at three sites, grain yields increased in thetreatments with glyphosate and RR soybean over the three cropping seasons. The results from the multi-variate analyses indicate that BNF and yield parameters were more affected by location, cropping seasonand cultivar than by the transgene, herbicides, or weed-management strategy. Despite the lack of effectsof the transgene on yield in the three-year period, longer-term effects on BNF and N accumulation shouldbe monitored.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-29T11:11:11Z
2014-01-29T11:11:11Z
2014-01-29
2014
2015-01-06T11:11:11Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Field Crops Research, v. 158, p. 43-54, 2014.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/977903
10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.022
identifier_str_mv Field Crops Research, v. 158, p. 43-54, 2014.
10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.022
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/977903
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503385977716736