The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Filho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da EMERJ (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387
Resumo: The article proposes to face the need of remodeling the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 to include, in the article 103 of its text, the active legitimacy of the Federal General Public Defender to propose actions aimed at abstract control of constitutionality towards the Federal Supreme Court and remove a law or normative act from the legal system. From the demonstration that access to justice is a fundamental right and that the Public Defender's Office, especially in the last two decades, was reconfigured to detach itself from the idea of an action linked only to the beneficiary's economic situation, the text proposes, as way of deepening the redemocratization process, a healthy expansion of the list of legitimate assets. Throughout the article, the main arguments supporting the conclusion that the Constitutional Amendment Proposals aimed at recognizing the possibility of the Public Defender's Office acting in the abstract control of constitutionality must be approved in the shortest time to correct an imperfection of the current system, still shaped by a logic that no longer holds.
id EMERJ-2_4a3a82dc81fa1bdda130475eb928243a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/387
network_acronym_str EMERJ-2
network_name_str Revista da EMERJ (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender systemA democratização da jurisdição constitucional por meio da Defensoria Públicadefensoria públicajurisdiçãoconstitucionaldemocraciapublic defensejurisdictionconstitutionaldemocracyThe article proposes to face the need of remodeling the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 to include, in the article 103 of its text, the active legitimacy of the Federal General Public Defender to propose actions aimed at abstract control of constitutionality towards the Federal Supreme Court and remove a law or normative act from the legal system. From the demonstration that access to justice is a fundamental right and that the Public Defender's Office, especially in the last two decades, was reconfigured to detach itself from the idea of an action linked only to the beneficiary's economic situation, the text proposes, as way of deepening the redemocratization process, a healthy expansion of the list of legitimate assets. Throughout the article, the main arguments supporting the conclusion that the Constitutional Amendment Proposals aimed at recognizing the possibility of the Public Defender's Office acting in the abstract control of constitutionality must be approved in the shortest time to correct an imperfection of the current system, still shaped by a logic that no longer holds.O artigo se propõe a enfrentar a necessidade de que a Constituição Federal Brasileira de 1988 passe por um processo de reforma que inclua, no artigo 103 do seu texto, a legitimidade ativa do Defensor Público Geral Federal para propor as ações dispostas ao controle abstrato de constitucionalidade perante o Supremo Tribunal Federal para afastar uma lei ou ato normativo do ordenamento jurídico. A partir da demonstração de que o acesso à justiça é um direito fundamental e que a Defensoria Pública, especialmente nas última duas décadas, foi reconfigurada para desprender-se da ideia de uma atuação ligada apenas a situação econômica do beneficiário, o texto propõe, como forma de aprofundamento do processo de redemocratização, a salutar ampliação do rol de legitimados ativos. Ao longo do artigo serão apresentados os principais argumentos que apoiam a conclusão de que as Propostas de Emenda à Constituição dirigidas a reconhecer a possibilidade da Defensoria Pública atuar no controle abstrato de constitucionalidade devem ser aprovadas no mais curto espaço de tempo para corrigir uma imperfeição do atual sistema, ainda moldado sob uma lógica que não mais se sustenta.Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 1 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 116-1432236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387/175Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFilho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta2023-12-12T13:06:12Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/387Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-12-12T13:06:12Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system
A democratização da jurisdição constitucional por meio da Defensoria Pública
title The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system
spellingShingle The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system
Filho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta
defensoria pública
jurisdição
constitucional
democracia
public defense
jurisdiction
constitutional
democracy
title_short The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system
title_full The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system
title_fullStr The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system
title_full_unstemmed The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system
title_sort The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system
author Filho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta
author_facet Filho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Filho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv defensoria pública
jurisdição
constitucional
democracia
public defense
jurisdiction
constitutional
democracy
topic defensoria pública
jurisdição
constitucional
democracia
public defense
jurisdiction
constitutional
democracy
description The article proposes to face the need of remodeling the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 to include, in the article 103 of its text, the active legitimacy of the Federal General Public Defender to propose actions aimed at abstract control of constitutionality towards the Federal Supreme Court and remove a law or normative act from the legal system. From the demonstration that access to justice is a fundamental right and that the Public Defender's Office, especially in the last two decades, was reconfigured to detach itself from the idea of an action linked only to the beneficiary's economic situation, the text proposes, as way of deepening the redemocratization process, a healthy expansion of the list of legitimate assets. Throughout the article, the main arguments supporting the conclusion that the Constitutional Amendment Proposals aimed at recognizing the possibility of the Public Defender's Office acting in the abstract control of constitutionality must be approved in the shortest time to correct an imperfection of the current system, still shaped by a logic that no longer holds.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387
url https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387/175
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 1 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 116-143
2236-8957
1415-4951
reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)
instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron:EMERJ
instname_str Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron_str EMERJ
institution EMERJ
reponame_str Revista da EMERJ (Online)
collection Revista da EMERJ (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br
_version_ 1797041854631378944