The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387 |
Resumo: | The article proposes to face the need of remodeling the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 to include, in the article 103 of its text, the active legitimacy of the Federal General Public Defender to propose actions aimed at abstract control of constitutionality towards the Federal Supreme Court and remove a law or normative act from the legal system. From the demonstration that access to justice is a fundamental right and that the Public Defender's Office, especially in the last two decades, was reconfigured to detach itself from the idea of an action linked only to the beneficiary's economic situation, the text proposes, as way of deepening the redemocratization process, a healthy expansion of the list of legitimate assets. Throughout the article, the main arguments supporting the conclusion that the Constitutional Amendment Proposals aimed at recognizing the possibility of the Public Defender's Office acting in the abstract control of constitutionality must be approved in the shortest time to correct an imperfection of the current system, still shaped by a logic that no longer holds. |
id |
EMERJ-2_4a3a82dc81fa1bdda130475eb928243a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/387 |
network_acronym_str |
EMERJ-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender systemA democratização da jurisdição constitucional por meio da Defensoria Públicadefensoria públicajurisdiçãoconstitucionaldemocraciapublic defensejurisdictionconstitutionaldemocracyThe article proposes to face the need of remodeling the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 to include, in the article 103 of its text, the active legitimacy of the Federal General Public Defender to propose actions aimed at abstract control of constitutionality towards the Federal Supreme Court and remove a law or normative act from the legal system. From the demonstration that access to justice is a fundamental right and that the Public Defender's Office, especially in the last two decades, was reconfigured to detach itself from the idea of an action linked only to the beneficiary's economic situation, the text proposes, as way of deepening the redemocratization process, a healthy expansion of the list of legitimate assets. Throughout the article, the main arguments supporting the conclusion that the Constitutional Amendment Proposals aimed at recognizing the possibility of the Public Defender's Office acting in the abstract control of constitutionality must be approved in the shortest time to correct an imperfection of the current system, still shaped by a logic that no longer holds.O artigo se propõe a enfrentar a necessidade de que a Constituição Federal Brasileira de 1988 passe por um processo de reforma que inclua, no artigo 103 do seu texto, a legitimidade ativa do Defensor Público Geral Federal para propor as ações dispostas ao controle abstrato de constitucionalidade perante o Supremo Tribunal Federal para afastar uma lei ou ato normativo do ordenamento jurídico. A partir da demonstração de que o acesso à justiça é um direito fundamental e que a Defensoria Pública, especialmente nas última duas décadas, foi reconfigurada para desprender-se da ideia de uma atuação ligada apenas a situação econômica do beneficiário, o texto propõe, como forma de aprofundamento do processo de redemocratização, a salutar ampliação do rol de legitimados ativos. Ao longo do artigo serão apresentados os principais argumentos que apoiam a conclusão de que as Propostas de Emenda à Constituição dirigidas a reconhecer a possibilidade da Defensoria Pública atuar no controle abstrato de constitucionalidade devem ser aprovadas no mais curto espaço de tempo para corrigir uma imperfeição do atual sistema, ainda moldado sob uma lógica que não mais se sustenta.Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 1 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 116-1432236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387/175Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFilho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta2023-12-12T13:06:12Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/387Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-12-12T13:06:12Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system A democratização da jurisdição constitucional por meio da Defensoria Pública |
title |
The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system |
spellingShingle |
The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system Filho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta defensoria pública jurisdição constitucional democracia public defense jurisdiction constitutional democracy |
title_short |
The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system |
title_full |
The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system |
title_fullStr |
The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system |
title_full_unstemmed |
The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system |
title_sort |
The democratization of constitutional jurisdiction through the Public Defender system |
author |
Filho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta |
author_facet |
Filho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Filho, Francisco Alves da Cunha Horta |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
defensoria pública jurisdição constitucional democracia public defense jurisdiction constitutional democracy |
topic |
defensoria pública jurisdição constitucional democracia public defense jurisdiction constitutional democracy |
description |
The article proposes to face the need of remodeling the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 to include, in the article 103 of its text, the active legitimacy of the Federal General Public Defender to propose actions aimed at abstract control of constitutionality towards the Federal Supreme Court and remove a law or normative act from the legal system. From the demonstration that access to justice is a fundamental right and that the Public Defender's Office, especially in the last two decades, was reconfigured to detach itself from the idea of an action linked only to the beneficiary's economic situation, the text proposes, as way of deepening the redemocratization process, a healthy expansion of the list of legitimate assets. Throughout the article, the main arguments supporting the conclusion that the Constitutional Amendment Proposals aimed at recognizing the possibility of the Public Defender's Office acting in the abstract control of constitutionality must be approved in the shortest time to correct an imperfection of the current system, still shaped by a logic that no longer holds. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387 |
url |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/387/175 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 1 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 116-143 2236-8957 1415-4951 reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online) instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) instacron:EMERJ |
instname_str |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
instacron_str |
EMERJ |
institution |
EMERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
collection |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br |
_version_ |
1797041854631378944 |