WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217 |
Resumo: | This work aims to demonstrate the imprescindibility of the effectiveness of the Judge of Guarantees in the procedural legal system. The investigation is based on the following problem: There is a resistance of acceptance to the Judge of Guarantees, reminiscent of an authoritarian period of validity of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in order to allow the maintenance of the inquisitorial system, through which, the broad right of defense remains absolutely impaired in the face of the direction of the collection of evidence in the phase of criminal prosecution by the same judge responsible for the trial of the case. It is upheld the absence of any unconstitutionality of Law No. 13,964/19. It is brought with the present text, research led by the German professor Bernd Schünemann, based on the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, in order to demonstrate the degree of involvement of the judge when he is responsible for the collection of evidence, directly affecting his impartiality. |
id |
EMERJ-2_6c6e233a3ea4ffe8a153fd5b05a8df54 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/217 |
network_acronym_str |
EMERJ-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?POR QUE TEMER O JUIZ DAS GARANTIAS?juiz das garantiasprincípio acusatóriojudge of guaranteesaccusatory principleThis work aims to demonstrate the imprescindibility of the effectiveness of the Judge of Guarantees in the procedural legal system. The investigation is based on the following problem: There is a resistance of acceptance to the Judge of Guarantees, reminiscent of an authoritarian period of validity of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in order to allow the maintenance of the inquisitorial system, through which, the broad right of defense remains absolutely impaired in the face of the direction of the collection of evidence in the phase of criminal prosecution by the same judge responsible for the trial of the case. It is upheld the absence of any unconstitutionality of Law No. 13,964/19. It is brought with the present text, research led by the German professor Bernd Schünemann, based on the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, in order to demonstrate the degree of involvement of the judge when he is responsible for the collection of evidence, directly affecting his impartiality.Este trabalho tem como escopo demonstrar a imprescindibilidade da efetivação do Juiz das Garantias no ordenamento jurídico processual. Pauta-se a investigação pelo seguinte problema: Há uma resistência de aceitação ao Juiz das Garantias, por reminiscências de um período autoritário de vigência do Código de Processo Penal, de forma a permitir a manutenção do sistema inquisitorial, através do qual, o amplo direito de defesa resta absolutamente prejudicado diante do direcionamento das coletas de provas na fase de persecução penal pelo mesmo juiz responsável pelo julgamento da causa. Sustenta-se a inexistência de qualquer inconstitucionalidade da Lei n° 13.964/19. Traz-se com o presente texto, pesquisa capitaneada pelo professor Alemão Bernd Schünemann, com base na Teoria da Dissonância Cognitiva, a fim de demonstrar o grau de envolvimento do juiz quando é o responsável pela coleta das provas, afetando frontalmente a sua imparcialidade.EMERJ2020-03-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217Revista da EMERJ; v. 23 n. 2 (2021): Revista da EMERJ; 86-1012236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217/158Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da EMERJinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Marcelo Oliveira2023-03-02T00:18:10Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/217Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-03-02T00:18:10Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES? POR QUE TEMER O JUIZ DAS GARANTIAS? |
title |
WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES? |
spellingShingle |
WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES? da Silva, Marcelo Oliveira juiz das garantias princípio acusatório judge of guarantees accusatory principle |
title_short |
WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES? |
title_full |
WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES? |
title_fullStr |
WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES? |
title_full_unstemmed |
WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES? |
title_sort |
WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES? |
author |
da Silva, Marcelo Oliveira |
author_facet |
da Silva, Marcelo Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva, Marcelo Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
juiz das garantias princípio acusatório judge of guarantees accusatory principle |
topic |
juiz das garantias princípio acusatório judge of guarantees accusatory principle |
description |
This work aims to demonstrate the imprescindibility of the effectiveness of the Judge of Guarantees in the procedural legal system. The investigation is based on the following problem: There is a resistance of acceptance to the Judge of Guarantees, reminiscent of an authoritarian period of validity of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in order to allow the maintenance of the inquisitorial system, through which, the broad right of defense remains absolutely impaired in the face of the direction of the collection of evidence in the phase of criminal prosecution by the same judge responsible for the trial of the case. It is upheld the absence of any unconstitutionality of Law No. 13,964/19. It is brought with the present text, research led by the German professor Bernd Schünemann, based on the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, in order to demonstrate the degree of involvement of the judge when he is responsible for the collection of evidence, directly affecting his impartiality. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217 |
url |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217/158 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da EMERJ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da EMERJ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EMERJ |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EMERJ |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ; v. 23 n. 2 (2021): Revista da EMERJ; 86-101 2236-8957 1415-4951 reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online) instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) instacron:EMERJ |
instname_str |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
instacron_str |
EMERJ |
institution |
EMERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
collection |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br |
_version_ |
1797041855027740672 |