WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva, Marcelo Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da EMERJ (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217
Resumo: This work aims to demonstrate the imprescindibility of the effectiveness of the Judge of Guarantees in the procedural legal system. The investigation is based on the following problem: There is a resistance of acceptance to the Judge of Guarantees, reminiscent of an authoritarian period of validity of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in order to allow the maintenance of the inquisitorial system, through which, the broad right of defense remains absolutely impaired in the face of the direction of the collection of evidence in the phase of criminal prosecution by the same judge responsible for the trial of the case. It is upheld the absence of any unconstitutionality of Law No. 13,964/19. It is brought with the present text, research led by the German professor Bernd Schünemann, based on the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, in order to demonstrate the degree of involvement of the judge when he is responsible for the collection of evidence, directly affecting his impartiality.
id EMERJ-2_6c6e233a3ea4ffe8a153fd5b05a8df54
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/217
network_acronym_str EMERJ-2
network_name_str Revista da EMERJ (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?POR QUE TEMER O JUIZ DAS GARANTIAS?juiz das garantiasprincípio acusatóriojudge of guaranteesaccusatory principleThis work aims to demonstrate the imprescindibility of the effectiveness of the Judge of Guarantees in the procedural legal system. The investigation is based on the following problem: There is a resistance of acceptance to the Judge of Guarantees, reminiscent of an authoritarian period of validity of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in order to allow the maintenance of the inquisitorial system, through which, the broad right of defense remains absolutely impaired in the face of the direction of the collection of evidence in the phase of criminal prosecution by the same judge responsible for the trial of the case. It is upheld the absence of any unconstitutionality of Law No. 13,964/19. It is brought with the present text, research led by the German professor Bernd Schünemann, based on the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, in order to demonstrate the degree of involvement of the judge when he is responsible for the collection of evidence, directly affecting his impartiality.Este trabalho tem como escopo demonstrar a imprescindibilidade da efetivação do Juiz das Garantias no ordenamento jurídico processual. Pauta-se a investigação pelo seguinte problema: Há uma resistência de aceitação ao Juiz das Garantias, por reminiscências de um período autoritário de vigência do Código de Processo Penal, de forma a permitir a manutenção do sistema inquisitorial, através do qual, o amplo direito de defesa resta absolutamente prejudicado diante do direcionamento das coletas de provas na fase de persecução penal pelo mesmo juiz responsável pelo julgamento da causa. Sustenta-se a inexistência de qualquer inconstitucionalidade da Lei n° 13.964/19. Traz-se com o presente texto, pesquisa capitaneada pelo professor Alemão Bernd Schünemann, com base na Teoria da Dissonância Cognitiva, a fim de demonstrar o grau de envolvimento do juiz quando é o responsável pela coleta das provas, afetando frontalmente a sua imparcialidade.EMERJ2020-03-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217Revista da EMERJ; v. 23 n. 2 (2021): Revista da EMERJ; 86-1012236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217/158Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da EMERJinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Marcelo Oliveira2023-03-02T00:18:10Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/217Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-03-02T00:18:10Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?
POR QUE TEMER O JUIZ DAS GARANTIAS?
title WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?
spellingShingle WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?
da Silva, Marcelo Oliveira
juiz das garantias
princípio acusatório
judge of guarantees
accusatory principle
title_short WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?
title_full WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?
title_fullStr WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?
title_full_unstemmed WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?
title_sort WHY FEAR THE JUDGE OF GUARANTEES?
author da Silva, Marcelo Oliveira
author_facet da Silva, Marcelo Oliveira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva, Marcelo Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv juiz das garantias
princípio acusatório
judge of guarantees
accusatory principle
topic juiz das garantias
princípio acusatório
judge of guarantees
accusatory principle
description This work aims to demonstrate the imprescindibility of the effectiveness of the Judge of Guarantees in the procedural legal system. The investigation is based on the following problem: There is a resistance of acceptance to the Judge of Guarantees, reminiscent of an authoritarian period of validity of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in order to allow the maintenance of the inquisitorial system, through which, the broad right of defense remains absolutely impaired in the face of the direction of the collection of evidence in the phase of criminal prosecution by the same judge responsible for the trial of the case. It is upheld the absence of any unconstitutionality of Law No. 13,964/19. It is brought with the present text, research led by the German professor Bernd Schünemann, based on the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, in order to demonstrate the degree of involvement of the judge when he is responsible for the collection of evidence, directly affecting his impartiality.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217
url https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/217/158
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da EMERJ
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da EMERJ
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EMERJ
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EMERJ
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ; v. 23 n. 2 (2021): Revista da EMERJ; 86-101
2236-8957
1415-4951
reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)
instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron:EMERJ
instname_str Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron_str EMERJ
institution EMERJ
reponame_str Revista da EMERJ (Online)
collection Revista da EMERJ (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br
_version_ 1797041855027740672