Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sources
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/892 |
Resumo: | – Manure, if managed and used properly, is a good source of nutrients for crop production. To evaluatethe effects of manure and N fertilizer applied on soil surface on corn grain yields, in no-tillage and conventionaltillage systems, a field trial was carried out on a Red Latosol (Oxisol) in Chapecó, Santa Catarina State, Brazil.The experiment was placed under randomized blocks design with split-plots and four replications.The main plotswere represented by different soil tillage (conventional tillage and no-tillage), and the sub-plots by doses of pigslurry (zero, 60, 120 and 240kg N/ha) and sources of N (ammonium nitrate and poultry house litter), applied atthe dose of 120kg N/ha. Corn grain yield response was observed for all N sources. In all four years, pig slurry Nhad similar efficiency to ammonium nitrate N on corn yield. In conventional tillage system there were nosignificant differences on corn yield among the N sources but in no-tillage system the surface poultry house litterapplication had a lower performance.There were no interaction effects of tillage and N rates (pig slurry) on cornyields. The maximum grain yield was estimated with an annual application of 192kg N/ha of pig slurry. |
id |
EPAGRI_64a5cdc4a8b89dbb05ad2133f9d07530 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/892 |
network_acronym_str |
EPAGRI |
network_name_str |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sourcesSistemas de preparo do solo, doses e fontes de adubo nitrogenado na produtividade de milhoZea mays Lestercossuínosavesnitrogênio.– Manure, if managed and used properly, is a good source of nutrients for crop production. To evaluatethe effects of manure and N fertilizer applied on soil surface on corn grain yields, in no-tillage and conventionaltillage systems, a field trial was carried out on a Red Latosol (Oxisol) in Chapecó, Santa Catarina State, Brazil.The experiment was placed under randomized blocks design with split-plots and four replications.The main plotswere represented by different soil tillage (conventional tillage and no-tillage), and the sub-plots by doses of pigslurry (zero, 60, 120 and 240kg N/ha) and sources of N (ammonium nitrate and poultry house litter), applied atthe dose of 120kg N/ha. Corn grain yield response was observed for all N sources. In all four years, pig slurry Nhad similar efficiency to ammonium nitrate N on corn yield. In conventional tillage system there were nosignificant differences on corn yield among the N sources but in no-tillage system the surface poultry house litterapplication had a lower performance.There were no interaction effects of tillage and N rates (pig slurry) on cornyields. The maximum grain yield was estimated with an annual application of 192kg N/ha of pig slurry.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a resposta do milho à aplicação de esterco de aves (EA), de suínos (ES) e nitrato de amônio (NA) em dois sistemas de preparo do solo. O trabalho foi desenvolvido em LatossoloVermelho distroférrico típico, no município de Chapecó, SC, no período de 1998 a 2002. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso com parcelas subdivididas e quatro repetições. Nas parcelas foram avaliadosos sistemas de preparo do solo plantio direto (SPD) e convencional (SPC) e nas subparcelas, doses de ES para suprir zero, 60, 120 e 240kg/ha de N e EA e NA aplicados na dose para suprir 120kg/ha de N, além de uma testemunha, sem adubo. Houve resposta significativa do milho à adubação nitrogenada. As maiores produtividades foram obtidas com utilização de NA e ES. Em aplicação superficial, sem incorporação, o EA apresentou menor eficiência em comparação ao ES, que teve eficiência similar ao NA, tanto no SPC como no SPD. A máxima eficiência técnicafoi estimada para uma aplicação anual de 192kg/ha de N-ES. Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri2021-04-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/892Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2007); 67-71Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 20 n. 2 (2007); 67-712525-60760103-0779reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)instacron:EPAGRIporhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/892/795Copyright (c) 2020 Eloi Erhard Schererhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScherer, Eloi ErhardNunes Nesi, Cristiano2021-04-10T00:17:14Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/892Revistahttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/RAC/indexPUBhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/index.php/RAC/oaieditoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br2525-60760103-0779opendoar:2021-04-10T00:17:14Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sources Sistemas de preparo do solo, doses e fontes de adubo nitrogenado na produtividade de milho |
title |
Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sources |
spellingShingle |
Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sources Scherer, Eloi Erhard Zea mays L estercos suínos aves nitrogênio. |
title_short |
Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sources |
title_full |
Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sources |
title_fullStr |
Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sources |
title_full_unstemmed |
Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sources |
title_sort |
Corn yield related to different soil management systems, doses and N sources |
author |
Scherer, Eloi Erhard |
author_facet |
Scherer, Eloi Erhard Nunes Nesi, Cristiano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nunes Nesi, Cristiano |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Scherer, Eloi Erhard Nunes Nesi, Cristiano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Zea mays L estercos suínos aves nitrogênio. |
topic |
Zea mays L estercos suínos aves nitrogênio. |
description |
– Manure, if managed and used properly, is a good source of nutrients for crop production. To evaluatethe effects of manure and N fertilizer applied on soil surface on corn grain yields, in no-tillage and conventionaltillage systems, a field trial was carried out on a Red Latosol (Oxisol) in Chapecó, Santa Catarina State, Brazil.The experiment was placed under randomized blocks design with split-plots and four replications.The main plotswere represented by different soil tillage (conventional tillage and no-tillage), and the sub-plots by doses of pigslurry (zero, 60, 120 and 240kg N/ha) and sources of N (ammonium nitrate and poultry house litter), applied atthe dose of 120kg N/ha. Corn grain yield response was observed for all N sources. In all four years, pig slurry Nhad similar efficiency to ammonium nitrate N on corn yield. In conventional tillage system there were nosignificant differences on corn yield among the N sources but in no-tillage system the surface poultry house litterapplication had a lower performance.There were no interaction effects of tillage and N rates (pig slurry) on cornyields. The maximum grain yield was estimated with an annual application of 192kg N/ha of pig slurry. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/892 |
url |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/892 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/892/795 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Eloi Erhard Scherer https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Eloi Erhard Scherer https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2007); 67-71 Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 20 n. 2 (2007); 67-71 2525-6076 0103-0779 reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) instacron:EPAGRI |
instname_str |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) |
instacron_str |
EPAGRI |
institution |
EPAGRI |
reponame_str |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
collection |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br |
_version_ |
1754917260390039552 |