Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/533 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to evaluate two different methodologies for the determination of dry matter in cassava roots. For this purpose, in the first trial, roots of four cultivars were used, harvested 10 to 22 months after planting. In a second trial, roots of the cultivar Sambaqui were harvested monthly from two crops with different types of soil. Data of the different cultivars showed that the drying method presented an average dry matter content 5.3% lower than that of the hydrostatic balance in the first vegetative cycle (dormancy stage). In the second vegetative cycle, the drying method presented average levels of 5.7% and 6.7% higher than the hydrostatic balance for the cultivars Sambaqui and Luna, respectively. The cultivars Mandim Branca and Olho Junto showed no significant differences (p> 0.05) between the methods in the second vegetative cycle. In the second test, with the cultivar Sambaqui, the drying method also presented, in the second vegetativecycle, an average dry matter content 6.0% higher than that obtained with the gravimetric method. Differences in dry matter content between methods varied according to the genotype, harvest time and cultivar. |
id |
EPAGRI_aa1648301a1c727bc634c114c1527469 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/533 |
network_acronym_str |
EPAGRI |
network_name_str |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methodsMatéria seca em raízes de mandioca determinada pelos métodos da balança hidrostática e de secagem em estufaManihot esculentamatéria secamétodos de determinaçãoThe objective of this study was to evaluate two different methodologies for the determination of dry matter in cassava roots. For this purpose, in the first trial, roots of four cultivars were used, harvested 10 to 22 months after planting. In a second trial, roots of the cultivar Sambaqui were harvested monthly from two crops with different types of soil. Data of the different cultivars showed that the drying method presented an average dry matter content 5.3% lower than that of the hydrostatic balance in the first vegetative cycle (dormancy stage). In the second vegetative cycle, the drying method presented average levels of 5.7% and 6.7% higher than the hydrostatic balance for the cultivars Sambaqui and Luna, respectively. The cultivars Mandim Branca and Olho Junto showed no significant differences (p> 0.05) between the methods in the second vegetative cycle. In the second test, with the cultivar Sambaqui, the drying method also presented, in the second vegetativecycle, an average dry matter content 6.0% higher than that obtained with the gravimetric method. Differences in dry matter content between methods varied according to the genotype, harvest time and cultivar.Objetivou-se neste estudo comparar duas diferentes metodologias para a determinação da matéria seca em raízes de mandioca. Para tal, foram utilizadas as raízes de quatro cultivares, colhidas de 10 a 22 meses após o plantio, em dois tipos de solo, em Jaguaruna e Sangão, SC, Brasil. Foi observada uma superestimativa média de 5,3% no teor de matéria seca dos quatro genótipos com a utilização do método da balança hidrostática no primeiro ciclo vegetativo (estádio de dormência) e subestimativas médias de 5,7% e 6,7% no segundo ciclo para os cultivares Sambaqui e Luna, respectivamente. Os cultivares Mandim Branca e Olho Junto não apresentaram diferenças significativas (p > 0,05) entre os métodos no segundo ciclo vegetativo. A matéria seca do cultivar Sambaqui, com raízes coletadas em duas lavouras com solos diferentes, também foi subestimada no segundo ciclo em cerca de 6,0% pelo método da balança hidrostática. As diferenças nos teores de matéria seca entre os métodos variaram de acordo com o genótipo, época de colheita e tipo de solo. São apresentadas equações lineares das relações entre os resultados obtidos por ambos os métodos nos dois citados estádios vegetativos.Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri2020-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/53310.52945/rac.v33i1.533Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 33 No. 1 (2020); 56-60Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 33 n. 1 (2020); 56-602525-60760103-0779reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)instacron:EPAGRIporhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/533/707https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPola, Augusto CarlosMoreto, Alexsander LuisNunes, Eduardo da Costa2021-06-01T16:36:59Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/533Revistahttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/RAC/indexPUBhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/index.php/RAC/oaieditoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br2525-60760103-0779opendoar:2021-06-01T16:36:59Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methods Matéria seca em raízes de mandioca determinada pelos métodos da balança hidrostática e de secagem em estufa |
title |
Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methods |
spellingShingle |
Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methods Pola, Augusto Carlos Manihot esculenta matéria seca métodos de determinação |
title_short |
Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methods |
title_full |
Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methods |
title_fullStr |
Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methods |
title_sort |
Dry matter in cassava roots determined by the hydrostatic balance and oven-dry methods |
author |
Pola, Augusto Carlos |
author_facet |
Pola, Augusto Carlos Moreto, Alexsander Luis Nunes, Eduardo da Costa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moreto, Alexsander Luis Nunes, Eduardo da Costa |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pola, Augusto Carlos Moreto, Alexsander Luis Nunes, Eduardo da Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Manihot esculenta matéria seca métodos de determinação |
topic |
Manihot esculenta matéria seca métodos de determinação |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate two different methodologies for the determination of dry matter in cassava roots. For this purpose, in the first trial, roots of four cultivars were used, harvested 10 to 22 months after planting. In a second trial, roots of the cultivar Sambaqui were harvested monthly from two crops with different types of soil. Data of the different cultivars showed that the drying method presented an average dry matter content 5.3% lower than that of the hydrostatic balance in the first vegetative cycle (dormancy stage). In the second vegetative cycle, the drying method presented average levels of 5.7% and 6.7% higher than the hydrostatic balance for the cultivars Sambaqui and Luna, respectively. The cultivars Mandim Branca and Olho Junto showed no significant differences (p> 0.05) between the methods in the second vegetative cycle. In the second test, with the cultivar Sambaqui, the drying method also presented, in the second vegetativecycle, an average dry matter content 6.0% higher than that obtained with the gravimetric method. Differences in dry matter content between methods varied according to the genotype, harvest time and cultivar. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/533 10.52945/rac.v33i1.533 |
url |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/533 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.52945/rac.v33i1.533 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/533/707 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 33 No. 1 (2020); 56-60 Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 33 n. 1 (2020); 56-60 2525-6076 0103-0779 reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) instacron:EPAGRI |
instname_str |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) |
instacron_str |
EPAGRI |
institution |
EPAGRI |
reponame_str |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
collection |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br |
_version_ |
1754917259012210688 |