CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Esmat |
Texto Completo: | http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290 |
Resumo: | The exercise of criminal judicial protection, in times of technological innovation, raises doubts worldwide, a scenario from which Brazil does not distance itself. A mong the technological innovations is the surveillance mechanism called data-monitoring. In the list of existing criminal and procedural principles, its worth noting the prohibition on the production by the accused of evidence against himself (nemotenetur se detegere). In the Brazilian legislative field, the recently created General Law on Data Protection - LGPD and its (non) applicability in criminal law are highlighted. The analysis of the set of instruments and norms existing in Brazil, especially the one related to data protection, made it possible to conclude that it does not guarantee the State, more specifically as a holder of the Jurisdiction, efficiency in the preventive fight against violations of the rights of personality of the accused, with emphasis on the one related to the fence contained in the nemotenetur se detegere, through the use of dataveillance since the normative system, besides not solving the problem must be improved. |
id |
ESMAT_240e1b05c09d094fdb3d4cde03864f40 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/290 |
network_acronym_str |
ESMAT |
network_name_str |
Revista Esmat |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCEQUESTÕES CONTROVERSAS ENVOLVENDO A TUTELA JURISDICIONAL PENAL E AS NOVAS TECNOLOGIAS À LUZ DA LEI GERAL DE PROTEÇÃO DE DADOS (LGPD) BRASILEIRA: DATAVEILLANCEThe exercise of criminal judicial protection, in times of technological innovation, raises doubts worldwide, a scenario from which Brazil does not distance itself. A mong the technological innovations is the surveillance mechanism called data-monitoring. In the list of existing criminal and procedural principles, its worth noting the prohibition on the production by the accused of evidence against himself (nemotenetur se detegere). In the Brazilian legislative field, the recently created General Law on Data Protection - LGPD and its (non) applicability in criminal law are highlighted. The analysis of the set of instruments and norms existing in Brazil, especially the one related to data protection, made it possible to conclude that it does not guarantee the State, more specifically as a holder of the Jurisdiction, efficiency in the preventive fight against violations of the rights of personality of the accused, with emphasis on the one related to the fence contained in the nemotenetur se detegere, through the use of dataveillance since the normative system, besides not solving the problem must be improved. O exercício da tutela jurisdicional penal, em tempos de inovação tecnológica, suscita dúvidas no mundo todo, cenário do qual o Brasil não se distancia. Dentre as inovações tecnológicas destaca-se o mecanismo de vigilância chamado dataveillance. No rol de princípios penais e processuais existentes, destaca-se a vedação à produção, pelo acusado, de provas contra si mesmo (nemotenetur se detegere). No campo legislativo brasileiro, destaque para a recém-criada Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD) e sua não aplicabilidade na seara penal. A análise do conjunto de instrumentos e normas existentes no Brasil, em especial aquele relativo à proteção de dados, tornou possível a conclusão de que não garante ao Estado, mais especificamente na condição de titular da Jurisdição, eficiência no combate preventivo às violações aos direitos de personalidade do acusado, com destaque para aquele relativo à vedação contida no brocardo do nemotenetur se detegere, pela utilização de dataveillance, uma vez que o sistema normativo, além de não solucionar o problema, deve ser aprimorado.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2019-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/29010.34060/reesmat.v11i17.290ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 11 No. 17 (2019); 175-188REVISTA ESMAT; v. 11 n. 17 (2019); 175-1882447-98962177-036010.34060/reesmat.v11i18reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290/246Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMATinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQuintiere, Víctor Minervino2021-10-28T04:12:39Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/290Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2021-10-28T04:12:39Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE QUESTÕES CONTROVERSAS ENVOLVENDO A TUTELA JURISDICIONAL PENAL E AS NOVAS TECNOLOGIAS À LUZ DA LEI GERAL DE PROTEÇÃO DE DADOS (LGPD) BRASILEIRA: DATAVEILLANCE |
title |
CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE |
spellingShingle |
CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE Quintiere, Víctor Minervino |
title_short |
CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE |
title_full |
CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE |
title_fullStr |
CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE |
title_full_unstemmed |
CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE |
title_sort |
CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE |
author |
Quintiere, Víctor Minervino |
author_facet |
Quintiere, Víctor Minervino |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Quintiere, Víctor Minervino |
description |
The exercise of criminal judicial protection, in times of technological innovation, raises doubts worldwide, a scenario from which Brazil does not distance itself. A mong the technological innovations is the surveillance mechanism called data-monitoring. In the list of existing criminal and procedural principles, its worth noting the prohibition on the production by the accused of evidence against himself (nemotenetur se detegere). In the Brazilian legislative field, the recently created General Law on Data Protection - LGPD and its (non) applicability in criminal law are highlighted. The analysis of the set of instruments and norms existing in Brazil, especially the one related to data protection, made it possible to conclude that it does not guarantee the State, more specifically as a holder of the Jurisdiction, efficiency in the preventive fight against violations of the rights of personality of the accused, with emphasis on the one related to the fence contained in the nemotenetur se detegere, through the use of dataveillance since the normative system, besides not solving the problem must be improved. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290 10.34060/reesmat.v11i17.290 |
url |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34060/reesmat.v11i17.290 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290/246 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMAT info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMAT |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 11 No. 17 (2019); 175-188 REVISTA ESMAT; v. 11 n. 17 (2019); 175-188 2447-9896 2177-0360 10.34060/reesmat.v11i18 reponame:Revista Esmat instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) instacron:ESMAT |
instname_str |
Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
instacron_str |
ESMAT |
institution |
ESMAT |
reponame_str |
Revista Esmat |
collection |
Revista Esmat |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br |
_version_ |
1809282623238832128 |