CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Quintiere, Víctor Minervino
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Esmat
Texto Completo: http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290
Resumo: The exercise of criminal judicial protection, in times of technological innovation, raises doubts worldwide, a scenario from which Brazil does not distance itself. A mong the technological innovations is the surveillance mechanism called data-monitoring. In the list of existing criminal and procedural principles, its worth noting the prohibition on the production by the accused of evidence against himself (nemotenetur se detegere). In the Brazilian legislative field, the recently created General Law on Data Protection - LGPD and its (non) applicability in criminal law are highlighted. The analysis of the set of instruments and norms existing in Brazil, especially the one related to data protection, made it possible to conclude that it does not guarantee the State, more specifically as a holder of the Jurisdiction, efficiency in the preventive fight against violations of the rights of personality of the accused, with emphasis on the one related to the fence contained in the nemotenetur se detegere, through the use of dataveillance since the normative system, besides not solving the problem must be improved.  
id ESMAT_240e1b05c09d094fdb3d4cde03864f40
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/290
network_acronym_str ESMAT
network_name_str Revista Esmat
repository_id_str
spelling CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCEQUESTÕES CONTROVERSAS ENVOLVENDO A TUTELA JURISDICIONAL PENAL E AS NOVAS TECNOLOGIAS À LUZ DA LEI GERAL DE PROTEÇÃO DE DADOS (LGPD) BRASILEIRA: DATAVEILLANCEThe exercise of criminal judicial protection, in times of technological innovation, raises doubts worldwide, a scenario from which Brazil does not distance itself. A mong the technological innovations is the surveillance mechanism called data-monitoring. In the list of existing criminal and procedural principles, its worth noting the prohibition on the production by the accused of evidence against himself (nemotenetur se detegere). In the Brazilian legislative field, the recently created General Law on Data Protection - LGPD and its (non) applicability in criminal law are highlighted. The analysis of the set of instruments and norms existing in Brazil, especially the one related to data protection, made it possible to conclude that it does not guarantee the State, more specifically as a holder of the Jurisdiction, efficiency in the preventive fight against violations of the rights of personality of the accused, with emphasis on the one related to the fence contained in the nemotenetur se detegere, through the use of dataveillance since the normative system, besides not solving the problem must be improved.  O exercício da tutela jurisdicional penal, em tempos de inovação tecnológica, suscita dúvidas no mundo todo, cenário do qual o Brasil não se distancia. Dentre as inovações tecnológicas destaca-se o mecanismo de vigilância chamado dataveillance. No rol de princípios penais e processuais existentes, destaca-se a vedação à produção, pelo acusado, de provas contra si mesmo (nemotenetur se detegere). No campo legislativo brasileiro, destaque para a recém-criada Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD) e sua não aplicabilidade na seara penal. A análise do conjunto de instrumentos e normas existentes no Brasil, em especial aquele relativo à proteção de dados, tornou possível a conclusão de que não garante ao Estado, mais especificamente na condição de titular da Jurisdição, eficiência no combate preventivo às violações aos direitos de personalidade do acusado, com destaque para aquele relativo à vedação contida no brocardo do nemotenetur se detegere, pela utilização de dataveillance, uma vez que o sistema normativo, além de não solucionar o problema, deve ser aprimorado.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2019-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/29010.34060/reesmat.v11i17.290ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 11 No. 17 (2019); 175-188REVISTA ESMAT; v. 11 n. 17 (2019); 175-1882447-98962177-036010.34060/reesmat.v11i18reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290/246Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMATinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQuintiere, Víctor Minervino2021-10-28T04:12:39Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/290Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2021-10-28T04:12:39Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE
QUESTÕES CONTROVERSAS ENVOLVENDO A TUTELA JURISDICIONAL PENAL E AS NOVAS TECNOLOGIAS À LUZ DA LEI GERAL DE PROTEÇÃO DE DADOS (LGPD) BRASILEIRA: DATAVEILLANCE
title CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE
spellingShingle CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE
Quintiere, Víctor Minervino
title_short CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE
title_full CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE
title_fullStr CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE
title_full_unstemmed CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE
title_sort CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES INVOLVING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE BRAZILIAN GENERAL LAW OF DATA PROTECTION (DPL): DATAVEILLANCE
author Quintiere, Víctor Minervino
author_facet Quintiere, Víctor Minervino
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Quintiere, Víctor Minervino
description The exercise of criminal judicial protection, in times of technological innovation, raises doubts worldwide, a scenario from which Brazil does not distance itself. A mong the technological innovations is the surveillance mechanism called data-monitoring. In the list of existing criminal and procedural principles, its worth noting the prohibition on the production by the accused of evidence against himself (nemotenetur se detegere). In the Brazilian legislative field, the recently created General Law on Data Protection - LGPD and its (non) applicability in criminal law are highlighted. The analysis of the set of instruments and norms existing in Brazil, especially the one related to data protection, made it possible to conclude that it does not guarantee the State, more specifically as a holder of the Jurisdiction, efficiency in the preventive fight against violations of the rights of personality of the accused, with emphasis on the one related to the fence contained in the nemotenetur se detegere, through the use of dataveillance since the normative system, besides not solving the problem must be improved.  
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290
10.34060/reesmat.v11i17.290
url http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290
identifier_str_mv 10.34060/reesmat.v11i17.290
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/290/246
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMAT
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMAT
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 11 No. 17 (2019); 175-188
REVISTA ESMAT; v. 11 n. 17 (2019); 175-188
2447-9896
2177-0360
10.34060/reesmat.v11i18
reponame:Revista Esmat
instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
instacron:ESMAT
instname_str Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
instacron_str ESMAT
institution ESMAT
reponame_str Revista Esmat
collection Revista Esmat
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br
_version_ 1809282623238832128