DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves Santana, Ágatha
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Bezerra Ribeiro, Marcelo, da Silva Ferreira, Rebeca
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Esmat
Texto Completo: http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585
Resumo: The divergence in the reasoning of judicial decisions in Brazilian courts, even when unanimous, raises questions about its impact on the legal system, essentially in relation to the reasoning used by judges in their votes. Given this context, the central problem of this research arises: How does the divergence in the reasoning of unanimous or non-unanimous decisions affect the democratic rule of law? The study focuses on REsp nº 1.495.920. The main objective is to analyze the theory of integrity and ethical standards based on Ronald Dworkin's theory as a theoretical basis for analysis. In addition, it seeks to evaluate the concept of reasoning of decisions in the light of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, which refers directly to an analysis necessarily in the light of the values and norms of the 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. To this end, the research adopts a quantitative-qualitative approach, of a predominantly empirical nature, using bibliographic and documentary sources, doctrines, theories, articles and case law.
id ESMAT_430ae12cf07c325f721059f98291e3b0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/585
network_acronym_str ESMAT
network_name_str Revista Esmat
repository_id_str
spelling DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATICA DIVERGÊNCIA NA MOTIVAÇÃO DE VOTOS UNÂNIMES E NÃO UNÂNIMES E A PRESERVAÇÃO DO ESTADO DEMOCRÁTICO DE DIREITO: ANÁLISE DO RESP Nº 1.495.920Divergências. Votos Unânimes. Votos Não Unânimes. Motivação das Decisões Judiciais.Divergences. Unanimous Votes. Non-Unanimous Vote. Rationale.The divergence in the reasoning of judicial decisions in Brazilian courts, even when unanimous, raises questions about its impact on the legal system, essentially in relation to the reasoning used by judges in their votes. Given this context, the central problem of this research arises: How does the divergence in the reasoning of unanimous or non-unanimous decisions affect the democratic rule of law? The study focuses on REsp nº 1.495.920. The main objective is to analyze the theory of integrity and ethical standards based on Ronald Dworkin's theory as a theoretical basis for analysis. In addition, it seeks to evaluate the concept of reasoning of decisions in the light of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, which refers directly to an analysis necessarily in the light of the values and norms of the 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. To this end, the research adopts a quantitative-qualitative approach, of a predominantly empirical nature, using bibliographic and documentary sources, doctrines, theories, articles and case law.A divergência na fundamentação das decisões judiciais em sede dos tribunais brasileiros, mesmo quando unânimes, suscita questões sobre o seu impacto no ordenamento jurídico, essencialmente em relação à fundamentação utilizada pelos julgadores em seus votos. Diante desse contexto, surge a problemática central da presente pesquisa: Como a divergência na fundamentação das decisões de votos, unânimes ou não unânimes, afeta o Estado Democrático de Direito? O estudo concentra-se no REsp nº 1.495.920. O objetivo central é analisar a teoria da integridade e os padrões éticos a partir da teoria de Ronald Dworkin como base teórica de análise. Além disso, busca-se avaliar o conceito de fundamentação das decisões à luz do Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, o qual remete diretamente a uma análise necessariamente à luz dos valores e das normas da Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, de 1988. Para isso, a pesquisa adota uma abordagem quantiqualitativa, de caráter predominantemente empírico, utilizando fontes bibliográficas, documentais, doutrinas, teorias, artigos e jurisprudência.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2024-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/58510.29327/270098.15.26-3ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 15 No. 26 (2023); 65-82REVISTA ESMAT; v. 15 n. 26 (2023); 65-822447-98962177-0360reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporenghttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585/445http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585/472Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA ESMAThttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves Santana, ÁgathaBezerra Ribeiro, Marceloda Silva Ferreira, Rebeca2024-04-12T18:13:15Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/585Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2024-04-12T18:13:15Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
A DIVERGÊNCIA NA MOTIVAÇÃO DE VOTOS UNÂNIMES E NÃO UNÂNIMES E A PRESERVAÇÃO DO ESTADO DEMOCRÁTICO DE DIREITO: ANÁLISE DO RESP Nº 1.495.920
title DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
spellingShingle DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
Gonçalves Santana, Ágatha
Divergências. Votos Unânimes. Votos Não Unânimes. Motivação das Decisões Judiciais.
Divergences. Unanimous Votes. Non-Unanimous Vote. Rationale.
title_short DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
title_full DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
title_fullStr DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
title_full_unstemmed DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
title_sort DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
author Gonçalves Santana, Ágatha
author_facet Gonçalves Santana, Ágatha
Bezerra Ribeiro, Marcelo
da Silva Ferreira, Rebeca
author_role author
author2 Bezerra Ribeiro, Marcelo
da Silva Ferreira, Rebeca
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves Santana, Ágatha
Bezerra Ribeiro, Marcelo
da Silva Ferreira, Rebeca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Divergências. Votos Unânimes. Votos Não Unânimes. Motivação das Decisões Judiciais.
Divergences. Unanimous Votes. Non-Unanimous Vote. Rationale.
topic Divergências. Votos Unânimes. Votos Não Unânimes. Motivação das Decisões Judiciais.
Divergences. Unanimous Votes. Non-Unanimous Vote. Rationale.
description The divergence in the reasoning of judicial decisions in Brazilian courts, even when unanimous, raises questions about its impact on the legal system, essentially in relation to the reasoning used by judges in their votes. Given this context, the central problem of this research arises: How does the divergence in the reasoning of unanimous or non-unanimous decisions affect the democratic rule of law? The study focuses on REsp nº 1.495.920. The main objective is to analyze the theory of integrity and ethical standards based on Ronald Dworkin's theory as a theoretical basis for analysis. In addition, it seeks to evaluate the concept of reasoning of decisions in the light of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, which refers directly to an analysis necessarily in the light of the values and norms of the 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. To this end, the research adopts a quantitative-qualitative approach, of a predominantly empirical nature, using bibliographic and documentary sources, doctrines, theories, articles and case law.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585
10.29327/270098.15.26-3
url http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585
identifier_str_mv 10.29327/270098.15.26-3
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585/445
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585/472
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA ESMAT
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA ESMAT
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 15 No. 26 (2023); 65-82
REVISTA ESMAT; v. 15 n. 26 (2023); 65-82
2447-9896
2177-0360
reponame:Revista Esmat
instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
instacron:ESMAT
instname_str Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
instacron_str ESMAT
institution ESMAT
reponame_str Revista Esmat
collection Revista Esmat
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br
_version_ 1798321201259479040

Registros relacionados