DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Esmat |
Texto Completo: | http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585 |
Resumo: | The divergence in the reasoning of judicial decisions in Brazilian courts, even when unanimous, raises questions about its impact on the legal system, essentially in relation to the reasoning used by judges in their votes. Given this context, the central problem of this research arises: How does the divergence in the reasoning of unanimous or non-unanimous decisions affect the democratic rule of law? The study focuses on REsp nº 1.495.920. The main objective is to analyze the theory of integrity and ethical standards based on Ronald Dworkin's theory as a theoretical basis for analysis. In addition, it seeks to evaluate the concept of reasoning of decisions in the light of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, which refers directly to an analysis necessarily in the light of the values and norms of the 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. To this end, the research adopts a quantitative-qualitative approach, of a predominantly empirical nature, using bibliographic and documentary sources, doctrines, theories, articles and case law. |
id |
ESMAT_430ae12cf07c325f721059f98291e3b0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/585 |
network_acronym_str |
ESMAT |
network_name_str |
Revista Esmat |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATICA DIVERGÊNCIA NA MOTIVAÇÃO DE VOTOS UNÂNIMES E NÃO UNÂNIMES E A PRESERVAÇÃO DO ESTADO DEMOCRÁTICO DE DIREITO: ANÁLISE DO RESP Nº 1.495.920Divergências. Votos Unânimes. Votos Não Unânimes. Motivação das Decisões Judiciais.Divergences. Unanimous Votes. Non-Unanimous Vote. Rationale.The divergence in the reasoning of judicial decisions in Brazilian courts, even when unanimous, raises questions about its impact on the legal system, essentially in relation to the reasoning used by judges in their votes. Given this context, the central problem of this research arises: How does the divergence in the reasoning of unanimous or non-unanimous decisions affect the democratic rule of law? The study focuses on REsp nº 1.495.920. The main objective is to analyze the theory of integrity and ethical standards based on Ronald Dworkin's theory as a theoretical basis for analysis. In addition, it seeks to evaluate the concept of reasoning of decisions in the light of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, which refers directly to an analysis necessarily in the light of the values and norms of the 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. To this end, the research adopts a quantitative-qualitative approach, of a predominantly empirical nature, using bibliographic and documentary sources, doctrines, theories, articles and case law.A divergência na fundamentação das decisões judiciais em sede dos tribunais brasileiros, mesmo quando unânimes, suscita questões sobre o seu impacto no ordenamento jurídico, essencialmente em relação à fundamentação utilizada pelos julgadores em seus votos. Diante desse contexto, surge a problemática central da presente pesquisa: Como a divergência na fundamentação das decisões de votos, unânimes ou não unânimes, afeta o Estado Democrático de Direito? O estudo concentra-se no REsp nº 1.495.920. O objetivo central é analisar a teoria da integridade e os padrões éticos a partir da teoria de Ronald Dworkin como base teórica de análise. Além disso, busca-se avaliar o conceito de fundamentação das decisões à luz do Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, o qual remete diretamente a uma análise necessariamente à luz dos valores e das normas da Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, de 1988. Para isso, a pesquisa adota uma abordagem quantiqualitativa, de caráter predominantemente empírico, utilizando fontes bibliográficas, documentais, doutrinas, teorias, artigos e jurisprudência.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2024-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/58510.29327/270098.15.26-3ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 15 No. 26 (2023); 65-82REVISTA ESMAT; v. 15 n. 26 (2023); 65-822447-98962177-0360reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporenghttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585/445http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585/472Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA ESMAThttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves Santana, ÁgathaBezerra Ribeiro, Marceloda Silva Ferreira, Rebeca2024-07-04T20:06:12Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/585Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2024-07-04T20:06:12Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC A DIVERGÊNCIA NA MOTIVAÇÃO DE VOTOS UNÂNIMES E NÃO UNÂNIMES E A PRESERVAÇÃO DO ESTADO DEMOCRÁTICO DE DIREITO: ANÁLISE DO RESP Nº 1.495.920 |
title |
DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC |
spellingShingle |
DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC Gonçalves Santana, Ágatha Divergências. Votos Unânimes. Votos Não Unânimes. Motivação das Decisões Judiciais. Divergences. Unanimous Votes. Non-Unanimous Vote. Rationale. |
title_short |
DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC |
title_full |
DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC |
title_fullStr |
DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC |
title_full_unstemmed |
DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC |
title_sort |
DIVERGENCE IN THE MOTIVATION OF UNANIMOUS AND NON- UNANIMOUS VOTES AND THE PRESERVATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC |
author |
Gonçalves Santana, Ágatha |
author_facet |
Gonçalves Santana, Ágatha Bezerra Ribeiro, Marcelo da Silva Ferreira, Rebeca |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bezerra Ribeiro, Marcelo da Silva Ferreira, Rebeca |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves Santana, Ágatha Bezerra Ribeiro, Marcelo da Silva Ferreira, Rebeca |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Divergências. Votos Unânimes. Votos Não Unânimes. Motivação das Decisões Judiciais. Divergences. Unanimous Votes. Non-Unanimous Vote. Rationale. |
topic |
Divergências. Votos Unânimes. Votos Não Unânimes. Motivação das Decisões Judiciais. Divergences. Unanimous Votes. Non-Unanimous Vote. Rationale. |
description |
The divergence in the reasoning of judicial decisions in Brazilian courts, even when unanimous, raises questions about its impact on the legal system, essentially in relation to the reasoning used by judges in their votes. Given this context, the central problem of this research arises: How does the divergence in the reasoning of unanimous or non-unanimous decisions affect the democratic rule of law? The study focuses on REsp nº 1.495.920. The main objective is to analyze the theory of integrity and ethical standards based on Ronald Dworkin's theory as a theoretical basis for analysis. In addition, it seeks to evaluate the concept of reasoning of decisions in the light of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, which refers directly to an analysis necessarily in the light of the values and norms of the 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. To this end, the research adopts a quantitative-qualitative approach, of a predominantly empirical nature, using bibliographic and documentary sources, doctrines, theories, articles and case law. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585 10.29327/270098.15.26-3 |
url |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.29327/270098.15.26-3 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585/445 http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/585/472 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA ESMAT http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA ESMAT http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 15 No. 26 (2023); 65-82 REVISTA ESMAT; v. 15 n. 26 (2023); 65-82 2447-9896 2177-0360 reponame:Revista Esmat instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) instacron:ESMAT |
instname_str |
Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
instacron_str |
ESMAT |
institution |
ESMAT |
reponame_str |
Revista Esmat |
collection |
Revista Esmat |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br |
_version_ |
1809282623732711424 |