THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Esmat |
Texto Completo: | http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/381 |
Resumo: | The present study had as its basic and specific purpose, to analyze the trajectory of the occurrences of violence against women in the Criminal Court of Dianópolis-TO, from 2015 to October 2019, in which were discussed: the number of protective measures cited during the period mentioned above, and whether or not the conciliation hearing provided for in Article 16 of the aforementioned Law was necessary. The methodology used here was the bibliographic research and the field research, which consisted of a research based on procedural data collected within of the E-proc Procedural System in the Criminal Court of the District of Dianópolis-TO and interviews with judges of that County. It concludes the innovations of Law No. 11.340 / 2006, also known as the Maria da Penha Law, inserted in the legal system. Brazilian list of measures aimed at rescuing female citizenship and assuring women the right to a life without violence. Thus, the aggressions suffered by women are of a physical, psychological, sexual, patrimonial and even moral character, which began to have differentiated treatment by the State. The subject is quite controversial and brought changes that presuppose, beyond formal equality, a differentiated treatment for the victim (woman) and the offender, seeking to adapt to the needs and peculiarities of each, especially as regards the Protective Measure and the victim's resignation before the Public Prosecution Service. |
id |
ESMAT_9249c09ea0f56ec7554fa23ea33119e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/381 |
network_acronym_str |
ESMAT |
network_name_str |
Revista Esmat |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY(IN)APLICABILIDADE DA AUDIÊNCIA PREVISTA NO ARTIGO Nº 16 DA LEI Nº 11.340, DE 2006, NO JUÍZO DA VARA CRIMINAL DA COMARCA DE DIANÓPOLIS-TOConciliação. Dianópolis-TO. Juízo Criminal. Ocorrências. Violência Contra a Mulher.Conciliation. Criminal Judgment. Dianópolis-TO. Occurrences. Violence against Women.The present study had as its basic and specific purpose, to analyze the trajectory of the occurrences of violence against women in the Criminal Court of Dianópolis-TO, from 2015 to October 2019, in which were discussed: the number of protective measures cited during the period mentioned above, and whether or not the conciliation hearing provided for in Article 16 of the aforementioned Law was necessary. The methodology used here was the bibliographic research and the field research, which consisted of a research based on procedural data collected within of the E-proc Procedural System in the Criminal Court of the District of Dianópolis-TO and interviews with judges of that County. It concludes the innovations of Law No. 11.340 / 2006, also known as the Maria da Penha Law, inserted in the legal system. Brazilian list of measures aimed at rescuing female citizenship and assuring women the right to a life without violence. Thus, the aggressions suffered by women are of a physical, psychological, sexual, patrimonial and even moral character, which began to have differentiated treatment by the State. The subject is quite controversial and brought changes that presuppose, beyond formal equality, a differentiated treatment for the victim (woman) and the offender, seeking to adapt to the needs and peculiarities of each, especially as regards the Protective Measure and the victim's resignation before the Public Prosecution Service.O presente estudo teve como intuito básico e específico, analisar a trajetória das ocorrências de violência contra as mulheres no Juízo da Vara Criminal de Dianópolis-TO, entre os anos de 2015 a 2019, no qual foram discutidos: o número de medidas protetivas realizadas no período citado, e a necessidade, ou não, de ser realizada a audiência conciliatória prevista no artigo nº 16 da referida Lei. A metodologia empregada foi a pesquisa bibliográfica e a pesquisa de campo, baseada em dados processuais coletados no Sistema Processual e-Proc e entrevistas com juízes da Vara Criminal da Comarca de Dianópolis-TO. Concluem-se as inovações da Lei n° 11.340, de 2006, conhecida também como Lei Maria da Penha, a qual inseriu no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro um rol de medidas com vista a resgatar a cidadania feminina e assegurar à mulher o direito a uma vida sem violência. Dessarte, as agressões sofridas pelas mulheres, sejam de caráter físico, psicológico, sexual, patrimonial e moral, que passaram a ter tratamento diferenciado pelo Estado. O tema é bastante controvertido e trouxe mudanças que pressupõem, para além da igualdade formal, um tratamento diferenciado para a vítima (mulher) e para o infrator, buscando adequar às necessidades e peculiaridades de cada um, principalmente no que se refere à Medida Protetiva e à renúncia, perante o Ministério Público, por parte da vítima.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2021-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/38110.34060/reesmat.v12i20.381ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 12 No. 20 (2020); 32-49REVISTA ESMAT; v. 12 n. 20 (2020); 32-492447-98962177-036010.34060/reesmat.v12i20reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporenghttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/381/291http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/381/433http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSérgio Melo Xavier , MárioRibeiro Diniz , Hamurab Schelive Correia , Italo2024-02-16T18:32:44Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/381Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2024-02-16T18:32:44Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY (IN)APLICABILIDADE DA AUDIÊNCIA PREVISTA NO ARTIGO Nº 16 DA LEI Nº 11.340, DE 2006, NO JUÍZO DA VARA CRIMINAL DA COMARCA DE DIANÓPOLIS-TO |
title |
THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY |
spellingShingle |
THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY Sérgio Melo Xavier , Mário Conciliação. Dianópolis-TO. Juízo Criminal. Ocorrências. Violência Contra a Mulher. Conciliation. Criminal Judgment. Dianópolis-TO. Occurrences. Violence against Women. |
title_short |
THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY |
title_full |
THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY |
title_fullStr |
THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY |
title_sort |
THE (IN)APPLICABILITY OF THE HEARING PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 16 OF LAW NO. 11.340/06 IN THE CRIMINAL STICK OF THE DIANOPOLIS-TO COUNTY |
author |
Sérgio Melo Xavier , Mário |
author_facet |
Sérgio Melo Xavier , Mário Ribeiro Diniz , Hamurab Schelive Correia , Italo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro Diniz , Hamurab Schelive Correia , Italo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sérgio Melo Xavier , Mário Ribeiro Diniz , Hamurab Schelive Correia , Italo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Conciliação. Dianópolis-TO. Juízo Criminal. Ocorrências. Violência Contra a Mulher. Conciliation. Criminal Judgment. Dianópolis-TO. Occurrences. Violence against Women. |
topic |
Conciliação. Dianópolis-TO. Juízo Criminal. Ocorrências. Violência Contra a Mulher. Conciliation. Criminal Judgment. Dianópolis-TO. Occurrences. Violence against Women. |
description |
The present study had as its basic and specific purpose, to analyze the trajectory of the occurrences of violence against women in the Criminal Court of Dianópolis-TO, from 2015 to October 2019, in which were discussed: the number of protective measures cited during the period mentioned above, and whether or not the conciliation hearing provided for in Article 16 of the aforementioned Law was necessary. The methodology used here was the bibliographic research and the field research, which consisted of a research based on procedural data collected within of the E-proc Procedural System in the Criminal Court of the District of Dianópolis-TO and interviews with judges of that County. It concludes the innovations of Law No. 11.340 / 2006, also known as the Maria da Penha Law, inserted in the legal system. Brazilian list of measures aimed at rescuing female citizenship and assuring women the right to a life without violence. Thus, the aggressions suffered by women are of a physical, psychological, sexual, patrimonial and even moral character, which began to have differentiated treatment by the State. The subject is quite controversial and brought changes that presuppose, beyond formal equality, a differentiated treatment for the victim (woman) and the offender, seeking to adapt to the needs and peculiarities of each, especially as regards the Protective Measure and the victim's resignation before the Public Prosecution Service. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/381 10.34060/reesmat.v12i20.381 |
url |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/381 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34060/reesmat.v12i20.381 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/381/291 http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/381/433 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 12 No. 20 (2020); 32-49 REVISTA ESMAT; v. 12 n. 20 (2020); 32-49 2447-9896 2177-0360 10.34060/reesmat.v12i20 reponame:Revista Esmat instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) instacron:ESMAT |
instname_str |
Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
instacron_str |
ESMAT |
institution |
ESMAT |
reponame_str |
Revista Esmat |
collection |
Revista Esmat |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br |
_version_ |
1809282623301746688 |