THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Esmat |
Texto Completo: | http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/230 |
Resumo: | The Brazilian Constitution, of 1988, protected the environment from an anthropocentric conception with an ecological perspective, including the protection of the environment in the same juridical and political system, from fundamental, social, political and economic rights, revealing the option for the State of Social and Environmental Law, in which pluralism and multiculturalism gained special importance. Otherwise, despite the normative advance and the public policies developed in Brazil, the juridical system has not achieved enough normative force yet to avoid environmental degradation, bringing to the Judiciary the task of resolving the several conflicts between the right to development and the right to the balanced and healthy environment, often not majority, as it is required by the weighting of fundamental rights, especially of minorities, task that requires more laborious argumentation and motivation, with the consciousness that the principle of reasonableness often seems to be insufficient to resolve environmental conflicts, hence the importance of procedural opening for popular participation, to offer a greater degree of democratic legitimacy to the discursive construction of the judicial protection. |
id |
ESMAT_d7ad97c7f4339381c1a25c8e40d49cfa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/230 |
network_acronym_str |
ESMAT |
network_name_str |
Revista Esmat |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTIONA MOTIVAÇÃO DA TUTELA JUDICIAL AMBIENTALThe Brazilian Constitution, of 1988, protected the environment from an anthropocentric conception with an ecological perspective, including the protection of the environment in the same juridical and political system, from fundamental, social, political and economic rights, revealing the option for the State of Social and Environmental Law, in which pluralism and multiculturalism gained special importance. Otherwise, despite the normative advance and the public policies developed in Brazil, the juridical system has not achieved enough normative force yet to avoid environmental degradation, bringing to the Judiciary the task of resolving the several conflicts between the right to development and the right to the balanced and healthy environment, often not majority, as it is required by the weighting of fundamental rights, especially of minorities, task that requires more laborious argumentation and motivation, with the consciousness that the principle of reasonableness often seems to be insufficient to resolve environmental conflicts, hence the importance of procedural opening for popular participation, to offer a greater degree of democratic legitimacy to the discursive construction of the judicial protection.A Constituição do Brasil, de 1988, protegeu o ambiente a partir de uma concepção antropocentrista com viés ecológico, incluindo no mesmo sistema jurídico-político a proteção do ambiente, a partir de direitos fundamentais, sociais, políticos e econômicos, a revelar a opção pelo Estado de Direito Socioambiental, no qual o pluralismo e o multiculturalismo ganharam especial relevo. De outro modo, apesar do avanço normativo e das políticas públicas desenvolvidas no Brasil, o sistema jurídico ainda não alcançou força normativa suficiente para impedir a degradação ambiental, cabendo ao Poder Judiciário a tarefa de solucionar os diversos conflitos entre o direito ao desenvolvimento e o direito ao ambiente equilibrado e saudável, muitas vezes contramajoritariamente, como exige a ponderação que envolve direitos fundamentais, notadamente de minorias, tarefa que exige argumentação e motivação mais laboriosas, com a consciência de que muitas vezes o princípio da razoabilidade se mostra insuficiente para resolver conflitos ambientais, daí a importância da abertura processual para participação popular, a oferecer maior grau de legitimação democrática à construção discursiva da tutela judicial.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2018-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/23010.34060/reesmat.v10i15.230ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 10 No. 15 (2018); 13-36REVISTA ESMAT; v. 10 n. 15 (2018); 13-362447-98962177-036010.34060/reesmat.v10i15reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/230/205Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA ESMATinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVillas Boas, Marco Anthony StevesonArruda, Laudyone Edmailtom dos Santos2021-10-28T04:23:57Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/230Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2021-10-28T04:23:57Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTION A MOTIVAÇÃO DA TUTELA JUDICIAL AMBIENTAL |
title |
THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTION |
spellingShingle |
THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTION Villas Boas, Marco Anthony Steveson |
title_short |
THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTION |
title_full |
THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTION |
title_fullStr |
THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTION |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTION |
title_sort |
THE MOTIVATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUDICIAL PROTECTION |
author |
Villas Boas, Marco Anthony Steveson |
author_facet |
Villas Boas, Marco Anthony Steveson Arruda, Laudyone Edmailtom dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Arruda, Laudyone Edmailtom dos Santos |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Villas Boas, Marco Anthony Steveson Arruda, Laudyone Edmailtom dos Santos |
description |
The Brazilian Constitution, of 1988, protected the environment from an anthropocentric conception with an ecological perspective, including the protection of the environment in the same juridical and political system, from fundamental, social, political and economic rights, revealing the option for the State of Social and Environmental Law, in which pluralism and multiculturalism gained special importance. Otherwise, despite the normative advance and the public policies developed in Brazil, the juridical system has not achieved enough normative force yet to avoid environmental degradation, bringing to the Judiciary the task of resolving the several conflicts between the right to development and the right to the balanced and healthy environment, often not majority, as it is required by the weighting of fundamental rights, especially of minorities, task that requires more laborious argumentation and motivation, with the consciousness that the principle of reasonableness often seems to be insufficient to resolve environmental conflicts, hence the importance of procedural opening for popular participation, to offer a greater degree of democratic legitimacy to the discursive construction of the judicial protection. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/230 10.34060/reesmat.v10i15.230 |
url |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/230 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34060/reesmat.v10i15.230 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/230/205 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA ESMAT info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA ESMAT |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 10 No. 15 (2018); 13-36 REVISTA ESMAT; v. 10 n. 15 (2018); 13-36 2447-9896 2177-0360 10.34060/reesmat.v10i15 reponame:Revista Esmat instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) instacron:ESMAT |
instname_str |
Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
instacron_str |
ESMAT |
institution |
ESMAT |
reponame_str |
Revista Esmat |
collection |
Revista Esmat |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br |
_version_ |
1809282622900142080 |