The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Identidade! |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/identidade/article/view/2524 |
Resumo: | Violence against women, presented in this article, is a widely discussed topic in various areas of knowledge, among them the territorial studies, whose objectives are focused on finding solutions which envisage the promotion of women in society, as a person endowed with rights. This paper discusses male dominance which generates symbolic violence against women, present in religious discourse that legitimizes the process of male supremacy, from the historical context of the patriarchal family and the theory discussed by Pierre Bourdieu (2014). This work of Bourdieu presents important elements for analysis of the issue of male dominance in considering the existence of symbolic violence against women, on the assumption that Western societies cultivate the same principles rooted in the Kabyle society, in Algeria, where the author carried out this study, and consequently wrote the referenced book. The methodology used in this study was based on a literature review on the topic. We considered the descriptive perspective to the approach and contributions of Engels (1975), Muraro (2003), Beauvoir (1982) and Belizário (2006), Giordani (2003), Del Priori (1990), Gebara (2000), Perrot (2003), Borin (2007), and JarscheNanjari (2008), among others. It was concluded that male domination was a creation of man with the emergence of the monogamous and patriarchal family, after the short period of matriarchal dominance, in the prehistoric stage. And that, to legitimize and reproduce this social structure, the role of the Christian religion was fundamental with the exhortation to the continued practice of submission and obedience of women to men who, through the symbolic violence, naturalizes and perpetuates this power relationship. The liberation from this male domination can only occur through the liberation of men from the same territorial structures that contribute to this imposition. If women are subjected to a work of socialization that leads to the reduction and denial of their virtues, men are also prisoners of the same structure, and sometimes without realizing it, are subjects of this same representation and violence. The reconstruction of territoriality that protects women's dignity passes therefore through the reversal of social structures which provide and reproduce the myth of female inferiority in comparison with the man. There have been many advances made by feminist movements in the social and political space, but it is also true that there is still a male-domination in all fields of the life of women. After all, if men and women are created equal as human beings, they should share the same territory of equality. |
id |
EST-2_b4525a3cfff75cd4f20093695a58a5c2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.est.edu.br/periodicos:article/2524 |
network_acronym_str |
EST-2 |
network_name_str |
Identidade! |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourseA dominação masculina e a violência simbólica contra a mulher no discurso religiosoMale Domination; Women; Symbolic Violence; ReligionHistória; Antropologia; Educação; PsicologiaDominação Masculina; Mulher; Violência Simbólica; ReligiãoViolence against women, presented in this article, is a widely discussed topic in various areas of knowledge, among them the territorial studies, whose objectives are focused on finding solutions which envisage the promotion of women in society, as a person endowed with rights. This paper discusses male dominance which generates symbolic violence against women, present in religious discourse that legitimizes the process of male supremacy, from the historical context of the patriarchal family and the theory discussed by Pierre Bourdieu (2014). This work of Bourdieu presents important elements for analysis of the issue of male dominance in considering the existence of symbolic violence against women, on the assumption that Western societies cultivate the same principles rooted in the Kabyle society, in Algeria, where the author carried out this study, and consequently wrote the referenced book. The methodology used in this study was based on a literature review on the topic. We considered the descriptive perspective to the approach and contributions of Engels (1975), Muraro (2003), Beauvoir (1982) and Belizário (2006), Giordani (2003), Del Priori (1990), Gebara (2000), Perrot (2003), Borin (2007), and JarscheNanjari (2008), among others. It was concluded that male domination was a creation of man with the emergence of the monogamous and patriarchal family, after the short period of matriarchal dominance, in the prehistoric stage. And that, to legitimize and reproduce this social structure, the role of the Christian religion was fundamental with the exhortation to the continued practice of submission and obedience of women to men who, through the symbolic violence, naturalizes and perpetuates this power relationship. The liberation from this male domination can only occur through the liberation of men from the same territorial structures that contribute to this imposition. If women are subjected to a work of socialization that leads to the reduction and denial of their virtues, men are also prisoners of the same structure, and sometimes without realizing it, are subjects of this same representation and violence. The reconstruction of territoriality that protects women's dignity passes therefore through the reversal of social structures which provide and reproduce the myth of female inferiority in comparison with the man. There have been many advances made by feminist movements in the social and political space, but it is also true that there is still a male-domination in all fields of the life of women. After all, if men and women are created equal as human beings, they should share the same territory of equality.A violência contra a mulher, pautada neste artigo, é assunto amplamente discutido nas diversas áreas do conhecimento, dentre elas os estudos territoriais, cujos objetivos concentram-se em buscar soluções que vislumbrem a promoção da mulher na sociedade, como pessoa dotada de direitos. Este trabalho busca discutir a dominação masculina, geradora da violência simbólica contra a mulher, presente no discurso religioso que legitima o processo da supremacia masculina, a partir do contexto histórico da família patriarcal e da teoria abordada por Pierre Bourdieu (2014). Esta obra de Bourdieu apresenta elementos importantes para análise da questão da dominação masculina, ao considerar a existência da violência simbólica contra a mulher, partindo do pressuposto de que as sociedades ocidentais cultivam os mesmos princípios arraigados na sociedade de Cabila, na Argélia, local onde o autor se dedicou a este estudo, e consequentemente, à escrita do livro referenciado. A metodologia utilizada neste trabalho baseou-se numa revisão bibliográfica sobre o tema. Considerou-se a perspectiva descritiva para a abordagem e as contribuições de Engels (1975), Muraro (2003), Beauvoir (1982) e Belizário (2006), Giordani (2003), Del Priore (1990), Gebara (2000), Perrot (2003), Borin (2007), Jarsche e Nanjari (2008), dentre outros. Conclui-se que a dominação masculina foi uma criação do homem com o surgimento da família monogâmica e patriarcal, após o curto período de domínio do matriarcado, na fase pré-histórica. E, que, para a legitimação e a reprodução dessa estrutura social foi fundamental o papel da religião cristã, com a exortação à prática continuada de submissão e obediência da mulher ao homem que, por meio da violência simbólica, naturaliza e perpetua essa relação de poder. A libertação dessa dominação masculina só se pode realizar mediante a liberação dos homens das mesmas estruturas territoriais que contribuem para essa imposição. Se as mulheres são submetidas a um trabalho de socialização que as leva à diminuição e negação de suas virtudes, os homens também são prisioneiros dessa mesma estrutura, e, algumas vezes sem perceberem, sujeitos dessa mesma representação e violência. A reconstrução das territorialidades que resguardam a dignidade feminina passa, pois, pela reversão das estruturas sociais, que consagram e reproduzem o mito da inferioridade feminina em confronto com o homem. São muitas as conquistas obtidas pelos movimentos feministas no espaço social e político, mas também é verdadeiro que persiste a dominação masculina em todos os campos da vida da mulher. Afinal, se homens e mulheres nascem iguais como seres humanos, estes deveriam partilhar o mesmo território da igualdade. Faculdades ESTRodrigues, Maria ElizabethNascimento, Geraldo Barbosa doNonato, Eunice Maria Nazarethe2015-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/identidade/article/view/2524identidade!; v. 20, n. 1 (2015): Dôssie: Diversos e demais seções; 78-972178-437Xreponame:Identidade!instname:Faculdades ESTinstacron:ESTporhttp://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/identidade/article/view/2524/2390info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-09-01T23:30:09Zoai:www.est.edu.br/periodicos:article/2524Revistahttp://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/identidade/indexONGhttp://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/identidade/oai||selenir@est.edu.br|| reblin@est.edu.br2178-437X1676-9570opendoar:2015-09-01T23:30:09Identidade! - Faculdades ESTfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourse A dominação masculina e a violência simbólica contra a mulher no discurso religioso |
title |
The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourse |
spellingShingle |
The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourse Rodrigues, Maria Elizabeth Male Domination; Women; Symbolic Violence; Religion História; Antropologia; Educação; Psicologia Dominação Masculina; Mulher; Violência Simbólica; Religião |
title_short |
The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourse |
title_full |
The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourse |
title_fullStr |
The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourse |
title_full_unstemmed |
The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourse |
title_sort |
The masculine domination and the symbolic violence against the woman in the religious discourse |
author |
Rodrigues, Maria Elizabeth |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Maria Elizabeth Nascimento, Geraldo Barbosa do Nonato, Eunice Maria Nazarethe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nascimento, Geraldo Barbosa do Nonato, Eunice Maria Nazarethe |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Maria Elizabeth Nascimento, Geraldo Barbosa do Nonato, Eunice Maria Nazarethe |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Male Domination; Women; Symbolic Violence; Religion História; Antropologia; Educação; Psicologia Dominação Masculina; Mulher; Violência Simbólica; Religião |
topic |
Male Domination; Women; Symbolic Violence; Religion História; Antropologia; Educação; Psicologia Dominação Masculina; Mulher; Violência Simbólica; Religião |
description |
Violence against women, presented in this article, is a widely discussed topic in various areas of knowledge, among them the territorial studies, whose objectives are focused on finding solutions which envisage the promotion of women in society, as a person endowed with rights. This paper discusses male dominance which generates symbolic violence against women, present in religious discourse that legitimizes the process of male supremacy, from the historical context of the patriarchal family and the theory discussed by Pierre Bourdieu (2014). This work of Bourdieu presents important elements for analysis of the issue of male dominance in considering the existence of symbolic violence against women, on the assumption that Western societies cultivate the same principles rooted in the Kabyle society, in Algeria, where the author carried out this study, and consequently wrote the referenced book. The methodology used in this study was based on a literature review on the topic. We considered the descriptive perspective to the approach and contributions of Engels (1975), Muraro (2003), Beauvoir (1982) and Belizário (2006), Giordani (2003), Del Priori (1990), Gebara (2000), Perrot (2003), Borin (2007), and JarscheNanjari (2008), among others. It was concluded that male domination was a creation of man with the emergence of the monogamous and patriarchal family, after the short period of matriarchal dominance, in the prehistoric stage. And that, to legitimize and reproduce this social structure, the role of the Christian religion was fundamental with the exhortation to the continued practice of submission and obedience of women to men who, through the symbolic violence, naturalizes and perpetuates this power relationship. The liberation from this male domination can only occur through the liberation of men from the same territorial structures that contribute to this imposition. If women are subjected to a work of socialization that leads to the reduction and denial of their virtues, men are also prisoners of the same structure, and sometimes without realizing it, are subjects of this same representation and violence. The reconstruction of territoriality that protects women's dignity passes therefore through the reversal of social structures which provide and reproduce the myth of female inferiority in comparison with the man. There have been many advances made by feminist movements in the social and political space, but it is also true that there is still a male-domination in all fields of the life of women. After all, if men and women are created equal as human beings, they should share the same territory of equality. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08-31 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/identidade/article/view/2524 |
url |
http://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/identidade/article/view/2524 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/identidade/article/view/2524/2390 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdades EST |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdades EST |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
identidade!; v. 20, n. 1 (2015): Dôssie: Diversos e demais seções; 78-97 2178-437X reponame:Identidade! instname:Faculdades EST instacron:EST |
instname_str |
Faculdades EST |
instacron_str |
EST |
institution |
EST |
reponame_str |
Identidade! |
collection |
Identidade! |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Identidade! - Faculdades EST |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||selenir@est.edu.br|| reblin@est.edu.br |
_version_ |
1754122312332869632 |