WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Yuri
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Nunes, José A.C.C., El-Hani, Charbel Niño, Barros, Francisco
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Environmental Smoke
Texto Completo: https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/208
Resumo: How to clarify the relevance of research is a challenge for ecologists since this is not a trivial question for any scientist but may be especially difficult for early-career researchers, who often find more difficulty in providing answers that are synthetic, logical, and cogent. However, a clear answer to this question is critical for obtaining funding and is increasingly required by journal editors in order to send papers to review, let alone to attract readers to the published paper. Here, we argue that relevance should in fact appear in all steps of ecological research, including project preparation (e.g., for funding requests), manuscript submissions, oral communications, and also in media releases. Herein we discuss a framework for ecological relevance based on five key elements: clear connections with theory, knowledge gap, novelty, methodological innovation, and applicability. There are different ways of combining these elements, but in order to make the relevance of a study clear, ecologists should make explicit how these elements are connected with their main research question. Journal editors and grant agencies or donors decide on the relevance of the submitted works or proposals. We argue that categorically deciding whether or not an article is relevant is a delicate issue, particularly if one considers how scientific works can range from a gradient of no relevance to extreme relevance. We hope that with this simple “must-have argument list”, ecologists, especially in early careers, can enhance and show the relevance of their work in improving the field of ecology and, ultimately, human society.
id ES_ad1f65ec5646d066703f9706c6a61dba
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/208
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str Environmental Smoke
repository_id_str
spelling WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCEQUAL A RELEVÂNCIA DA SUA PESQUISA? UMA FERRAMENTA PARA CLARIFICAR A RELEVÂNCIA DA PESQUISA EM ECOLOGIAResearch RelevanceEcologyTheoryMethodologyApplicabilityRelevância da PesquisaEcologiaTeoriaMetodologiaAplicabilidadeHow to clarify the relevance of research is a challenge for ecologists since this is not a trivial question for any scientist but may be especially difficult for early-career researchers, who often find more difficulty in providing answers that are synthetic, logical, and cogent. However, a clear answer to this question is critical for obtaining funding and is increasingly required by journal editors in order to send papers to review, let alone to attract readers to the published paper. Here, we argue that relevance should in fact appear in all steps of ecological research, including project preparation (e.g., for funding requests), manuscript submissions, oral communications, and also in media releases. Herein we discuss a framework for ecological relevance based on five key elements: clear connections with theory, knowledge gap, novelty, methodological innovation, and applicability. There are different ways of combining these elements, but in order to make the relevance of a study clear, ecologists should make explicit how these elements are connected with their main research question. Journal editors and grant agencies or donors decide on the relevance of the submitted works or proposals. We argue that categorically deciding whether or not an article is relevant is a delicate issue, particularly if one considers how scientific works can range from a gradient of no relevance to extreme relevance. We hope that with this simple “must-have argument list”, ecologists, especially in early careers, can enhance and show the relevance of their work in improving the field of ecology and, ultimately, human society.Como esclarecer a relevância da pesquisa é um desafio para os ecólogos, pois essa não é uma questão trivial para nenhum cientista, mas pode ser especialmente difícil para pesquisadores em início de carreira, que muitas vezes encontram mais dificuldade em fornecer respostas sintéticas, lógicas e convincentes. No entanto, uma resposta clara a esta questão é fundamental para a obtenção de financiamento e é cada vez mais exigida pelos editores de periódicos para enviar artigos para revisão, quanto mais para atrair leitores para o artigo publicado. Aqui, argumentamos que a relevância deve de fato aparecer em todas as etapas da pesquisa ecológica, incluindo a preparação do projeto (por exemplo, para solicitações de financiamento), submissões de manuscritos, comunicações orais e também em comunicados à mídia. Aqui discutimos uma ferramenta para destacar a relevância ecológica com base em cinco elementos-chave: conexões claras com a teoria, lacuna de conhecimento, novidade, inovação metodológica e aplicabilidade. Existem diferentes formas de combinar esses elementos, mas para tornar clara a relevância de um estudo, os ecólogos devem deixar explícito como esses elementos estão conectados com sua principal questão de pesquisa. Editores de periódicos e agências de financiamento ou doadores decidem com base na relevância dos trabalhos ou propostas apresentados. Argumentamos que decidir categoricamente se um artigo é relevante ou não é uma questão delicada, principalmente se considerarmos como os trabalhos científicos podem variar de um gradiente de nenhuma relevância à extrema relevância. Esperamos que com esta simples “lista de argumentos obrigatórios”, ecólogos, especialmente em início de carreira, possam aprimorar e mostrar a relevância de seu trabalho melhorando o campo da ecologia e, em última análise, a sociedade como um todo.Environmental Smoke Institute2022-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/20810.32435/envsmoke.2022537-12Environmental Smoke; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022); 7-12Environmental Smoke; v. 5 n. 3 (2022); 7-122595-5527reponame:Environmental Smokeinstname:Environmental Smokeinstacron:ESenghttps://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/208/176https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/208/183Copyright (c) 2022 Yuri Costa, José A.C.C. Nunes, Charbel Niño El-Hani, Francisco Barroshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, YuriNunes, José A.C.C.El-Hani, Charbel NiñoBarros, Francisco2023-01-19T21:30:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/208Revistahttps://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmokePRIhttps://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/oaismoke@environmentalsmoke.com.br2595-55272595-5527opendoar:2023-01-19T21:30:47Environmental Smoke - Environmental Smokefalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCE
QUAL A RELEVÂNCIA DA SUA PESQUISA? UMA FERRAMENTA PARA CLARIFICAR A RELEVÂNCIA DA PESQUISA EM ECOLOGIA
title WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCE
spellingShingle WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCE
Costa, Yuri
Research Relevance
Ecology
Theory
Methodology
Applicability
Relevância da Pesquisa
Ecologia
Teoria
Metodologia
Aplicabilidade
title_short WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCE
title_full WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCE
title_fullStr WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCE
title_full_unstemmed WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCE
title_sort WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR RESEARCH? A FRAMEWORK FOR CLEAR ECOLOGICAL RELEVANCE
author Costa, Yuri
author_facet Costa, Yuri
Nunes, José A.C.C.
El-Hani, Charbel Niño
Barros, Francisco
author_role author
author2 Nunes, José A.C.C.
El-Hani, Charbel Niño
Barros, Francisco
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Yuri
Nunes, José A.C.C.
El-Hani, Charbel Niño
Barros, Francisco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Research Relevance
Ecology
Theory
Methodology
Applicability
Relevância da Pesquisa
Ecologia
Teoria
Metodologia
Aplicabilidade
topic Research Relevance
Ecology
Theory
Methodology
Applicability
Relevância da Pesquisa
Ecologia
Teoria
Metodologia
Aplicabilidade
description How to clarify the relevance of research is a challenge for ecologists since this is not a trivial question for any scientist but may be especially difficult for early-career researchers, who often find more difficulty in providing answers that are synthetic, logical, and cogent. However, a clear answer to this question is critical for obtaining funding and is increasingly required by journal editors in order to send papers to review, let alone to attract readers to the published paper. Here, we argue that relevance should in fact appear in all steps of ecological research, including project preparation (e.g., for funding requests), manuscript submissions, oral communications, and also in media releases. Herein we discuss a framework for ecological relevance based on five key elements: clear connections with theory, knowledge gap, novelty, methodological innovation, and applicability. There are different ways of combining these elements, but in order to make the relevance of a study clear, ecologists should make explicit how these elements are connected with their main research question. Journal editors and grant agencies or donors decide on the relevance of the submitted works or proposals. We argue that categorically deciding whether or not an article is relevant is a delicate issue, particularly if one considers how scientific works can range from a gradient of no relevance to extreme relevance. We hope that with this simple “must-have argument list”, ecologists, especially in early careers, can enhance and show the relevance of their work in improving the field of ecology and, ultimately, human society.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/208
10.32435/envsmoke.2022537-12
url https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/208
identifier_str_mv 10.32435/envsmoke.2022537-12
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/208/176
https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/208/183
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Yuri Costa, José A.C.C. Nunes, Charbel Niño El-Hani, Francisco Barros
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Yuri Costa, José A.C.C. Nunes, Charbel Niño El-Hani, Francisco Barros
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Environmental Smoke Institute
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Environmental Smoke Institute
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Environmental Smoke; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022); 7-12
Environmental Smoke; v. 5 n. 3 (2022); 7-12
2595-5527
reponame:Environmental Smoke
instname:Environmental Smoke
instacron:ES
instname_str Environmental Smoke
instacron_str ES
institution ES
reponame_str Environmental Smoke
collection Environmental Smoke
repository.name.fl_str_mv Environmental Smoke - Environmental Smoke
repository.mail.fl_str_mv smoke@environmentalsmoke.com.br
_version_ 1797051134501715968