Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Letícia Roberta de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Sánchez, Yenicel Quevedo, Braga, Thamara Silva, Moura Neto, Gastão, Moura, Renata Furquim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/206
Resumo: Introduction: Orthognathic surgery (OS) is used to improve the patient's facial appearance and to correct maxillary and mandibular deformities resulting from malocclusions, disease, or trauma. In this context, genioplasty is a procedure to correct an aesthetic and functional deformity of the chin region, improving the contour. Moreover, anterior open bite (AOB) is the lack of vertical contact or negative overbite between the anterior teeth of the superior and inferior arches when the posterior teeth are in occlusion. Objective: The present study aimed to perform a brief systematic review with risk of bias analysis by funnel plot to highlight the main clinical approaches of orthognathic surgery in class II patients with open bites and also concerning genioplasty. Methods: The research was carried out from February 2022 to May 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 115 articles were found. In total, 57 articles were fully evaluated and 34 were included and evaluated in this study. And of the total of 34 articles, only 11 articles were developed as the main clinical results. A total of 32 articles were excluded because they did not meet the GRADE classification, and 16 were excluded because they were at risk of bias. The symmetric funnel plot does not suggest a risk of bias between the small sample size studies. A retrospective observational study compared 57 patient charts on treatment outcomes for anterior occlusion and vertical skeletal stability after maxillary or mandibular surgery to correct Class II malocclusion with a mild to moderate open bite. After surgery, 87% of Le Fort I patients and 63% of patients with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy had a positive overbite, and at the 6-month follow-up, the percentages were 90% and 74%, respectively. Another study showed Class II patients had significantly greater amounts of lateral and lower translation than class III patients. Also, genioplasty represents one of the most common auxiliary procedures and may be associated with corrective surgery for dentofacial dysmorphisms. However, care must be taken with mental nerve injuries, asymmetries, and intraoperative bleeding are the main immediate complications.
id FACERES-1_9761189bd69a773c8ac49d9f09008e64
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/206
network_acronym_str FACERES-1
network_name_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic reviewOrthognathic surgeryClass IIOpen biteGenioplastyAestheticsClinical trialsIntroduction: Orthognathic surgery (OS) is used to improve the patient's facial appearance and to correct maxillary and mandibular deformities resulting from malocclusions, disease, or trauma. In this context, genioplasty is a procedure to correct an aesthetic and functional deformity of the chin region, improving the contour. Moreover, anterior open bite (AOB) is the lack of vertical contact or negative overbite between the anterior teeth of the superior and inferior arches when the posterior teeth are in occlusion. Objective: The present study aimed to perform a brief systematic review with risk of bias analysis by funnel plot to highlight the main clinical approaches of orthognathic surgery in class II patients with open bites and also concerning genioplasty. Methods: The research was carried out from February 2022 to May 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 115 articles were found. In total, 57 articles were fully evaluated and 34 were included and evaluated in this study. And of the total of 34 articles, only 11 articles were developed as the main clinical results. A total of 32 articles were excluded because they did not meet the GRADE classification, and 16 were excluded because they were at risk of bias. The symmetric funnel plot does not suggest a risk of bias between the small sample size studies. A retrospective observational study compared 57 patient charts on treatment outcomes for anterior occlusion and vertical skeletal stability after maxillary or mandibular surgery to correct Class II malocclusion with a mild to moderate open bite. After surgery, 87% of Le Fort I patients and 63% of patients with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy had a positive overbite, and at the 6-month follow-up, the percentages were 90% and 74%, respectively. Another study showed Class II patients had significantly greater amounts of lateral and lower translation than class III patients. Also, genioplasty represents one of the most common auxiliary procedures and may be associated with corrective surgery for dentofacial dysmorphisms. However, care must be taken with mental nerve injuries, asymmetries, and intraoperative bleeding are the main immediate complications.Faceres2022-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/20610.54448/mdnt22310MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): MedNEXT - August 2022MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. 3 (2022): MedNEXT - August 20222763-567810.54448/mdnt223reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/206/195Copyright (c) 2022 Letícia Roberta de Oliveira, Yenicel Quevedo Sánchez, Thamara Silva Braga, Gastão Moura Neto, Renata Furquim Mourahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Letícia Roberta deSánchez, Yenicel QuevedoBraga, Thamara SilvaMoura Neto, GastãoMoura, Renata Furquim2022-08-28T13:53:30Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/206Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2022-08-28T13:53:30MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review
title Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review
spellingShingle Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review
Oliveira, Letícia Roberta de
Orthognathic surgery
Class II
Open bite
Genioplasty
Aesthetics
Clinical trials
title_short Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review
title_full Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review
title_fullStr Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review
title_sort Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review
author Oliveira, Letícia Roberta de
author_facet Oliveira, Letícia Roberta de
Sánchez, Yenicel Quevedo
Braga, Thamara Silva
Moura Neto, Gastão
Moura, Renata Furquim
author_role author
author2 Sánchez, Yenicel Quevedo
Braga, Thamara Silva
Moura Neto, Gastão
Moura, Renata Furquim
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Letícia Roberta de
Sánchez, Yenicel Quevedo
Braga, Thamara Silva
Moura Neto, Gastão
Moura, Renata Furquim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthognathic surgery
Class II
Open bite
Genioplasty
Aesthetics
Clinical trials
topic Orthognathic surgery
Class II
Open bite
Genioplasty
Aesthetics
Clinical trials
description Introduction: Orthognathic surgery (OS) is used to improve the patient's facial appearance and to correct maxillary and mandibular deformities resulting from malocclusions, disease, or trauma. In this context, genioplasty is a procedure to correct an aesthetic and functional deformity of the chin region, improving the contour. Moreover, anterior open bite (AOB) is the lack of vertical contact or negative overbite between the anterior teeth of the superior and inferior arches when the posterior teeth are in occlusion. Objective: The present study aimed to perform a brief systematic review with risk of bias analysis by funnel plot to highlight the main clinical approaches of orthognathic surgery in class II patients with open bites and also concerning genioplasty. Methods: The research was carried out from February 2022 to May 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 115 articles were found. In total, 57 articles were fully evaluated and 34 were included and evaluated in this study. And of the total of 34 articles, only 11 articles were developed as the main clinical results. A total of 32 articles were excluded because they did not meet the GRADE classification, and 16 were excluded because they were at risk of bias. The symmetric funnel plot does not suggest a risk of bias between the small sample size studies. A retrospective observational study compared 57 patient charts on treatment outcomes for anterior occlusion and vertical skeletal stability after maxillary or mandibular surgery to correct Class II malocclusion with a mild to moderate open bite. After surgery, 87% of Le Fort I patients and 63% of patients with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy had a positive overbite, and at the 6-month follow-up, the percentages were 90% and 74%, respectively. Another study showed Class II patients had significantly greater amounts of lateral and lower translation than class III patients. Also, genioplasty represents one of the most common auxiliary procedures and may be associated with corrective surgery for dentofacial dysmorphisms. However, care must be taken with mental nerve injuries, asymmetries, and intraoperative bleeding are the main immediate complications.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/206
10.54448/mdnt22310
url https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/206
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/mdnt22310
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/206/195
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): MedNEXT - August 2022
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. 3 (2022): MedNEXT - August 2022
2763-5678
10.54448/mdnt223
reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron:FACERES
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron_str FACERES
institution FACERES
reponame_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
collection MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1796798220065570816