Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martin, Natália Roberta
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Furtado, Lucas, Manzini, Régis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/189
Resumo: Introduction: In the context of oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthognathic surgery (OS) is used to improve the patient's facial appearance and to correct maxillary and mandibular deformities resulting from malocclusions, disease, or trauma. Objective: It was carried out a concise systematic review of the main clinical approaches to genioplasty (genioplasty), as well as the results of more current clinical studies, to show the state of the art of this surgery. Methods: The rules of the Systematic Review-PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from February 2022 to May 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 108 articles were found. In total, 68 articles were fully evaluated and 23 were included and evaluated in this study. And of the total of 23 articles, only 09 articles were developed as the main clinical results. A total of 16 articles were excluded because they did not meet the GRADE classification, and 45 were excluded because they were at risk of bias. Mentoplasty represents one of the most common auxiliary procedures and may be associated with corrective surgery for dentofacial dysmorphisms. However, care must be taken with mental nerve injuries, asymmetries, and intraoperative bleeding are the main immediate complications of mentoplasty, and to minimize these risks, the ultrasonic piezoelectric osteotomy with the selective cutting of the mineralized structure stands out. Furthermore, one-piece mentoplasty based on a three-dimensional impression model proved to be very successful for the natural modeling of the mandible. Also, it has been shown that the use of piezotomes is advantageous in mentoplasty surgery compared to traditional surgical instruments. In the context of hylotherapy, the results of the study indicate slightly less residual edema at 18°C temperature on the 30th postoperative day. Finally, in orthognathic surgery, a fibrinolytic shutdown is significantly amplified by tranexamic acid.
id FACERES-1_c06628faf0b572a095681055ee8f13da
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/189
network_acronym_str FACERES-1
network_name_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic reviewOral and maxillofacial surgeryMentoplastyGenioplastyAestheticsClinical trialsIntroduction: In the context of oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthognathic surgery (OS) is used to improve the patient's facial appearance and to correct maxillary and mandibular deformities resulting from malocclusions, disease, or trauma. Objective: It was carried out a concise systematic review of the main clinical approaches to genioplasty (genioplasty), as well as the results of more current clinical studies, to show the state of the art of this surgery. Methods: The rules of the Systematic Review-PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from February 2022 to May 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 108 articles were found. In total, 68 articles were fully evaluated and 23 were included and evaluated in this study. And of the total of 23 articles, only 09 articles were developed as the main clinical results. A total of 16 articles were excluded because they did not meet the GRADE classification, and 45 were excluded because they were at risk of bias. Mentoplasty represents one of the most common auxiliary procedures and may be associated with corrective surgery for dentofacial dysmorphisms. However, care must be taken with mental nerve injuries, asymmetries, and intraoperative bleeding are the main immediate complications of mentoplasty, and to minimize these risks, the ultrasonic piezoelectric osteotomy with the selective cutting of the mineralized structure stands out. Furthermore, one-piece mentoplasty based on a three-dimensional impression model proved to be very successful for the natural modeling of the mandible. Also, it has been shown that the use of piezotomes is advantageous in mentoplasty surgery compared to traditional surgical instruments. In the context of hylotherapy, the results of the study indicate slightly less residual edema at 18°C temperature on the 30th postoperative day. Finally, in orthognathic surgery, a fibrinolytic shutdown is significantly amplified by tranexamic acid.Faceres2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/18910.54448/mdnt22S321MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 20222763-5678reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/189/178Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartin, Natália RobertaFurtado, LucasManzini, Régis2022-06-01T14:23:01Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/189Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2022-06-01T14:23:01MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic review
title Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic review
spellingShingle Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic review
Martin, Natália Roberta
Oral and maxillofacial surgery
Mentoplasty
Genioplasty
Aesthetics
Clinical trials
title_short Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic review
title_full Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic review
title_fullStr Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic review
title_sort Major clinical results of mentoplasty: a systematic review
author Martin, Natália Roberta
author_facet Martin, Natália Roberta
Furtado, Lucas
Manzini, Régis
author_role author
author2 Furtado, Lucas
Manzini, Régis
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martin, Natália Roberta
Furtado, Lucas
Manzini, Régis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Oral and maxillofacial surgery
Mentoplasty
Genioplasty
Aesthetics
Clinical trials
topic Oral and maxillofacial surgery
Mentoplasty
Genioplasty
Aesthetics
Clinical trials
description Introduction: In the context of oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthognathic surgery (OS) is used to improve the patient's facial appearance and to correct maxillary and mandibular deformities resulting from malocclusions, disease, or trauma. Objective: It was carried out a concise systematic review of the main clinical approaches to genioplasty (genioplasty), as well as the results of more current clinical studies, to show the state of the art of this surgery. Methods: The rules of the Systematic Review-PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from February 2022 to May 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 108 articles were found. In total, 68 articles were fully evaluated and 23 were included and evaluated in this study. And of the total of 23 articles, only 09 articles were developed as the main clinical results. A total of 16 articles were excluded because they did not meet the GRADE classification, and 45 were excluded because they were at risk of bias. Mentoplasty represents one of the most common auxiliary procedures and may be associated with corrective surgery for dentofacial dysmorphisms. However, care must be taken with mental nerve injuries, asymmetries, and intraoperative bleeding are the main immediate complications of mentoplasty, and to minimize these risks, the ultrasonic piezoelectric osteotomy with the selective cutting of the mineralized structure stands out. Furthermore, one-piece mentoplasty based on a three-dimensional impression model proved to be very successful for the natural modeling of the mandible. Also, it has been shown that the use of piezotomes is advantageous in mentoplasty surgery compared to traditional surgical instruments. In the context of hylotherapy, the results of the study indicate slightly less residual edema at 18°C temperature on the 30th postoperative day. Finally, in orthognathic surgery, a fibrinolytic shutdown is significantly amplified by tranexamic acid.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/189
10.54448/mdnt22S321
url https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/189
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/mdnt22S321
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/189/178
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022
2763-5678
reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron:FACERES
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron_str FACERES
institution FACERES
reponame_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
collection MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1796798220029919232