Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jesus, Paola Martins de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Tibiriçá, Giovana Bueno, Souza, Mariana de, Scriboni, Andreia Borges
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/314
Resumo: Introduction: Over the past three decades, the number of dental implant procedures has been around one million dental implants per year. The development of biomaterials for use in clinical dentistry is a powerful therapeutic instrument in the correction of bone defects. Objective: It was to carry out a concise systematic review of bone regeneration processes using biomaterials and the main molecular and cellular constituents for implant dentistry. Methods: The survey was carried out from May to July 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scielo databases, using older scientific articles with a gold standard reference up to 2023. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias by the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: It was found 162 studies that underwent eligibility analysis. The final sample had 31 eligible studies that were described in the systematic review. Most studies showed homogeneity in their results, with I2 =24.9% <25%. Due to bone regeneration and biological barriers in graft surgeries, there has been a technological growth of these materials as they point to potential tools for treating bone loss. The greater potential of guided bone regeneration was associated with the graft material due to the higher grade of vital bone and the lower percentage of residual graft particles. All studied bone substitute materials resulted in efficient bone formation for dental implants and alveolar ridge preservation procedures. It was concluded that bioengineering and cell therapy work together for regenerative dentistry, favoring and improving biological conditions to accelerate tissue repair and regeneration and, thus, naturally maintaining tissue homeostasis. This condition is maintained because the required cellular elements are provided, the cell proliferation and differentiation factors, and supramolecular structures that guarantee the functional stereochemical organization of the generated tissues and their systemic integration.
id FACERES-1_a95545ff8e2b6cfbf4932cdba1ad7c73
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/314
network_acronym_str FACERES-1
network_name_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic reviewBone regenerationBiomaterialsDental implantsImplant dentistryIntroduction: Over the past three decades, the number of dental implant procedures has been around one million dental implants per year. The development of biomaterials for use in clinical dentistry is a powerful therapeutic instrument in the correction of bone defects. Objective: It was to carry out a concise systematic review of bone regeneration processes using biomaterials and the main molecular and cellular constituents for implant dentistry. Methods: The survey was carried out from May to July 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scielo databases, using older scientific articles with a gold standard reference up to 2023. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias by the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: It was found 162 studies that underwent eligibility analysis. The final sample had 31 eligible studies that were described in the systematic review. Most studies showed homogeneity in their results, with I2 =24.9% <25%. Due to bone regeneration and biological barriers in graft surgeries, there has been a technological growth of these materials as they point to potential tools for treating bone loss. The greater potential of guided bone regeneration was associated with the graft material due to the higher grade of vital bone and the lower percentage of residual graft particles. All studied bone substitute materials resulted in efficient bone formation for dental implants and alveolar ridge preservation procedures. It was concluded that bioengineering and cell therapy work together for regenerative dentistry, favoring and improving biological conditions to accelerate tissue repair and regeneration and, thus, naturally maintaining tissue homeostasis. This condition is maintained because the required cellular elements are provided, the cell proliferation and differentiation factors, and supramolecular structures that guarantee the functional stereochemical organization of the generated tissues and their systemic integration.MetaScience Press2023-08-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/31410.54448/mdnt23S304MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 4 No. S3 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - August 2023MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 4 n. S3 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - August 20232763-5678reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/314/300Copyright (c) 2023 Paola Martins de Jesus, Giovana Bueno Tibiriçá, Mariana de Souza, Andreia Borges Scribonihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJesus, Paola Martins de Tibiriçá, Giovana BuenoSouza, Mariana deScriboni, Andreia Borges2023-08-16T21:38:04Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/314Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2023-08-16T21:38:04MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
spellingShingle Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
Jesus, Paola Martins de
Bone regeneration
Biomaterials
Dental implants
Implant dentistry
title_short Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title_full Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title_fullStr Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title_sort Major clinical findings of bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
author Jesus, Paola Martins de
author_facet Jesus, Paola Martins de
Tibiriçá, Giovana Bueno
Souza, Mariana de
Scriboni, Andreia Borges
author_role author
author2 Tibiriçá, Giovana Bueno
Souza, Mariana de
Scriboni, Andreia Borges
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jesus, Paola Martins de
Tibiriçá, Giovana Bueno
Souza, Mariana de
Scriboni, Andreia Borges
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone regeneration
Biomaterials
Dental implants
Implant dentistry
topic Bone regeneration
Biomaterials
Dental implants
Implant dentistry
description Introduction: Over the past three decades, the number of dental implant procedures has been around one million dental implants per year. The development of biomaterials for use in clinical dentistry is a powerful therapeutic instrument in the correction of bone defects. Objective: It was to carry out a concise systematic review of bone regeneration processes using biomaterials and the main molecular and cellular constituents for implant dentistry. Methods: The survey was carried out from May to July 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scielo databases, using older scientific articles with a gold standard reference up to 2023. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias by the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: It was found 162 studies that underwent eligibility analysis. The final sample had 31 eligible studies that were described in the systematic review. Most studies showed homogeneity in their results, with I2 =24.9% <25%. Due to bone regeneration and biological barriers in graft surgeries, there has been a technological growth of these materials as they point to potential tools for treating bone loss. The greater potential of guided bone regeneration was associated with the graft material due to the higher grade of vital bone and the lower percentage of residual graft particles. All studied bone substitute materials resulted in efficient bone formation for dental implants and alveolar ridge preservation procedures. It was concluded that bioengineering and cell therapy work together for regenerative dentistry, favoring and improving biological conditions to accelerate tissue repair and regeneration and, thus, naturally maintaining tissue homeostasis. This condition is maintained because the required cellular elements are provided, the cell proliferation and differentiation factors, and supramolecular structures that guarantee the functional stereochemical organization of the generated tissues and their systemic integration.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/314
10.54448/mdnt23S304
url https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/314
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/mdnt23S304
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/314/300
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 4 No. S3 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - August 2023
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 4 n. S3 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - August 2023
2763-5678
reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron:FACERES
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron_str FACERES
institution FACERES
reponame_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
collection MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1796798218287185920