Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Esteves, Maria Eduarda Tamura
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Bianchini, Ruana Molina Garcia, Gonzatti, João Pedro Pereira, Scriboni, Andreia Borges
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308
Resumo: Introduction: The rehabilitation of the dental arch with osseointegrated implants makes it possible to improve the quality of life of patients. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been applied to replace lost bone to allow the implant to be fully integrated and maintained during functional loading. GBR is considered one of the most commonly applied methods to reconstruct alveolar bone and to treat peri-implant bone deficiencies. Objective: It was to develop a systematic review to highlight the main approaches of guided surgery to promote bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The search was carried out from March to May 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases, using articles from 1977 (Golden pattern - Bra°nemark et al. ) to 2023. Results and Conclusion: A total of 117 articles were found, 38 articles were evaluated and 28 were included and developed in this systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 15 studies that did not meet GRADE. It was concluded that the application of a membrane to prevent nonosteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a fundamental principle. Membrane properties and biological outcomes drive bone regeneration in membrane-covered defects. Barrier membranes play the role of preventing the invasion of soft tissue by exiting the mucosa and creating an underlying space to support bone growth. Collagen membranes have excellent biological properties and bone regeneration results. While collagen membranes do not provide sufficient mechanical protection of the covered bone defect, titanium-reinforced membranes, and non-resorbable membranes need to be removed in a second surgery.
id FACERES-1_d0c7dce5b2d16613854e7a1857ea0dc7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/308
network_acronym_str FACERES-1
network_name_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic reviewBone regenerationGuided bone regenerationImplant dentistryBiomaterials. MembranesIntroduction: The rehabilitation of the dental arch with osseointegrated implants makes it possible to improve the quality of life of patients. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been applied to replace lost bone to allow the implant to be fully integrated and maintained during functional loading. GBR is considered one of the most commonly applied methods to reconstruct alveolar bone and to treat peri-implant bone deficiencies. Objective: It was to develop a systematic review to highlight the main approaches of guided surgery to promote bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The search was carried out from March to May 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases, using articles from 1977 (Golden pattern - Bra°nemark et al. ) to 2023. Results and Conclusion: A total of 117 articles were found, 38 articles were evaluated and 28 were included and developed in this systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 15 studies that did not meet GRADE. It was concluded that the application of a membrane to prevent nonosteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a fundamental principle. Membrane properties and biological outcomes drive bone regeneration in membrane-covered defects. Barrier membranes play the role of preventing the invasion of soft tissue by exiting the mucosa and creating an underlying space to support bone growth. Collagen membranes have excellent biological properties and bone regeneration results. While collagen membranes do not provide sufficient mechanical protection of the covered bone defect, titanium-reinforced membranes, and non-resorbable membranes need to be removed in a second surgery.MetaScience Press2023-07-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/30810.54448/mdnt23S221MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 4 No. S2 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 2 - March 2023MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 4 n. S2 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 2 - March 20232763-567810.54448/mdnt23S2reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308/293Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Eduarda Tamura Esteves, Ruana Molina Garcia Bianchini, João Pedro Pereira Gonzatti, Andreia Borges Scribonihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsteves, Maria Eduarda TamuraBianchini, Ruana Molina GarciaGonzatti, João Pedro PereiraScriboni, Andreia Borges2024-01-23T15:24:19Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/308Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2024-01-23T15:24:19MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
spellingShingle Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
Esteves, Maria Eduarda Tamura
Bone regeneration
Guided bone regeneration
Implant dentistry
Biomaterials. Membranes
title_short Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title_full Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title_fullStr Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
title_sort Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
author Esteves, Maria Eduarda Tamura
author_facet Esteves, Maria Eduarda Tamura
Bianchini, Ruana Molina Garcia
Gonzatti, João Pedro Pereira
Scriboni, Andreia Borges
author_role author
author2 Bianchini, Ruana Molina Garcia
Gonzatti, João Pedro Pereira
Scriboni, Andreia Borges
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Esteves, Maria Eduarda Tamura
Bianchini, Ruana Molina Garcia
Gonzatti, João Pedro Pereira
Scriboni, Andreia Borges
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone regeneration
Guided bone regeneration
Implant dentistry
Biomaterials. Membranes
topic Bone regeneration
Guided bone regeneration
Implant dentistry
Biomaterials. Membranes
description Introduction: The rehabilitation of the dental arch with osseointegrated implants makes it possible to improve the quality of life of patients. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been applied to replace lost bone to allow the implant to be fully integrated and maintained during functional loading. GBR is considered one of the most commonly applied methods to reconstruct alveolar bone and to treat peri-implant bone deficiencies. Objective: It was to develop a systematic review to highlight the main approaches of guided surgery to promote bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The search was carried out from March to May 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases, using articles from 1977 (Golden pattern - Bra°nemark et al. ) to 2023. Results and Conclusion: A total of 117 articles were found, 38 articles were evaluated and 28 were included and developed in this systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 15 studies that did not meet GRADE. It was concluded that the application of a membrane to prevent nonosteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a fundamental principle. Membrane properties and biological outcomes drive bone regeneration in membrane-covered defects. Barrier membranes play the role of preventing the invasion of soft tissue by exiting the mucosa and creating an underlying space to support bone growth. Collagen membranes have excellent biological properties and bone regeneration results. While collagen membranes do not provide sufficient mechanical protection of the covered bone defect, titanium-reinforced membranes, and non-resorbable membranes need to be removed in a second surgery.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308
10.54448/mdnt23S221
url https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/mdnt23S221
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308/293
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 4 No. S2 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 2 - March 2023
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 4 n. S2 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 2 - March 2023
2763-5678
10.54448/mdnt23S2
reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron:FACERES
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron_str FACERES
institution FACERES
reponame_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
collection MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1796798218273554432