Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/186 |
Resumo: | Introduction: In the context of tooth extraction and aesthetic care, steps are needed for tooth extraction. Alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction often leads to situations where the long-term function and esthetic success of dental implant restorations is a challenge. Thus, the Socket shield has been described as an alternative technique to maintain the alveolar ridge in the placement of immediate implants. Objective: Conducted a concise systematic review of key considerations and clinical outcomes of minimally traumatic treatment of tooth extraction and dental implants. Methods: The present study followed a concise systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The present study was carried out from January to March 2022. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 112 articles were found. A total of 47 articles were fully evaluated and 26 were included in this study. The results suggest that the adjunctive use of connective tissue grafting is not mandatory to achieve successful esthetic results for well-planned immediate implant placement with non-functional immediate provisional restoration in a fresh extraction socket. Still, the success/modified success rate, survival, mean resorption of the oral plate, and patient satisfaction, there were no differences between immediate implants placed with a flap or with an envelope flap of minimal thickness. |
id |
FACERES-1_abd132276845a668140e4a8d51c5b6d1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/186 |
network_acronym_str |
FACERES-1 |
network_name_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic reviewExodontiaDental implantDental extractionMinimally traumatic extractionAestheticsIntroduction: In the context of tooth extraction and aesthetic care, steps are needed for tooth extraction. Alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction often leads to situations where the long-term function and esthetic success of dental implant restorations is a challenge. Thus, the Socket shield has been described as an alternative technique to maintain the alveolar ridge in the placement of immediate implants. Objective: Conducted a concise systematic review of key considerations and clinical outcomes of minimally traumatic treatment of tooth extraction and dental implants. Methods: The present study followed a concise systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The present study was carried out from January to March 2022. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 112 articles were found. A total of 47 articles were fully evaluated and 26 were included in this study. The results suggest that the adjunctive use of connective tissue grafting is not mandatory to achieve successful esthetic results for well-planned immediate implant placement with non-functional immediate provisional restoration in a fresh extraction socket. Still, the success/modified success rate, survival, mean resorption of the oral plate, and patient satisfaction, there were no differences between immediate implants placed with a flap or with an envelope flap of minimal thickness.Faceres2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/18610.54448/mdnt22S318MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 20222763-5678reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/186/175Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Larissa GalindoSilva dos Reis, Welinton RafaelParra, Marianna de PaivaKassis, Elias Naim2022-06-01T13:57:07Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/186Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2022-06-01T13:57:07MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic review |
title |
Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic review Gonçalves, Larissa Galindo Exodontia Dental implant Dental extraction Minimally traumatic extraction Aesthetics |
title_short |
Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic review |
title_full |
Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic review |
title_sort |
Clinical investigation of the main approaches to exodontics and aesthetic preservation for the dental implant: a concise systematic review |
author |
Gonçalves, Larissa Galindo |
author_facet |
Gonçalves, Larissa Galindo Silva dos Reis, Welinton Rafael Parra, Marianna de Paiva Kassis, Elias Naim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva dos Reis, Welinton Rafael Parra, Marianna de Paiva Kassis, Elias Naim |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves, Larissa Galindo Silva dos Reis, Welinton Rafael Parra, Marianna de Paiva Kassis, Elias Naim |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Exodontia Dental implant Dental extraction Minimally traumatic extraction Aesthetics |
topic |
Exodontia Dental implant Dental extraction Minimally traumatic extraction Aesthetics |
description |
Introduction: In the context of tooth extraction and aesthetic care, steps are needed for tooth extraction. Alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction often leads to situations where the long-term function and esthetic success of dental implant restorations is a challenge. Thus, the Socket shield has been described as an alternative technique to maintain the alveolar ridge in the placement of immediate implants. Objective: Conducted a concise systematic review of key considerations and clinical outcomes of minimally traumatic treatment of tooth extraction and dental implants. Methods: The present study followed a concise systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The present study was carried out from January to March 2022. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 112 articles were found. A total of 47 articles were fully evaluated and 26 were included in this study. The results suggest that the adjunctive use of connective tissue grafting is not mandatory to achieve successful esthetic results for well-planned immediate implant placement with non-functional immediate provisional restoration in a fresh extraction socket. Still, the success/modified success rate, survival, mean resorption of the oral plate, and patient satisfaction, there were no differences between immediate implants placed with a flap or with an envelope flap of minimal thickness. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/186 10.54448/mdnt22S318 |
url |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/186 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.54448/mdnt22S318 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/186/175 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faceres |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faceres |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022 2763-5678 reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) instacron:FACERES |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
instacron_str |
FACERES |
institution |
FACERES |
reponame_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
collection |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com |
_version_ |
1796798220023627776 |