Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel Data
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/686 |
Resumo: | This work aimed to verify, based on the open innovation strategy, how different types of interactions with external actors (customers, competitors, suppliers, universities, and consultants) influence different types of innovations (general innovations, product innovations, and technological innovations) implemented by organizations. The panel data technique was used for analysis, based on PINTEC data, an innovation survey conducted by IBGE, which referred to the years 2003, 2005, 2008, 2011, and 2014. Regarding the innovations implemented by organizations, no type of interaction was significant for the general innovations or interactions with consultants, and suppliers were negative for product innovation. Finally, interaction with customers was positive while interaction with universities was negative for technological innovations. Thus, the results were essential to proving that different forms of cooperation have different impacts on the implementation of different types of innovation by organizations. |
id |
FBS-1_b3d4197eb2066aa3e3444ad11368567e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/686 |
network_acronym_str |
FBS-1 |
network_name_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel DataInovação Aberta e Implementação de Diferentes tipos de Inovação: Uma Análise Baseada em Dados em PainelOpen InnovationInnovationCooperationPINTEC 2014Panel Data AnalysisInovação AbertaInovaçãoCooperaçãoPINTECDados em PainelThis work aimed to verify, based on the open innovation strategy, how different types of interactions with external actors (customers, competitors, suppliers, universities, and consultants) influence different types of innovations (general innovations, product innovations, and technological innovations) implemented by organizations. The panel data technique was used for analysis, based on PINTEC data, an innovation survey conducted by IBGE, which referred to the years 2003, 2005, 2008, 2011, and 2014. Regarding the innovations implemented by organizations, no type of interaction was significant for the general innovations or interactions with consultants, and suppliers were negative for product innovation. Finally, interaction with customers was positive while interaction with universities was negative for technological innovations. Thus, the results were essential to proving that different forms of cooperation have different impacts on the implementation of different types of innovation by organizations.Este trabalho objetivou verificar, a partir da estratégia de inovação aberta, como diferentes tipos de interação com atores externos (clientes, concorrentes, fornecedores, universidades e consultores) influenciam diferentes tipos de inovações (inovações gerais, inovações de produto e inovações tecnológicas) implementadas pelas organizações. Para análise, utilizou-se a técnica de dados em painel, com base em dados da PINTEC, uma pesquisa de inovação do IBGE, referente aos anos de 2003, 2005, 2008, 2011 e 2014. Com relação às inovações gerais implementadas pelas organizações, verificou-se que nenhum tipo de interação foi significativo, enquanto para a inovação de produto, observou-se que as interações tanto com consultores quanto com fornecedores foram negativas, e, por fim, com relação à inovação tecnológica, verificou-se que a interação com clientes foi positiva e a interação com universidades foi negativa. Desse modo, os resultados foram essenciais para comprovar que formas variadas de cooperação impactam de forma diferente a implementação de diferentes tipos de inovação pelas organizações.FUCAPE Business Shool2022-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtigo revisado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/68610.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.3Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022): January to February 2022; 39-58Brazilian Business Review; v. 19 n. 1 (2022): Janeiro a Fevereiro de 2022; 39-581808-23861807-734Xreponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)instacron:FBSengporhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/686/1036http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/686/1037Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Business Reviewhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, HumbertoÁvila, EdnilsonPereira, RafaelZambalde, André2022-05-02T19:28:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/686Revistahttps://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/indexONGhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/oai|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br1808-23861808-2386opendoar:2022-05-02T19:28:23BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel Data Inovação Aberta e Implementação de Diferentes tipos de Inovação: Uma Análise Baseada em Dados em Painel |
title |
Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel Data |
spellingShingle |
Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel Data Marques, Humberto Open Innovation Innovation Cooperation PINTEC 2014 Panel Data Analysis Inovação Aberta Inovação Cooperação PINTEC Dados em Painel |
title_short |
Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel Data |
title_full |
Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel Data |
title_fullStr |
Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel Data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel Data |
title_sort |
Open Innovation and Implementation of Different Types of Innovation: An Analysis Based on Panel Data |
author |
Marques, Humberto |
author_facet |
Marques, Humberto Ávila, Ednilson Pereira, Rafael Zambalde, André |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ávila, Ednilson Pereira, Rafael Zambalde, André |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Humberto Ávila, Ednilson Pereira, Rafael Zambalde, André |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Open Innovation Innovation Cooperation PINTEC 2014 Panel Data Analysis Inovação Aberta Inovação Cooperação PINTEC Dados em Painel |
topic |
Open Innovation Innovation Cooperation PINTEC 2014 Panel Data Analysis Inovação Aberta Inovação Cooperação PINTEC Dados em Painel |
description |
This work aimed to verify, based on the open innovation strategy, how different types of interactions with external actors (customers, competitors, suppliers, universities, and consultants) influence different types of innovations (general innovations, product innovations, and technological innovations) implemented by organizations. The panel data technique was used for analysis, based on PINTEC data, an innovation survey conducted by IBGE, which referred to the years 2003, 2005, 2008, 2011, and 2014. Regarding the innovations implemented by organizations, no type of interaction was significant for the general innovations or interactions with consultants, and suppliers were negative for product innovation. Finally, interaction with customers was positive while interaction with universities was negative for technological innovations. Thus, the results were essential to proving that different forms of cooperation have different impacts on the implementation of different types of innovation by organizations. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Artigo revisado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/686 10.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.3 |
url |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/686 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.3 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/686/1036 http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/686/1037 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Business Review http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Business Review http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022): January to February 2022; 39-58 Brazilian Business Review; v. 19 n. 1 (2022): Janeiro a Fevereiro de 2022; 39-58 1808-2386 1807-734X reponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) instname:Fucape Business School (FBS) instacron:FBS |
instname_str |
Fucape Business School (FBS) |
instacron_str |
FBS |
institution |
FBS |
reponame_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
collection |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br |
_version_ |
1754732239743090688 |