Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analyses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramacciotti, Barbara Maria Lucchesi
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bernardino, Marjorie da Cruz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6645
Resumo: This article aims to demonstrate the relevance of the epistemological debate to understand the theoretical bases, the strands and the types of analysis methodology that target the field of public policies. This is a theoretical-explanatory research, based on a literature review of classical authors, such as Putnam, Arretche, Farah, Secchi and Howlett. The study demonstrates that the epistemological distinction between fact and value is an important key to understand on the one hand, the difference between the theoretical-descriptive analysis and the applied-prescriptive analysis of public policies, and on the other, the controversy between the positivist and post positivist strands, which marked the argumentative turn starting in 1990. It was concluded that the understanding of the epistemological issues is of great relevance to the rationale behind the analysis methodologies.
id FCC-1_05150a4c36cc99d9d3416585613cf179
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/6645
network_acronym_str FCC-1
network_name_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analysesVertientes epistemológicas de las políticas públicas: entre los análisis descriptivo y prescriptivoCourants épistémologiques des politiques publiques: entre les analyses descriptives et prescriptivesVertentes epistemológicas das políticas públicas: entre as análises descritiva e prescritivaEpistemologiaPolíticas PúblicasPositivismoEpistemologyPublic PoliciesPositivismEpistemologíaPolíticas PúblicasPositivismÉpistemologiePolitiques PubliquesPositivismeThis article aims to demonstrate the relevance of the epistemological debate to understand the theoretical bases, the strands and the types of analysis methodology that target the field of public policies. This is a theoretical-explanatory research, based on a literature review of classical authors, such as Putnam, Arretche, Farah, Secchi and Howlett. The study demonstrates that the epistemological distinction between fact and value is an important key to understand on the one hand, the difference between the theoretical-descriptive analysis and the applied-prescriptive analysis of public policies, and on the other, the controversy between the positivist and post positivist strands, which marked the argumentative turn starting in 1990. It was concluded that the understanding of the epistemological issues is of great relevance to the rationale behind the analysis methodologies.Este artículo es una investigación que tiene como objetivo demostrar la relevancia del debate epistemológico para comprender las bases teóricas, las vertientes y tipos de metodología de análisis que guían el campo de las Políticas Públicas, basándose para ello en la revisión de la literatura de autores clásicos, como Putnam, Arretche, Farah, Secchi y Howlett. Se demuestra que la distinción entre hecho y valor es importante para comprender la diferencia entre el análisis teórico-descriptivo y el análisis aplicado-prescriptivo de políticas públicas. Del mismo modo es significativa la controversia entre las vertientes positivistas y pospositivistas que marcó un punto de inflexión a partir de 1990. Se concluye que la comprensión de las cuestiones epistemológicas es de gran relevancia para fundamentar las metodologías de análisis.L’objectif de cet article est de demontrer l’importance du débat épistémologique pour comprendre quelles sont les bases théoriques, les différents courants et les types de méthodologie d’analyse qui servent de répère au domaine des politiques publiques. Après avoir passé en revue les travaux classiques sur le sujet des auteurs tels que Putnam, Arretche, Farah, Secchi et Howlett, ce travail démontre que la distinction entre fait et valeur est importante pour comprendre non seulement la différence entre l’analyse théorique descriptive et l’analyse appliquée prescriptive des politiques publiques, mais aussi la controverse entre les courants positivistes et post-positivistes à l’origine du tournant argumentatif initié en 1990. La conclusion montre que la compréhension des questions épistémologiques est d’une grande pertinence pour étayer les méthodologies d’analyse.Este artigo é uma pesquisa que visa a demonstrar a relevância do debate epistemológico para compreender as bases teóricas, vertentes e tipos de metodologia de análise que balizam o campo das políticas públicas, com base em revisão de literatura de autores clássicos como Putnam, Arretche, Farah, Secchi e Howlett. O estudo demonstra que a distinção entre fato e valor é importante para compreender a diferença entre a análise teórico-descritiva e a análise aplicada-prescritiva de políticas públicas, assim como a polêmica entre as vertentes positivistas e pós-positivistas que marcou a virada argumentativa a partir de 1990. Conclui-se que a compreensão das questões epistemológicas é de grande relevância para fundamentar metodologias de análise.Fundação Carlos Chagas2019-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6645Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 50 No. 175: jan./mar.2020; 56-76Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 50 Núm. 175: jan./mar.2020; 56-76Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 50 No. 175: jan./mar.2020; 56-76Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 50 n. 175: jan./mar.2020; 56-761980-53140100-1574reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)instacron:FCCporhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6645/pdfCopyright (c) 2020 Cadernos de Pesquisahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamacciotti, Barbara Maria LucchesiBernardino, Marjorie da Cruz2022-09-20T15:46:20Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/6645Revistahttp://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/cp/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br1980-53140100-1574opendoar:2022-09-20T15:46:20Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analyses
Vertientes epistemológicas de las políticas públicas: entre los análisis descriptivo y prescriptivo
Courants épistémologiques des politiques publiques: entre les analyses descriptives et prescriptives
Vertentes epistemológicas das políticas públicas: entre as análises descritiva e prescritiva
title Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analyses
spellingShingle Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analyses
Ramacciotti, Barbara Maria Lucchesi
Epistemologia
Políticas Públicas
Positivismo
Epistemology
Public Policies
Positivism
Epistemología
Políticas Públicas
Positivism
Épistemologie
Politiques Publiques
Positivisme
title_short Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analyses
title_full Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analyses
title_fullStr Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analyses
title_full_unstemmed Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analyses
title_sort Epistemological strands of public policies: between descriptive and prescriptive analyses
author Ramacciotti, Barbara Maria Lucchesi
author_facet Ramacciotti, Barbara Maria Lucchesi
Bernardino, Marjorie da Cruz
author_role author
author2 Bernardino, Marjorie da Cruz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramacciotti, Barbara Maria Lucchesi
Bernardino, Marjorie da Cruz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Epistemologia
Políticas Públicas
Positivismo
Epistemology
Public Policies
Positivism
Epistemología
Políticas Públicas
Positivism
Épistemologie
Politiques Publiques
Positivisme
topic Epistemologia
Políticas Públicas
Positivismo
Epistemology
Public Policies
Positivism
Epistemología
Políticas Públicas
Positivism
Épistemologie
Politiques Publiques
Positivisme
description This article aims to demonstrate the relevance of the epistemological debate to understand the theoretical bases, the strands and the types of analysis methodology that target the field of public policies. This is a theoretical-explanatory research, based on a literature review of classical authors, such as Putnam, Arretche, Farah, Secchi and Howlett. The study demonstrates that the epistemological distinction between fact and value is an important key to understand on the one hand, the difference between the theoretical-descriptive analysis and the applied-prescriptive analysis of public policies, and on the other, the controversy between the positivist and post positivist strands, which marked the argumentative turn starting in 1990. It was concluded that the understanding of the epistemological issues is of great relevance to the rationale behind the analysis methodologies.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6645
url https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6645
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6645/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 50 No. 175: jan./mar.2020; 56-76
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 50 Núm. 175: jan./mar.2020; 56-76
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 50 No. 175: jan./mar.2020; 56-76
Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 50 n. 175: jan./mar.2020; 56-76
1980-5314
0100-1574
reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron:FCC
instname_str Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron_str FCC
institution FCC
reponame_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
collection Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br
_version_ 1795330316551847936

Registros relacionados