Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Real, Giselle Cristina Martins
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Moreira, Ana Carolina Santana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3524
Resumo: This article analyzes legal decisions for entry into higher education, seeking to identify the majoritarian understanding of the courts of justice in Mato Grosso do Sul and Rio de Janeiro regarding demands based on the scores obtained by candidates in the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio [National High School] – Enem. These state courts were chosen because they deal with most decisions on the subject. This research is both quantitative and qualitative. There was broad legal concession, with the use of arguments that contradict the rules on age limits for granting certification, as well as a disregard for the democratizing objectives of the act which is part of the policies of access to higher education for young people and adults. It is inferred that the courts have promoted an indirect way to access higher education.
id FCC-1_067cee9e5338d36717ea76fcf6b25ecb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/3524
network_acronym_str FCC-1
network_name_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justiceAcceso oblicuo a la educación superior: decisiones de tribunales de justicia estadualesL’acc ès à l’enseignement supérieur: les décisions des tribunaux de justice des étatsAcesso oblíquo à educação superior: decisões de tribunais de justiça estaduaisPolíticas EducacionaisTribunal de JustiçaAcesso ao Ensino SuperiorEnemeducaçãoPolitiques d’éducationCour de Jus ticeAccès à l’education supérieurEnemPolíticas de EducaciónTribunal de JusticiaAcceso a la Educación SuperiorEnemEducational policiesCourt of JusticeAccess to Higher EducationEnemThis article analyzes legal decisions for entry into higher education, seeking to identify the majoritarian understanding of the courts of justice in Mato Grosso do Sul and Rio de Janeiro regarding demands based on the scores obtained by candidates in the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio [National High School] – Enem. These state courts were chosen because they deal with most decisions on the subject. This research is both quantitative and qualitative. There was broad legal concession, with the use of arguments that contradict the rules on age limits for granting certification, as well as a disregard for the democratizing objectives of the act which is part of the policies of access to higher education for young people and adults. It is inferred that the courts have promoted an indirect way to access higher education.Se analizan decisiones judiciales relativas al ingreso en la educación superior, buscando identificar el entendimiento mayoritario de los Tribunales de Mato Grosso do Sul y Rio de Janeiro sobre demandas en base a la nota obtenida en el Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio – Enem. Se justifica la opción por estos tribunales porque ellos concentran la mayor parte de las decisiones sobre la temática. Se trata de una investigación cuanti-cualitativa. Se observó una amplia concesión judicial, con el uso de argumentos que contrarían las normas de limitación de edad para la concesión de la certificación, así como desconsideran los objetivos democratizantes de tal acción integrante de las políticas de acceso a la educación superior para jóvenes y adultos. Se infiere que los tribunales promovieron un acceso oblicuo a la educación superior.Les conditions judiciaires qui ont pour objet l’admission dans l’enseignement supérieur sont analysées , en cherchant à identifier l’entendement majoritaire de tribunaux des états de Mato Grosso do Sul et de Rio de Janeiro à propos des demandes ayant pour la base le notes obtenues par le Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio [Examen National de l’Enseignement Moyen] – ENEM. L’option de ces tribunaux est justifiée par la concentration de la plupart des décisions à ce sujet. Il s’agit d’une recherche quali-quantitative. Une concession judiciaire étendue est observée , avec l’usage d’arguments qui vont à l’encontre des normes de limitation d’âge pour la concession de la certification, et qui ne prennent pas en compte les objectifs démocratiques de cette action intégrante des politiques d’accès à l’enseignement supérieur pour les jeunes et les adultes. On infère que les tribunaux ont promu un accès oblique à l’enseignement supérieur.Analisam-se decisões judiciais que versaram sobre ingresso na educação superior, buscando identificar o entendimento majoritário dos Tribunais de Mato Grosso do Sul e do Rio de Janeiro a respeito de demandas com base na nota obtida pelo Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio – Enem. Justifica-se a opção por esses tribunais por concentrarem a maior parte das decisões sobre a temática. Trata-se de pesquisa quanti-qualitativa. Observou-se ampla concessão judicial, com o uso de argumentos que contrariam as normas de limitação de idade para a concessão da certificação, assim como desconsideram os objetivos democratizantes dessa ação integrante das políticas de acesso à educação superior para jovens e adultos. Infere-se que os tribunais promoveram um acesso oblíquo à educação superior.Fundação Carlos Chagas2016-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3524Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 46 No. 161: jul./set.2016; 822-844Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 46 Núm. 161: jul./set.2016; 822-844Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 46 No. 161: jul./set.2016; 822-844Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 46 n. 161: jul./set.2016; 822-8441980-53140100-1574reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)instacron:FCCporhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3524/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Cadernos de Pesquisahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReal, Giselle Cristina MartinsMoreira, Ana Carolina Santana2022-12-08T12:30:59Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/3524Revistahttp://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/cp/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br1980-53140100-1574opendoar:2022-12-08T12:30:59Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justice
Acceso oblicuo a la educación superior: decisiones de tribunales de justicia estaduales
L’acc ès à l’enseignement supérieur: les décisions des tribunaux de justice des états
Acesso oblíquo à educação superior: decisões de tribunais de justiça estaduais
title Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justice
spellingShingle Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justice
Real, Giselle Cristina Martins
Políticas Educacionais
Tribunal de Justiça
Acesso ao Ensino Superior
Enem
educação
Politiques d’éducation
Cour de Jus tice
Accès à l’education supérieur
Enem
Políticas de Educación
Tribunal de Justicia
Acceso a la Educación Superior
Enem
Educational policies
Court of Justice
Access to Higher Education
Enem
title_short Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justice
title_full Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justice
title_fullStr Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justice
title_full_unstemmed Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justice
title_sort Indirect access to higher education: decisions of state courts of justice
author Real, Giselle Cristina Martins
author_facet Real, Giselle Cristina Martins
Moreira, Ana Carolina Santana
author_role author
author2 Moreira, Ana Carolina Santana
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Real, Giselle Cristina Martins
Moreira, Ana Carolina Santana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Políticas Educacionais
Tribunal de Justiça
Acesso ao Ensino Superior
Enem
educação
Politiques d’éducation
Cour de Jus tice
Accès à l’education supérieur
Enem
Políticas de Educación
Tribunal de Justicia
Acceso a la Educación Superior
Enem
Educational policies
Court of Justice
Access to Higher Education
Enem
topic Políticas Educacionais
Tribunal de Justiça
Acesso ao Ensino Superior
Enem
educação
Politiques d’éducation
Cour de Jus tice
Accès à l’education supérieur
Enem
Políticas de Educación
Tribunal de Justicia
Acceso a la Educación Superior
Enem
Educational policies
Court of Justice
Access to Higher Education
Enem
description This article analyzes legal decisions for entry into higher education, seeking to identify the majoritarian understanding of the courts of justice in Mato Grosso do Sul and Rio de Janeiro regarding demands based on the scores obtained by candidates in the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio [National High School] – Enem. These state courts were chosen because they deal with most decisions on the subject. This research is both quantitative and qualitative. There was broad legal concession, with the use of arguments that contradict the rules on age limits for granting certification, as well as a disregard for the democratizing objectives of the act which is part of the policies of access to higher education for young people and adults. It is inferred that the courts have promoted an indirect way to access higher education.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3524
url https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3524
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3524/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 46 No. 161: jul./set.2016; 822-844
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 46 Núm. 161: jul./set.2016; 822-844
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 46 No. 161: jul./set.2016; 822-844
Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 46 n. 161: jul./set.2016; 822-844
1980-5314
0100-1574
reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron:FCC
instname_str Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron_str FCC
institution FCC
reponame_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
collection Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br
_version_ 1795330315316625408