Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: González Ramos, Ana M.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Revelles Benavente, Beatriz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/4233
Resumo: Excellence in science is defined as a neutral process for the selection and recognition of worthy theories and researchers. This principle is based on the metricization of academic life through employing universal criteria that support fair play and equal opportunities. However, feminist theories have claimed that the organization of science based on excellence is never neutral or objective. Meritocracy reproduces inequality from social structures, particularly those related to gender stereotypes and barriers in researchers’ career evaluation, as well as research outcomes. In this paper, we propose that excellent knowledge is produced only through gender and science in the making.
id FCC-1_24efc3b3846345d01ee62823bf5136a7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/4233
network_acronym_str FCC-1
network_name_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Excellence in science: a critical affirmative responseExcelencia en la ciencia: uma reflexión crítica afirmativaL’excellence en sciences: une réflexion critique et affirmativeExcelência na ciência: uma reflexão crítica afirmativaDesenvolvimento ProfissionalMeritocraciaMulheresInterdisciplinaridadeDéveloppement ProfessionnelMéritocratieFemmesInterdisciplinaritéDesarrollo ProfessionalMeritocraciaMujeresInterdisciplinariedadDéveloppement ProfessionnelMéritocratieFemmesInterdisciplinaritéExcellence in science is defined as a neutral process for the selection and recognition of worthy theories and researchers. This principle is based on the metricization of academic life through employing universal criteria that support fair play and equal opportunities. However, feminist theories have claimed that the organization of science based on excellence is never neutral or objective. Meritocracy reproduces inequality from social structures, particularly those related to gender stereotypes and barriers in researchers’ career evaluation, as well as research outcomes. In this paper, we propose that excellent knowledge is produced only through gender and science in the making.La excelencia en la ciencia es definida como un proceso neutro para la selección y el reconocimiento de las teorías e investigaciones más valiosas. Este principio está basado en la metrización de la vida académica a través del empleo de criterios universales que apoyan el juego justo y la igualdad de oportunidades. Sin embargo, las teorías feministas han reclamado que la organización de la ciencia basada en la excelencia nunca es neutral ni objetiva. La meritocracia reproduce las desigualdades de todas las estructuras sociales, particularmente aquellas relacionadas con los estereotipos de género y las barreras en la evaluación de las carreras de investigación y los resultados de investigación. En este artículo, proponemos que la excelencia en el conocimiento es producido sólo cuándo el género y la ciencia se crean procesualmente.L’excellence en sciences se définit comme un processus neutre visant la sélection et la reconnaissance des théories et des recherches les plus importantes. Ce principe se base sur la mesure des résultats de la vie académique, à travers l’usage de critères universels soutenant le franc-jeu [le fair play] et l’égalité des chances. Cependant, les théories féministes ont objecté qu’une organisation basée sur l’excellence n’est jamais ni neutre, ni objective. La méritocratie reproduit les inégalités presentes dans toutes les structures sociales, particulièrement celles liées aux stéréotypes de genre, mais aussi aux barrières à l’évaluation des carrières dans la recherche et aux résultats de recherches. Cet article avance que l’excellence du savoir ne se produit que quand le genre et la science sont créés de manière procédurale.A excelência na ciência é definida como um processo neutro para a seleção e o reconhecimento das teorias e pesquisas mais valiosas. Este princípio está baseado na metrização da vida acadêmica através do uso de critérios universais que apoiam o jogo justo [fair play] e a igualdade de oportunidades. No entanto, as teorias feministas têm reclamado que a organização da ciência baseada na excelência nunca é neutra nem objetiva. A meritocracia reproduz as desigualdades de todas as estruturas sociais, particularmente daquelas relacionadas com os estereótipos de gênero e com as barreiras na avaliação de carreiras de pesquisa e nos resultados da pesquisa. Neste artigo, propomos que a excelência no conhecimento só ocorre quando o gênero e a ciência são criados processualmente.Fundação Carlos Chagas2017-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/4233Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 47 No. 166: out./dez.2017; 1372-1394Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 47 Núm. 166: out./dez.2017; 1372-1394Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 47 No. 166: out./dez.2017; 1372-1394Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 47 n. 166: out./dez.2017; 1372-13941980-53140100-1574reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)instacron:FCCspaenghttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/4233/pdfhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/4233/3456Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos de Pesquisahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonzález Ramos, Ana M.Revelles Benavente, Beatriz2022-12-02T14:08:35Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/4233Revistahttp://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/cp/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br1980-53140100-1574opendoar:2022-12-02T14:08:35Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response
Excelencia en la ciencia: uma reflexión crítica afirmativa
L’excellence en sciences: une réflexion critique et affirmative
Excelência na ciência: uma reflexão crítica afirmativa
title Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response
spellingShingle Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response
González Ramos, Ana M.
Desenvolvimento Profissional
Meritocracia
Mulheres
Interdisciplinaridade
Développement Professionnel
Méritocratie
Femmes
Interdisciplinarité
Desarrollo Professional
Meritocracia
Mujeres
Interdisciplinariedad
Développement Professionnel
Méritocratie
Femmes
Interdisciplinarité
title_short Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response
title_full Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response
title_fullStr Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response
title_full_unstemmed Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response
title_sort Excellence in science: a critical affirmative response
author González Ramos, Ana M.
author_facet González Ramos, Ana M.
Revelles Benavente, Beatriz
author_role author
author2 Revelles Benavente, Beatriz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv González Ramos, Ana M.
Revelles Benavente, Beatriz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Desenvolvimento Profissional
Meritocracia
Mulheres
Interdisciplinaridade
Développement Professionnel
Méritocratie
Femmes
Interdisciplinarité
Desarrollo Professional
Meritocracia
Mujeres
Interdisciplinariedad
Développement Professionnel
Méritocratie
Femmes
Interdisciplinarité
topic Desenvolvimento Profissional
Meritocracia
Mulheres
Interdisciplinaridade
Développement Professionnel
Méritocratie
Femmes
Interdisciplinarité
Desarrollo Professional
Meritocracia
Mujeres
Interdisciplinariedad
Développement Professionnel
Méritocratie
Femmes
Interdisciplinarité
description Excellence in science is defined as a neutral process for the selection and recognition of worthy theories and researchers. This principle is based on the metricization of academic life through employing universal criteria that support fair play and equal opportunities. However, feminist theories have claimed that the organization of science based on excellence is never neutral or objective. Meritocracy reproduces inequality from social structures, particularly those related to gender stereotypes and barriers in researchers’ career evaluation, as well as research outcomes. In this paper, we propose that excellent knowledge is produced only through gender and science in the making.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/4233
url https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/4233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/4233/pdf
https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/4233/3456
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 47 No. 166: out./dez.2017; 1372-1394
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 47 Núm. 166: out./dez.2017; 1372-1394
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 47 No. 166: out./dez.2017; 1372-1394
Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 47 n. 166: out./dez.2017; 1372-1394
1980-5314
0100-1574
reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron:FCC
instname_str Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron_str FCC
institution FCC
reponame_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
collection Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br
_version_ 1795330315814699008

Registros relacionados