Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational research

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Marcos Villela
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Damiani, Magda Floriana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3332
Resumo: The purpose of this essay is to discuss some consequences of productivism, which the academic community has been going through, in recent years. More specifically, we will consider and reflect on two episodes of evaluation of scientific work in the field of education. After outlining a brief introduction, we proceed to the analysis, pointing out ideas and dilemmas worth debating. We conclude by considering the openness to the other as an exercise in which we experience our own decision making symmetrically to the other´s decision making, as a practice of negotiation. The plurality of ideas is a fundamental presupposition and we consider evaluator and reader as an agonistic pair that is guided by plausible arguments: both need to recognize the legitimacy of their own positions, therefore, it is not a matter of mutual annihilation, but of the recognition that they each perceive the other not as an adversary but as a legitimate and reasonable peer.
id FCC-1_6a4cd1f787139e9025fcbd44415816bd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/3332
network_acronym_str FCC-1
network_name_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational researchDificultades de los evaluadores: en búsqueda de calidad en la investigación en educaciónAgruras dos avaliadores: em busca de qualidade na pesquisa em educaçãoProdução Técnico-CientíficaAnálise CríticaPesquisa EducacionalAgonismoProdutivismo acadêmicoTechnical Scientific ProductionCritical AnalysisEducational ResearchAgonismProducción Técnico-CientíficaAnálisis CríticaInvestigación EducativaAgonismoThe purpose of this essay is to discuss some consequences of productivism, which the academic community has been going through, in recent years. More specifically, we will consider and reflect on two episodes of evaluation of scientific work in the field of education. After outlining a brief introduction, we proceed to the analysis, pointing out ideas and dilemmas worth debating. We conclude by considering the openness to the other as an exercise in which we experience our own decision making symmetrically to the other´s decision making, as a practice of negotiation. The plurality of ideas is a fundamental presupposition and we consider evaluator and reader as an agonistic pair that is guided by plausible arguments: both need to recognize the legitimacy of their own positions, therefore, it is not a matter of mutual annihilation, but of the recognition that they each perceive the other not as an adversary but as a legitimate and reasonable peer.El objetivo del ensayo es pautar algunas consecuencias del productivismo a que la comunidad académica ha sido forzada durante los últimos años. En particular, elaboraremos consideraciones y ponderaciones en lo que concierne a dos episodios de evaluación de trabajos científicos en el campo de la educación. Luego de delinear un breve preámbulo, procedemos al análisis, señalando ideas y dilemas pasibles de debate. Concluimos ponderando la apertura al otro como ejercicio en el que experimentamos nuestra propia toma de posición simétricamente a la toma de posición del otro, como práctica de negociación. La pluralidad de ideas es un supuesto fundamental y consideramos evaluador y lector un par agónico que se pauta por argumentos plausibles: ambos necesitan reconocerse en la legitimidad de sus posiciones y por ello no se trata de avanzar rumbo al aniquilamiento mutuo, sino de reconocer que cada uno constituye al otro no como adversario, sino como par, legítimo e razonables. O objetivo do ensaio é pautar algumas consequências do produtivismo a que a comunidade acadêmica tem sido compelida, nos últimos anos. Mais particularmente, vamos tecer considerações e fazer ponderações em torno de dois episódios de avaliação de trabalhos científicos no campo da educação. Após delinear breve preâmbulo, procedemos a análise, pontuando ideias e dilemas passíveis de debate. Concluímos ponderando a abertura ao outro como exercício em que experimentamos a nossa própria tomada de posição simetricamente à tomada de posição do outro, como prática de negociação. A pluralidade de ideias é pressuposto fundamental e consideramos avaliador e leitor um par agônico que se pauta por argumentos plausíveis: ambos precisam se reconhecer na legitimidade das suas posições e, por isso, não se trata de avançar na direção do aniquilamento mútuo, mas do reconhecimento de que cada um constitui o outro não como adversário, mas como par, legítimo e razoável.   Fundação Carlos Chagas2015-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3332Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 No. 158: out./dez.2015; 818-837Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 Núm. 158: out./dez.2015; 818-837Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 No. 158: out./dez.2015; 818-837Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 45 n. 158: out./dez.2015; 818-8371980-53140100-1574reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)instacron:FCCporhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3332/pdf.6Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos de Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Marcos VillelaDamiani, Magda Floriana2015-12-14T17:28:57Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/3332Revistahttp://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/cp/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br1980-53140100-1574opendoar:2015-12-14T17:28:57Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational research
Dificultades de los evaluadores: en búsqueda de calidad en la investigación en educación
Agruras dos avaliadores: em busca de qualidade na pesquisa em educação
title Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational research
spellingShingle Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational research
Pereira, Marcos Villela
Produção Técnico-Científica
Análise Crítica
Pesquisa Educacional
Agonismo
Produtivismo acadêmico
Technical Scientific Production
Critical Analysis
Educational Research
Agonism
Producción Técnico-Científica
Análisis Crítica
Investigación Educativa
Agonismo
title_short Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational research
title_full Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational research
title_fullStr Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational research
title_full_unstemmed Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational research
title_sort Difficulties of evaluators: searching for quality in educational research
author Pereira, Marcos Villela
author_facet Pereira, Marcos Villela
Damiani, Magda Floriana
author_role author
author2 Damiani, Magda Floriana
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Marcos Villela
Damiani, Magda Floriana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Produção Técnico-Científica
Análise Crítica
Pesquisa Educacional
Agonismo
Produtivismo acadêmico
Technical Scientific Production
Critical Analysis
Educational Research
Agonism
Producción Técnico-Científica
Análisis Crítica
Investigación Educativa
Agonismo
topic Produção Técnico-Científica
Análise Crítica
Pesquisa Educacional
Agonismo
Produtivismo acadêmico
Technical Scientific Production
Critical Analysis
Educational Research
Agonism
Producción Técnico-Científica
Análisis Crítica
Investigación Educativa
Agonismo
description The purpose of this essay is to discuss some consequences of productivism, which the academic community has been going through, in recent years. More specifically, we will consider and reflect on two episodes of evaluation of scientific work in the field of education. After outlining a brief introduction, we proceed to the analysis, pointing out ideas and dilemmas worth debating. We conclude by considering the openness to the other as an exercise in which we experience our own decision making symmetrically to the other´s decision making, as a practice of negotiation. The plurality of ideas is a fundamental presupposition and we consider evaluator and reader as an agonistic pair that is guided by plausible arguments: both need to recognize the legitimacy of their own positions, therefore, it is not a matter of mutual annihilation, but of the recognition that they each perceive the other not as an adversary but as a legitimate and reasonable peer.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3332
url https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3332
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/3332/pdf.6
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos de Pesquisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos de Pesquisa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 No. 158: out./dez.2015; 818-837
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 Núm. 158: out./dez.2015; 818-837
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 No. 158: out./dez.2015; 818-837
Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 45 n. 158: out./dez.2015; 818-837
1980-5314
0100-1574
reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron:FCC
instname_str Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron_str FCC
institution FCC
reponame_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
collection Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br
_version_ 1795330315260002304

Registros relacionados