Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of Prouni

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreira, Claudia Regina Baukat Silveira
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: de Souza, Ângelo Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Estudos em Avaliação Educacional
Texto Completo: https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/5713
Resumo: Based on the fact that the majority of vacancies in higher education is mainly in private schools in Brazil, this study aims to identify the profiles of the beneficiaries of the program University for All (ProUni). It considers three courses: Pedagogy, Medicine and Law. The research resource used was the evaluation of policies established in the field of public policies. The microdata collected, using the socio-educational questionnaire during the application of Enade between 2008 and 2013, were analyzed. These data allow us to conclude that ProUni has been successful in terms of its established goals of ensuring the access of poor young people coming from public schools, to higher education. However, the data also allow us to affirm that the program is limited in scope, since the differences identified among the benefitted students in the different courses suggest that there is a reiteration of the educational inequalities. 
id FCC-2_8aedd5b8f461c8d6eabaa89042bd6287
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/5713
network_acronym_str FCC-2
network_name_str Estudos em Avaliação Educacional
repository_id_str
spelling Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of ProuniDemocratización del acceso a la educación superior en debate: evaluación de ProuniDemocratização do acesso à educação superior em debate: avaliação do ProuniEducational PoliciesProgram EvaluationProuniEducational InequalitiesPolíticas EducacionalesEvaluación de ProgramasProuniDesigualdades EducativasPolíticas EducacionaisAvaliação de ProgramasProuniDesigualdades EducacionaisBased on the fact that the majority of vacancies in higher education is mainly in private schools in Brazil, this study aims to identify the profiles of the beneficiaries of the program University for All (ProUni). It considers three courses: Pedagogy, Medicine and Law. The research resource used was the evaluation of policies established in the field of public policies. The microdata collected, using the socio-educational questionnaire during the application of Enade between 2008 and 2013, were analyzed. These data allow us to conclude that ProUni has been successful in terms of its established goals of ensuring the access of poor young people coming from public schools, to higher education. However, the data also allow us to affirm that the program is limited in scope, since the differences identified among the benefitted students in the different courses suggest that there is a reiteration of the educational inequalities. Partiendo de la constatación de que la oferta de plazas en la educación superior es sobre todo privada, este trabajo pretende identificar los perfiles de los becarios beneficiados por el Programa Universidad para Todos (ProUni), considerando tres cursos: Pedagogía, Medicina y Derecho. Para ello, se utilizó el recurso de la evaluación de políticas, tal como formulado en el campo de políticas públicas. Se analizaron los microdatos del cuestionario socioeducativo aplicado durante la realización del Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes (Enade), en el periodo abarcado entre 2008 y 2013. Los datos permiten concluir que ProUni es exitoso en lo que concierne a las metas establecidas, asegurando la inserción de jóvenes pobres provenientes por encima de todo de la escuela pública. Sin embargo, los datos también permiten afirmar que el programa es limitado en lo que se refiere a su alcance, ya que las diferencias identificadas entre los becarios de los tres cursos analizados sugieren que hay una reproducción de las desigualdades educacionales. Partindo da constatação de que a oferta de vagas na educação superior é sobre tudo privada, este trabalho pretende identificar os perfis dos bolsistas beneficiados pelo Programa Universidade para Todos (ProUni), considerando três cursos: Pedagogia, Medicina e Direito. Para tanto, o recurso foi o da avaliação de políticas, tal como formulado no campo de políticas públicas. Foram analisados os microdados do questionário socioeducacional aplicado por ocasião da realização do Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes (Enade), no período entre 2008 e 2013. Os dados permitem concluir que o ProUni é bem-sucedido quanto às metas estabelecidas, garantindo a inserção de jovens pobres, oriundos principalmente da escola pública. Contudo, os dados também possibilitam afirmar que o programa é limitado quanto ao seu escopo, pois as diferenças identificadas entre os bolsistas dos três cursos analisados sugerem que há uma reprodução das desigualdades educacionais.Fundação Carlos Chagas2019-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/571310.18222/eae.v30i73.5713Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; Vol. 30 No. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-223Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; Vol. 30 Núm. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-223Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; Vol. 30 No. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-223Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; V. 30 N. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-223Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; v. 30 n. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-2231984-932X0103-6831reponame:Estudos em Avaliação Educacionalinstname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)instacron:FCCporhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/5713/3751Copyright (c) 2019 Estudos em Avaliação Educacionalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira, Claudia Regina Baukat Silveirade Souza, Ângelo Ricardo2024-01-19T17:35:24Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/5713Revistahttp://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/eae/indexONGhttp://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/eae/oaieae@fcc.org.br||ngimenes@fcc.org.br1984-932X0103-6831opendoar:2024-01-19T17:35:24Estudos em Avaliação Educacional - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of Prouni
Democratización del acceso a la educación superior en debate: evaluación de Prouni
Democratização do acesso à educação superior em debate: avaliação do Prouni
title Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of Prouni
spellingShingle Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of Prouni
Moreira, Claudia Regina Baukat Silveira
Educational Policies
Program Evaluation
Prouni
Educational Inequalities
Políticas Educacionales
Evaluación de Programas
Prouni
Desigualdades Educativas
Políticas Educacionais
Avaliação de Programas
Prouni
Desigualdades Educacionais
title_short Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of Prouni
title_full Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of Prouni
title_fullStr Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of Prouni
title_full_unstemmed Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of Prouni
title_sort Debateon the democratization of access to higher education: evaluation of Prouni
author Moreira, Claudia Regina Baukat Silveira
author_facet Moreira, Claudia Regina Baukat Silveira
de Souza, Ângelo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 de Souza, Ângelo Ricardo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreira, Claudia Regina Baukat Silveira
de Souza, Ângelo Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Educational Policies
Program Evaluation
Prouni
Educational Inequalities
Políticas Educacionales
Evaluación de Programas
Prouni
Desigualdades Educativas
Políticas Educacionais
Avaliação de Programas
Prouni
Desigualdades Educacionais
topic Educational Policies
Program Evaluation
Prouni
Educational Inequalities
Políticas Educacionales
Evaluación de Programas
Prouni
Desigualdades Educativas
Políticas Educacionais
Avaliação de Programas
Prouni
Desigualdades Educacionais
description Based on the fact that the majority of vacancies in higher education is mainly in private schools in Brazil, this study aims to identify the profiles of the beneficiaries of the program University for All (ProUni). It considers three courses: Pedagogy, Medicine and Law. The research resource used was the evaluation of policies established in the field of public policies. The microdata collected, using the socio-educational questionnaire during the application of Enade between 2008 and 2013, were analyzed. These data allow us to conclude that ProUni has been successful in terms of its established goals of ensuring the access of poor young people coming from public schools, to higher education. However, the data also allow us to affirm that the program is limited in scope, since the differences identified among the benefitted students in the different courses suggest that there is a reiteration of the educational inequalities. 
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/5713
10.18222/eae.v30i73.5713
url https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/5713
identifier_str_mv 10.18222/eae.v30i73.5713
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/eae/article/view/5713/3751
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; Vol. 30 No. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-223
Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; Vol. 30 Núm. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-223
Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; Vol. 30 No. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-223
Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; V. 30 N. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-223
Estudos em Avaliação Educacional; v. 30 n. 73 (2019): jan./abr. 2019; 202-223
1984-932X
0103-6831
reponame:Estudos em Avaliação Educacional
instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron:FCC
instname_str Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron_str FCC
institution FCC
reponame_str Estudos em Avaliação Educacional
collection Estudos em Avaliação Educacional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos em Avaliação Educacional - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv eae@fcc.org.br||ngimenes@fcc.org.br
_version_ 1795332422941802496

Registros relacionados