Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1255 |
Resumo: | To discuss the mistakes and aspects of memory, in order to solve theoretical problems and, therefore, practical problems of the same in the work of the librarian. The methodological procedure adopted is the bibliographic review using the elementary qualities to the field of Social Memory in consonance with its application in a hypothetical case study, justifiable due to the exploratory character and its applicability in several typologies of libraries or information units. Here are some misunderstandings that will be analyzed: The reductionism of the field of Social Memory, the "rescue" of memory, "univocity", "neutrality" and the place of memory as a safeguard. Afterwards, it is necessary to reflect on the fundamental characteristics of memory (procedural construction, duration, polymorphism, intentionality, dichotomy) in the librarian's doing, specifically in the politics of collections development, for a discussion that fosters salutary practices and reduces misconceptions - or even objectifying devices - in the workplace. In addition, the field of Social Memory is interdisciplinary, but with the intention of promoting transdisciplinary discussions, which reinforces the need to think about the librarian's performance beyond the usual tools and practices within his field of training, because if the focus of this professional is the user, so it is necessary to adapt the demands of the social body. It is concluded that the discussion of the conceptual tools of the Social Memory field, applied to the librarian's role, are key elements in the review and strengthening of policies, as well as strengthening the library's mission and vision. In short, memory is action.. |
id |
FEBAB-1_b6462dcec35b0c95146f893bb2d89112 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rbbd.febab.org.br:article/1255 |
network_acronym_str |
FEBAB-1 |
network_name_str |
RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policyEquívocos e efeitos da memória no âmbito de atuação do bibliotecário: reflexões sob o viés da política de desenvolvimento de coleçõesMemory. Mistakes. Development of collections. Objectivization devices. Librarian - managements aspects.Memória. Equívocos. Desenvolvimento de coleções. Dispositivos de objetivação. Bibliotecário – aspectos gerenciais.To discuss the mistakes and aspects of memory, in order to solve theoretical problems and, therefore, practical problems of the same in the work of the librarian. The methodological procedure adopted is the bibliographic review using the elementary qualities to the field of Social Memory in consonance with its application in a hypothetical case study, justifiable due to the exploratory character and its applicability in several typologies of libraries or information units. Here are some misunderstandings that will be analyzed: The reductionism of the field of Social Memory, the "rescue" of memory, "univocity", "neutrality" and the place of memory as a safeguard. Afterwards, it is necessary to reflect on the fundamental characteristics of memory (procedural construction, duration, polymorphism, intentionality, dichotomy) in the librarian's doing, specifically in the politics of collections development, for a discussion that fosters salutary practices and reduces misconceptions - or even objectifying devices - in the workplace. In addition, the field of Social Memory is interdisciplinary, but with the intention of promoting transdisciplinary discussions, which reinforces the need to think about the librarian's performance beyond the usual tools and practices within his field of training, because if the focus of this professional is the user, so it is necessary to adapt the demands of the social body. It is concluded that the discussion of the conceptual tools of the Social Memory field, applied to the librarian's role, are key elements in the review and strengthening of policies, as well as strengthening the library's mission and vision. In short, memory is action..Discutir sobre os equívocos e aspectos da memória, com o intuito de dirimir problemas teóricos e, por conseguinte, práticos da mesma na atuação do bibliotecário. O procedimento metodológico adotado é a revisão bibliográfica utilizando-se das qualidades elementares ao campo da Memória Social em consonância com sua aplicação em um estudo de caso hipotético, justificável devido ao carater exploratório e sua aplicabilidade em diversas tipologias de bibliotecas ou unidades de informação. Eis alguns equívocos que serão analisados: O reducionismo do campo da Memória Social, o “resgate” de memória, a “univocidade”, a “neutralidade” e o lugar de memória como salvaguarda. Após, cabe-nos refletir sobre características fundamentais da memória (construção processual, duração, polimorfia, intencionalidade, dicotomia) no fazer do bibliotecário, especificamente na política de desenvolvimento de coleções, em prol de uma discussão que fomente práticas salutares e diminua equívocos – ou mesmo dispositivos de objetivação – no ambiente de trabalho. Além disso, o campo da Memória Social é interdisciplinar, porém com o intuito de promover discussões transdisciplinares, o que reforça a necessidade de pensarmos a atuação do bibliotecário além das ferramentas e práticas usuais dentro do seu campo de formação, pois se o foco deste profissional é o usuário, logo é mister que se adaptem as demandas do corpo social. Conclui-se que a discussão das ferramentas conceituais do campo da Memória Social, aplicado ao fazer do bibliotecário, são peças-chave no que diz respeito à revisão e fortalecimento de políticas, além de fortalecer a missão e visão da biblioteca. Em suma, a memória é ação.Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Inst.2019-09-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1255Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação; v. 15 n. 3 (2019); 286-3071980-69490100-0691reponame:RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB)instacron:FEBABporhttps://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1255/1159Copyright (c) 2019 Alex Medeiros Kornalewski, Francisco Ramos de Fariashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKornalewski, Alex MedeirosFarias, Francisco Ramos de2019-09-08T23:58:05Zoai:ojs.rbbd.febab.org.br:article/1255Revistahttps://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbdhttps://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/oai||rbbd@rbbd.febab.org.br|| jorge.exlibris@gmail.com1980-69490100-0691opendoar:2019-09-08T23:58:05RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) - Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policy Equívocos e efeitos da memória no âmbito de atuação do bibliotecário: reflexões sob o viés da política de desenvolvimento de coleções |
title |
Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policy |
spellingShingle |
Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policy Kornalewski, Alex Medeiros Memory. Mistakes. Development of collections. Objectivization devices. Librarian - managements aspects. Memória. Equívocos. Desenvolvimento de coleções. Dispositivos de objetivação. Bibliotecário – aspectos gerenciais. |
title_short |
Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policy |
title_full |
Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policy |
title_fullStr |
Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policy |
title_sort |
Mistakes and effects of the memory in the scope of the librarian’s performance: reflections under the bias of collections development policy |
author |
Kornalewski, Alex Medeiros |
author_facet |
Kornalewski, Alex Medeiros Farias, Francisco Ramos de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Farias, Francisco Ramos de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kornalewski, Alex Medeiros Farias, Francisco Ramos de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Memory. Mistakes. Development of collections. Objectivization devices. Librarian - managements aspects. Memória. Equívocos. Desenvolvimento de coleções. Dispositivos de objetivação. Bibliotecário – aspectos gerenciais. |
topic |
Memory. Mistakes. Development of collections. Objectivization devices. Librarian - managements aspects. Memória. Equívocos. Desenvolvimento de coleções. Dispositivos de objetivação. Bibliotecário – aspectos gerenciais. |
description |
To discuss the mistakes and aspects of memory, in order to solve theoretical problems and, therefore, practical problems of the same in the work of the librarian. The methodological procedure adopted is the bibliographic review using the elementary qualities to the field of Social Memory in consonance with its application in a hypothetical case study, justifiable due to the exploratory character and its applicability in several typologies of libraries or information units. Here are some misunderstandings that will be analyzed: The reductionism of the field of Social Memory, the "rescue" of memory, "univocity", "neutrality" and the place of memory as a safeguard. Afterwards, it is necessary to reflect on the fundamental characteristics of memory (procedural construction, duration, polymorphism, intentionality, dichotomy) in the librarian's doing, specifically in the politics of collections development, for a discussion that fosters salutary practices and reduces misconceptions - or even objectifying devices - in the workplace. In addition, the field of Social Memory is interdisciplinary, but with the intention of promoting transdisciplinary discussions, which reinforces the need to think about the librarian's performance beyond the usual tools and practices within his field of training, because if the focus of this professional is the user, so it is necessary to adapt the demands of the social body. It is concluded that the discussion of the conceptual tools of the Social Memory field, applied to the librarian's role, are key elements in the review and strengthening of policies, as well as strengthening the library's mission and vision. In short, memory is action.. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1255 |
url |
https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1255 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1255/1159 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Alex Medeiros Kornalewski, Francisco Ramos de Farias https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Alex Medeiros Kornalewski, Francisco Ramos de Farias https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Inst. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Inst. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação; v. 15 n. 3 (2019); 286-307 1980-6949 0100-0691 reponame:RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) instname:Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB) instacron:FEBAB |
instname_str |
Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB) |
instacron_str |
FEBAB |
institution |
FEBAB |
reponame_str |
RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) |
collection |
RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) - Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbbd@rbbd.febab.org.br|| jorge.exlibris@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798319778851454976 |