Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500306 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective To compare laparoscopy with laparotomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer. Methods A cohort of women with preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging was retrospectively evaluated. The main study end points were: morbidity and mortality, hospital length of stay, perioperative adverse events and recurrence rate. Data analysis was performed with the software SPSS v25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), categorical variables using a Chi-square and Fisher test, and continuous variables using the Student t-test. Results Atotal of 162 patientswere analyzed. 138 patientsmet the inclusion criteria, 41of whom underwent staging by laparoscopy and 97 by laparotomy. Conversions from laparoscopy to laparotomy happened in 2 patients (4.9%) and were secondary to technical difficulties and poor exposure. Laparoscopy had fewer postoperative adverse events when compared with laparotomy (7.3% vs 23.7%, respectively; p = 0.005), but similar rates of intraoperative complications, despite having a significantly longer operative time (median, 175 vs 130 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly lower in laparoscopy versus laparotomy patients (median, 3 vs 7 days, respectively; p < 0.001). No difference in recurrence or mortality rates were observed. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer is feasible and safe. Patients have lower postoperative complication rates and shorter hospital stays when compared with the approach by laparotomy. |
id |
FEBRASGO-1_d67958549c40adbddeea6efae8852c17 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-72032019000500306 |
network_acronym_str |
FEBRASGO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancerendometrial neoplasmslaparoscopyneoplasm staginghysterectomylymph node excisionAbstract Objective To compare laparoscopy with laparotomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer. Methods A cohort of women with preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging was retrospectively evaluated. The main study end points were: morbidity and mortality, hospital length of stay, perioperative adverse events and recurrence rate. Data analysis was performed with the software SPSS v25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), categorical variables using a Chi-square and Fisher test, and continuous variables using the Student t-test. Results Atotal of 162 patientswere analyzed. 138 patientsmet the inclusion criteria, 41of whom underwent staging by laparoscopy and 97 by laparotomy. Conversions from laparoscopy to laparotomy happened in 2 patients (4.9%) and were secondary to technical difficulties and poor exposure. Laparoscopy had fewer postoperative adverse events when compared with laparotomy (7.3% vs 23.7%, respectively; p = 0.005), but similar rates of intraoperative complications, despite having a significantly longer operative time (median, 175 vs 130 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly lower in laparoscopy versus laparotomy patients (median, 3 vs 7 days, respectively; p < 0.001). No difference in recurrence or mortality rates were observed. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer is feasible and safe. Patients have lower postoperative complication rates and shorter hospital stays when compared with the approach by laparotomy.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2019-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500306Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.5 2019reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0039-1688461info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMouraz,MarianaFerreira,Cátia SofiaGonçalves,SóniaMartins,Nuno NogueiraMartins,Francisco Nogueiraeng2019-06-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032019000500306Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2019-06-25T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer |
title |
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer |
spellingShingle |
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer Mouraz,Mariana endometrial neoplasms laparoscopy neoplasm staging hysterectomy lymph node excision |
title_short |
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer |
title_full |
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer |
title_fullStr |
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer |
title_sort |
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer |
author |
Mouraz,Mariana |
author_facet |
Mouraz,Mariana Ferreira,Cátia Sofia Gonçalves,Sónia Martins,Nuno Nogueira Martins,Francisco Nogueira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,Cátia Sofia Gonçalves,Sónia Martins,Nuno Nogueira Martins,Francisco Nogueira |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mouraz,Mariana Ferreira,Cátia Sofia Gonçalves,Sónia Martins,Nuno Nogueira Martins,Francisco Nogueira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
endometrial neoplasms laparoscopy neoplasm staging hysterectomy lymph node excision |
topic |
endometrial neoplasms laparoscopy neoplasm staging hysterectomy lymph node excision |
description |
Abstract Objective To compare laparoscopy with laparotomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer. Methods A cohort of women with preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging was retrospectively evaluated. The main study end points were: morbidity and mortality, hospital length of stay, perioperative adverse events and recurrence rate. Data analysis was performed with the software SPSS v25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), categorical variables using a Chi-square and Fisher test, and continuous variables using the Student t-test. Results Atotal of 162 patientswere analyzed. 138 patientsmet the inclusion criteria, 41of whom underwent staging by laparoscopy and 97 by laparotomy. Conversions from laparoscopy to laparotomy happened in 2 patients (4.9%) and were secondary to technical difficulties and poor exposure. Laparoscopy had fewer postoperative adverse events when compared with laparotomy (7.3% vs 23.7%, respectively; p = 0.005), but similar rates of intraoperative complications, despite having a significantly longer operative time (median, 175 vs 130 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly lower in laparoscopy versus laparotomy patients (median, 3 vs 7 days, respectively; p < 0.001). No difference in recurrence or mortality rates were observed. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer is feasible and safe. Patients have lower postoperative complication rates and shorter hospital stays when compared with the approach by laparotomy. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500306 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500306 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0039-1688461 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.5 2019 reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) instacron:FEBRASGO |
instname_str |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
instacron_str |
FEBRASGO |
institution |
FEBRASGO |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754115944846721024 |