Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mouraz,Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Cátia Sofia, Gonçalves,Sónia, Martins,Nuno Nogueira, Martins,Francisco Nogueira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500306
Resumo: Abstract Objective To compare laparoscopy with laparotomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer. Methods A cohort of women with preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging was retrospectively evaluated. The main study end points were: morbidity and mortality, hospital length of stay, perioperative adverse events and recurrence rate. Data analysis was performed with the software SPSS v25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), categorical variables using a Chi-square and Fisher test, and continuous variables using the Student t-test. Results Atotal of 162 patientswere analyzed. 138 patientsmet the inclusion criteria, 41of whom underwent staging by laparoscopy and 97 by laparotomy. Conversions from laparoscopy to laparotomy happened in 2 patients (4.9%) and were secondary to technical difficulties and poor exposure. Laparoscopy had fewer postoperative adverse events when compared with laparotomy (7.3% vs 23.7%, respectively; p = 0.005), but similar rates of intraoperative complications, despite having a significantly longer operative time (median, 175 vs 130 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly lower in laparoscopy versus laparotomy patients (median, 3 vs 7 days, respectively; p < 0.001). No difference in recurrence or mortality rates were observed. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer is feasible and safe. Patients have lower postoperative complication rates and shorter hospital stays when compared with the approach by laparotomy.
id FEBRASGO-1_d67958549c40adbddeea6efae8852c17
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-72032019000500306
network_acronym_str FEBRASGO-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancerendometrial neoplasmslaparoscopyneoplasm staginghysterectomylymph node excisionAbstract Objective To compare laparoscopy with laparotomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer. Methods A cohort of women with preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging was retrospectively evaluated. The main study end points were: morbidity and mortality, hospital length of stay, perioperative adverse events and recurrence rate. Data analysis was performed with the software SPSS v25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), categorical variables using a Chi-square and Fisher test, and continuous variables using the Student t-test. Results Atotal of 162 patientswere analyzed. 138 patientsmet the inclusion criteria, 41of whom underwent staging by laparoscopy and 97 by laparotomy. Conversions from laparoscopy to laparotomy happened in 2 patients (4.9%) and were secondary to technical difficulties and poor exposure. Laparoscopy had fewer postoperative adverse events when compared with laparotomy (7.3% vs 23.7%, respectively; p = 0.005), but similar rates of intraoperative complications, despite having a significantly longer operative time (median, 175 vs 130 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly lower in laparoscopy versus laparotomy patients (median, 3 vs 7 days, respectively; p < 0.001). No difference in recurrence or mortality rates were observed. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer is feasible and safe. Patients have lower postoperative complication rates and shorter hospital stays when compared with the approach by laparotomy.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2019-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500306Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.5 2019reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0039-1688461info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMouraz,MarianaFerreira,Cátia SofiaGonçalves,SóniaMartins,Nuno NogueiraMartins,Francisco Nogueiraeng2019-06-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032019000500306Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2019-06-25T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
title Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
spellingShingle Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
Mouraz,Mariana
endometrial neoplasms
laparoscopy
neoplasm staging
hysterectomy
lymph node excision
title_short Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
title_full Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
title_sort Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer
author Mouraz,Mariana
author_facet Mouraz,Mariana
Ferreira,Cátia Sofia
Gonçalves,Sónia
Martins,Nuno Nogueira
Martins,Francisco Nogueira
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Cátia Sofia
Gonçalves,Sónia
Martins,Nuno Nogueira
Martins,Francisco Nogueira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mouraz,Mariana
Ferreira,Cátia Sofia
Gonçalves,Sónia
Martins,Nuno Nogueira
Martins,Francisco Nogueira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv endometrial neoplasms
laparoscopy
neoplasm staging
hysterectomy
lymph node excision
topic endometrial neoplasms
laparoscopy
neoplasm staging
hysterectomy
lymph node excision
description Abstract Objective To compare laparoscopy with laparotomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer. Methods A cohort of women with preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging was retrospectively evaluated. The main study end points were: morbidity and mortality, hospital length of stay, perioperative adverse events and recurrence rate. Data analysis was performed with the software SPSS v25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), categorical variables using a Chi-square and Fisher test, and continuous variables using the Student t-test. Results Atotal of 162 patientswere analyzed. 138 patientsmet the inclusion criteria, 41of whom underwent staging by laparoscopy and 97 by laparotomy. Conversions from laparoscopy to laparotomy happened in 2 patients (4.9%) and were secondary to technical difficulties and poor exposure. Laparoscopy had fewer postoperative adverse events when compared with laparotomy (7.3% vs 23.7%, respectively; p = 0.005), but similar rates of intraoperative complications, despite having a significantly longer operative time (median, 175 vs 130 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly lower in laparoscopy versus laparotomy patients (median, 3 vs 7 days, respectively; p < 0.001). No difference in recurrence or mortality rates were observed. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer is feasible and safe. Patients have lower postoperative complication rates and shorter hospital stays when compared with the approach by laparotomy.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500306
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500306
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0039-1688461
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.5 2019
reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron:FEBRASGO
instname_str Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron_str FEBRASGO
institution FEBRASGO
reponame_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br
_version_ 1754115944846721024