Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbero, Edson Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Marchiano, Marcello
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/3020
Resumo: Purpose – This article diagnoses the relationship between the valuepriorities of board members in Brazil and their companies’ identitiestrending towards stakeholders or shareholders. The paper testedfive hypotheses referring to the fact that board members of profitorientedcompanies are more individualistic, while board members ofstakeholder-oriented companies tend to be more collectivist.Design/methodology/approach – A survey was carried out throughthe Schwartz (1992) values inventory with 74 board members in Brazil.The Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) was considered aproxy for stakeholder orientation. The Mann-Whitney test was usedin order to verify if the two independent samples were drawn frompopulations with equal averages.Findings – In partial consonance with previous research, the boardmembers of stakeholder-oriented companies – those participating inthe Corporate Sustainability Index – held less individualistic values.However, for individualistic motivational types, only Stimulation andHedonism were more frequent in companies not participating in theISE index.Originality/value – This result amplifies the predictive power ofindividual values and complements the work of Adams, Licht and Sagiv(2011), which experimentally studied the same relationship withinindividual choices and in a controlled situation. This article enhancesthe theory by incorporating the organizational level into the debate.The results suggest that other factors also influence pro-shareholder orpro-stakeholder corporate orientation.
id FECAP-3_c0712ffbfdb12a2dee3a74e31eb65f40
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/3020
network_acronym_str FECAP-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity¿Interesados o accionistas? Valores individuales de los miembros del consejo e identidad corporativaStakeholders ou Shareholders? Valores individuais de conselheiros e identidade empresarialAxiological prioritiesstakeholdersboard of directorsindividual values.Prioridades axiológicasstakeholdersconselho de administraçãovalores individuais.Prioridades axiológicasstakeholdersconselho de administraçãovalores individuais.Purpose – This article diagnoses the relationship between the valuepriorities of board members in Brazil and their companies’ identitiestrending towards stakeholders or shareholders. The paper testedfive hypotheses referring to the fact that board members of profitorientedcompanies are more individualistic, while board members ofstakeholder-oriented companies tend to be more collectivist.Design/methodology/approach – A survey was carried out throughthe Schwartz (1992) values inventory with 74 board members in Brazil.The Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) was considered aproxy for stakeholder orientation. The Mann-Whitney test was usedin order to verify if the two independent samples were drawn frompopulations with equal averages.Findings – In partial consonance with previous research, the boardmembers of stakeholder-oriented companies – those participating inthe Corporate Sustainability Index – held less individualistic values.However, for individualistic motivational types, only Stimulation andHedonism were more frequent in companies not participating in theISE index.Originality/value – This result amplifies the predictive power ofindividual values and complements the work of Adams, Licht and Sagiv(2011), which experimentally studied the same relationship withinindividual choices and in a controlled situation. This article enhancesthe theory by incorporating the organizational level into the debate.The results suggest that other factors also influence pro-shareholder orpro-stakeholder corporate orientation.Objetivo – Este artigo diagnostica a relação entre os valores individuaisprioritários dos conselheiros de administração e a identidade astakeholders ou a shareholders de suas empresas. Foram testadas cincohipóteses relacionadas ao possível fato de que firmas com orientaçãopreponderante a resultados financeiros tenham conselheiros mais individualistas,ao passo que aquelas inclinadas a stakeholders possuemconselheiros que valorizam mais a coletividade.Metodologia – Empreendeu-se uma enquete por meio do inventáriode valores de Schwartz (1992) em 74 membros de conselhos no Brasil.O Índice de Sustentabilidade Empresarial (ISE) foi considerado como proxyda orientação a stakeholders. Como técnica de análise, utilizou-se principalmenteo teste de Mann-Whitney com o intuito de verificar se as duasamostras independentes foram extraídas de populações com média igual.Resultados – Em parcial consonância com investigações anteriores,as empresas orientadas a stakeholders apresentaram conselheiros comvalores menos individualistas. Entretanto, para os tipos motivacionaisindividualistas, apenas Estimulação e Hedonismo foram mais observadosnas firmas não participantes do índice ISE.Contribuições – Tal resultado amplia a compreensão sobre o poderpreditivo dos valores individuais e estende, entre outras, a publicaçãode Adams, Licht e Sagiv (2011), que estudou experimentalmente amesma relação apenas no âmbito das escolhas individuais e em situaçãolaboratorial. O presente artigo contribui teoricamente ao incorporar oâmbito da identidade organizacional ao tema. A imperfeita convergênciade achados sugere que há outros fatores se adicionam aos valoresindividuais como preditores das orientações empresariais pró-acionistasou stakeholders.FECAP2016-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/302010.7819/rbgn.v18i61.3020Review of Business Management; Vol. 18 No. 61 (2016); 348-369RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 18 Núm. 61 (2016); 348-369RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 18 n. 61 (2016); 348-3691983-08071806-4892reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)instacron:FECAPengporhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/3020/pdf_2https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/3020/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Review of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbero, Edson RicardoMarchiano, Marcello2021-07-21T16:25:33Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/3020Revistahttp://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/indexhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/oai||jmauricio@fecap.br1983-08071806-4892opendoar:2021-07-21T16:25:33Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
¿Interesados o accionistas? Valores individuales de los miembros del consejo e identidad corporativa
Stakeholders ou Shareholders? Valores individuais de conselheiros e identidade empresarial
title Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
spellingShingle Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
Barbero, Edson Ricardo
Axiological priorities
stakeholders
board of directors
individual values.
Prioridades axiológicas
stakeholders
conselho de administração
valores individuais.
Prioridades axiológicas
stakeholders
conselho de administração
valores individuais.
title_short Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
title_full Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
title_fullStr Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
title_sort Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
author Barbero, Edson Ricardo
author_facet Barbero, Edson Ricardo
Marchiano, Marcello
author_role author
author2 Marchiano, Marcello
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbero, Edson Ricardo
Marchiano, Marcello
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Axiological priorities
stakeholders
board of directors
individual values.
Prioridades axiológicas
stakeholders
conselho de administração
valores individuais.
Prioridades axiológicas
stakeholders
conselho de administração
valores individuais.
topic Axiological priorities
stakeholders
board of directors
individual values.
Prioridades axiológicas
stakeholders
conselho de administração
valores individuais.
Prioridades axiológicas
stakeholders
conselho de administração
valores individuais.
description Purpose – This article diagnoses the relationship between the valuepriorities of board members in Brazil and their companies’ identitiestrending towards stakeholders or shareholders. The paper testedfive hypotheses referring to the fact that board members of profitorientedcompanies are more individualistic, while board members ofstakeholder-oriented companies tend to be more collectivist.Design/methodology/approach – A survey was carried out throughthe Schwartz (1992) values inventory with 74 board members in Brazil.The Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) was considered aproxy for stakeholder orientation. The Mann-Whitney test was usedin order to verify if the two independent samples were drawn frompopulations with equal averages.Findings – In partial consonance with previous research, the boardmembers of stakeholder-oriented companies – those participating inthe Corporate Sustainability Index – held less individualistic values.However, for individualistic motivational types, only Stimulation andHedonism were more frequent in companies not participating in theISE index.Originality/value – This result amplifies the predictive power ofindividual values and complements the work of Adams, Licht and Sagiv(2011), which experimentally studied the same relationship withinindividual choices and in a controlled situation. This article enhancesthe theory by incorporating the organizational level into the debate.The results suggest that other factors also influence pro-shareholder orpro-stakeholder corporate orientation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/3020
10.7819/rbgn.v18i61.3020
url https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/3020
identifier_str_mv 10.7819/rbgn.v18i61.3020
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/3020/pdf_2
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/3020/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Review of Business Management
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Review of Business Management
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FECAP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FECAP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Review of Business Management; Vol. 18 No. 61 (2016); 348-369
RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 18 Núm. 61 (2016); 348-369
RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 18 n. 61 (2016); 348-369
1983-0807
1806-4892
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
instacron:FECAP
instname_str Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
instacron_str FECAP
institution FECAP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jmauricio@fecap.br
_version_ 1798942369554366464