Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4103 |
Resumo: | AbstractPurpose – The study investigates incentives in two types of private pension plans in Brazil: PGBL and VGBL. It identifies which one to choose to minimize income tax, considering both progressive and regressive forms of taxation. Theoretical framework – Based on Sutcliffe (2016), the individual decision-making process depends on the taxonomy of tax incentives (Disney & Whitehouse, 1999) and economic effects (Barr & Diamond, 2009; Armstrong, Davis, & Ebell, 2015). Design/methodology/approach – This study used an innovative approach, calculating the actuarial present value gross and net of tax for nominal cash flows, applied to the objective function that minimizes the average effective income tax rate – according to the definition by Fullerton (1984). A simulator was created for the optimal decision of representative individuals regarding the form of taxation to choose, thus reducing the amount of tax payable. Research Practical & Social implications – We advise those with PGBL and VGBL pension plans on the best decision regarding forms of taxation, thus contributing to an improvement in tax legislation. Originality/value – The study’s main contribution lies in calculating actuarial annuity gross and net of income tax, impacted by inflation over time, in addition to calculating traditional variables such as real interest rate, taxable income, deductible expenses, age, sex, and the life table. Keywords – private pension plans, PGBL, VGBL, tax relief, income tax. |
id |
FECAP-3_edc0627efecde6e0d652369f4497c4a2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4103 |
network_acronym_str |
FECAP-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxationImposto de Renda nos planos da família PGBL e VGBL: Análise da tributação progressiva e regressivaprivate pension plansPGBLVGBLtax reliefincome tax.AbstractPurpose – The study investigates incentives in two types of private pension plans in Brazil: PGBL and VGBL. It identifies which one to choose to minimize income tax, considering both progressive and regressive forms of taxation. Theoretical framework – Based on Sutcliffe (2016), the individual decision-making process depends on the taxonomy of tax incentives (Disney & Whitehouse, 1999) and economic effects (Barr & Diamond, 2009; Armstrong, Davis, & Ebell, 2015). Design/methodology/approach – This study used an innovative approach, calculating the actuarial present value gross and net of tax for nominal cash flows, applied to the objective function that minimizes the average effective income tax rate – according to the definition by Fullerton (1984). A simulator was created for the optimal decision of representative individuals regarding the form of taxation to choose, thus reducing the amount of tax payable. Research Practical & Social implications – We advise those with PGBL and VGBL pension plans on the best decision regarding forms of taxation, thus contributing to an improvement in tax legislation. Originality/value – The study’s main contribution lies in calculating actuarial annuity gross and net of income tax, impacted by inflation over time, in addition to calculating traditional variables such as real interest rate, taxable income, deductible expenses, age, sex, and the life table. Keywords – private pension plans, PGBL, VGBL, tax relief, income tax.ResumoObjetivo – O estudo investiga o incentivo de tributação nos planos da família PGBL e VGBL, respondendo: qual a melhor escolha, que minimiza o Imposto de Renda, entre as opções de planos, cruzadas com os regimes progressivo e regressivo?Referencial teórico – A partir da taxonomia de incentivos tributários (Disney & Whitehouse, 1999) e efeitos econômicos (Barr & Diamond, 2009; Armstrong, Davis & Ebell, 2015), foi fundamentada a tomada de decisão individual, baseada em Sutcliffe (2016).Metodologia – Utilizamos abordagem inovadora ao calcularmos o valor presente líquido dos fluxos nominais de caixa atuarial bruto e líquido de imposto, aplicados à função objetivo que minimiza a alíquota média efetiva de Imposto de Renda, cuja definição é obtida de Fullerton (1984). Criamos um simulador para a tomada de decisão ótima de indivíduos representativos quanto ao regime tributário eleito, reduzindo, dessa forma, o valor de imposto a pagar.Implicações práticas e sociais da pesquisa – Orientamos os poupadores de PGBL e VGBL quanto à melhor decisão sobre o regime tributário e contribuímos para influenciar o aperfeiçoamento da legislação tributária.Contribuições – O estudo traz como contribuição principal o cálculo das rendas atuariais brutas e líquidas de Imposto de Renda, impactadas pela inflação ao longo do tempo, além das variáveis tradicionalmente utilizadas, como juros reais, receitas tributáveis, despesas dedutíveis, idade, sexo e tábua biométrica.Palavras-chave – Previdência privada, PGBL, VGBL, incentivo tributário, Imposto de Renda.FECAP2021-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/410310.7819/rbgn.v23i2.4103Review of Business Management; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2021); 388-404RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2021); 388-404RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 23 n. 2 (2021); 388-4041983-08071806-4892reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)instacron:FECAPengporhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4103/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4103/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2021 Review of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeal Martins, Fábio GarridoCampani, Carlos Heitor2021-07-20T22:26:46Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4103Revistahttp://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/indexhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/oai||jmauricio@fecap.br1983-08071806-4892opendoar:2021-07-20T22:26:46Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxation Imposto de Renda nos planos da família PGBL e VGBL: Análise da tributação progressiva e regressiva |
title |
Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxation |
spellingShingle |
Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxation Leal Martins, Fábio Garrido private pension plans PGBL VGBL tax relief income tax. |
title_short |
Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxation |
title_full |
Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxation |
title_fullStr |
Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxation |
title_sort |
Income tax on PGBL and VGBL pension plans: Analysis of progressive and regressive forms of taxation |
author |
Leal Martins, Fábio Garrido |
author_facet |
Leal Martins, Fábio Garrido Campani, Carlos Heitor |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campani, Carlos Heitor |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leal Martins, Fábio Garrido Campani, Carlos Heitor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
private pension plans PGBL VGBL tax relief income tax. |
topic |
private pension plans PGBL VGBL tax relief income tax. |
description |
AbstractPurpose – The study investigates incentives in two types of private pension plans in Brazil: PGBL and VGBL. It identifies which one to choose to minimize income tax, considering both progressive and regressive forms of taxation. Theoretical framework – Based on Sutcliffe (2016), the individual decision-making process depends on the taxonomy of tax incentives (Disney & Whitehouse, 1999) and economic effects (Barr & Diamond, 2009; Armstrong, Davis, & Ebell, 2015). Design/methodology/approach – This study used an innovative approach, calculating the actuarial present value gross and net of tax for nominal cash flows, applied to the objective function that minimizes the average effective income tax rate – according to the definition by Fullerton (1984). A simulator was created for the optimal decision of representative individuals regarding the form of taxation to choose, thus reducing the amount of tax payable. Research Practical & Social implications – We advise those with PGBL and VGBL pension plans on the best decision regarding forms of taxation, thus contributing to an improvement in tax legislation. Originality/value – The study’s main contribution lies in calculating actuarial annuity gross and net of income tax, impacted by inflation over time, in addition to calculating traditional variables such as real interest rate, taxable income, deductible expenses, age, sex, and the life table. Keywords – private pension plans, PGBL, VGBL, tax relief, income tax. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4103 10.7819/rbgn.v23i2.4103 |
url |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4103 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.7819/rbgn.v23i2.4103 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4103/pdf https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4103/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Review of Business Management info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Review of Business Management |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Review of Business Management; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2021); 388-404 RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2021); 388-404 RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 23 n. 2 (2021); 388-404 1983-0807 1806-4892 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) instacron:FECAP |
instname_str |
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
instacron_str |
FECAP |
institution |
FECAP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jmauricio@fecap.br |
_version_ |
1798942370439364608 |