Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Beretta,Filipe
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Shibata,Henrique, Cordova,Rodrigo, Peroni,Rodrigo de Lemos, Azambuja,Jeremias, Costa,João Felipe Coimbra Leite
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: REM - International Engineering Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000300463
Resumo: Abstract The current developments with unmanned aerial vehicles (‘UAVs’) are revolutionizing many fields in civil applications, such as agriculture, environmental and visual inspections. The mining industry can also benefit from UAVs in many aspects, and the reconciliation through topographic control is an example. In comparison with traditional topography and maybe modern techniques such as laser scanning, aerial photogrammetry is cheaper, provides faster data acquisition and processing, and generates several high-quality products and impressive level of details in the outputs. However, despite the quality of the software currently available, there is an uncertainty intrinsic to the surfaces acquired by photogrammetry and this discrepancy needs to be assessed in order to validate the techniques applied. To understand the uncertainty, different surfaces were generated by UAVs for a small open pit quarry in southern Brazil. Well-established topographic surveying methodologies were used for geolocation support and comparison, namely the RTK (real-time kinetic) global navigation satellite system (GNSS) (here called conventional method) and laser scanning. The results showed consistency between the UAV surfaces with a few outliers in when vegetation, water and mobile objects during the flight missions. In comparison with the laser-scanned surface, the UAV results were less erratic surrounding the RTK points, showing that surfaces generated by photogrammetry can be a simpler and quicker alternative for mining reconciliation, presenting low uncertainty when compared to conventional methods.
id FG-1_808179464364e04eccd6be151b82c29b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2448-167X2018000300463
network_acronym_str FG-1
network_name_str REM - International Engineering Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in miningreconciliationtopographyUAVphotogrammetrylaser scanningAbstract The current developments with unmanned aerial vehicles (‘UAVs’) are revolutionizing many fields in civil applications, such as agriculture, environmental and visual inspections. The mining industry can also benefit from UAVs in many aspects, and the reconciliation through topographic control is an example. In comparison with traditional topography and maybe modern techniques such as laser scanning, aerial photogrammetry is cheaper, provides faster data acquisition and processing, and generates several high-quality products and impressive level of details in the outputs. However, despite the quality of the software currently available, there is an uncertainty intrinsic to the surfaces acquired by photogrammetry and this discrepancy needs to be assessed in order to validate the techniques applied. To understand the uncertainty, different surfaces were generated by UAVs for a small open pit quarry in southern Brazil. Well-established topographic surveying methodologies were used for geolocation support and comparison, namely the RTK (real-time kinetic) global navigation satellite system (GNSS) (here called conventional method) and laser scanning. The results showed consistency between the UAV surfaces with a few outliers in when vegetation, water and mobile objects during the flight missions. In comparison with the laser-scanned surface, the UAV results were less erratic surrounding the RTK points, showing that surfaces generated by photogrammetry can be a simpler and quicker alternative for mining reconciliation, presenting low uncertainty when compared to conventional methods.Fundação Gorceix2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000300463REM - International Engineering Journal v.71 n.3 2018reponame:REM - International Engineering Journalinstname:Fundação Gorceix (FG)instacron:FG10.1590/0370-44672017710074info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBeretta,FilipeShibata,HenriqueCordova,RodrigoPeroni,Rodrigo de LemosAzambuja,JeremiasCosta,João Felipe Coimbra Leiteeng2018-06-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2448-167X2018000300463Revistahttps://www.rem.com.br/?lang=pt-brPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor@rem.com.br2448-167X2448-167Xopendoar:2018-06-14T00:00REM - International Engineering Journal - Fundação Gorceix (FG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
spellingShingle Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
Beretta,Filipe
reconciliation
topography
UAV
photogrammetry
laser scanning
title_short Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title_full Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title_fullStr Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title_full_unstemmed Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title_sort Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
author Beretta,Filipe
author_facet Beretta,Filipe
Shibata,Henrique
Cordova,Rodrigo
Peroni,Rodrigo de Lemos
Azambuja,Jeremias
Costa,João Felipe Coimbra Leite
author_role author
author2 Shibata,Henrique
Cordova,Rodrigo
Peroni,Rodrigo de Lemos
Azambuja,Jeremias
Costa,João Felipe Coimbra Leite
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Beretta,Filipe
Shibata,Henrique
Cordova,Rodrigo
Peroni,Rodrigo de Lemos
Azambuja,Jeremias
Costa,João Felipe Coimbra Leite
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv reconciliation
topography
UAV
photogrammetry
laser scanning
topic reconciliation
topography
UAV
photogrammetry
laser scanning
description Abstract The current developments with unmanned aerial vehicles (‘UAVs’) are revolutionizing many fields in civil applications, such as agriculture, environmental and visual inspections. The mining industry can also benefit from UAVs in many aspects, and the reconciliation through topographic control is an example. In comparison with traditional topography and maybe modern techniques such as laser scanning, aerial photogrammetry is cheaper, provides faster data acquisition and processing, and generates several high-quality products and impressive level of details in the outputs. However, despite the quality of the software currently available, there is an uncertainty intrinsic to the surfaces acquired by photogrammetry and this discrepancy needs to be assessed in order to validate the techniques applied. To understand the uncertainty, different surfaces were generated by UAVs for a small open pit quarry in southern Brazil. Well-established topographic surveying methodologies were used for geolocation support and comparison, namely the RTK (real-time kinetic) global navigation satellite system (GNSS) (here called conventional method) and laser scanning. The results showed consistency between the UAV surfaces with a few outliers in when vegetation, water and mobile objects during the flight missions. In comparison with the laser-scanned surface, the UAV results were less erratic surrounding the RTK points, showing that surfaces generated by photogrammetry can be a simpler and quicker alternative for mining reconciliation, presenting low uncertainty when compared to conventional methods.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000300463
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000300463
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0370-44672017710074
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Gorceix
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Gorceix
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REM - International Engineering Journal v.71 n.3 2018
reponame:REM - International Engineering Journal
instname:Fundação Gorceix (FG)
instacron:FG
instname_str Fundação Gorceix (FG)
instacron_str FG
institution FG
reponame_str REM - International Engineering Journal
collection REM - International Engineering Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv REM - International Engineering Journal - Fundação Gorceix (FG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editor@rem.com.br
_version_ 1754734690984525824