Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Beretta, Filipe Schmitz
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Shibata, Henrique Yahaguibashi, Córdova, Rodrigo Peixoto, Peroni, Rodrigo de Lemos, Azambuja, Jeremias Corbellini Brito de, Costa, Joao Felipe Coimbra Leite
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/204386
Resumo: The current developments with unmanned aerial vehicles (‘UAVs’) are revolutionizing many fields in civil applications, such as agriculture, environmental and visual inspections. The mining industry can also benefit from UAVs in many aspects, and the reconciliation through topographic control is an example. In comparison with traditional topography and maybe modern techniques such as laser scanning, aerial photogrammetry is cheaper, provides faster data acquisition and processing, and generates several high-quality products and impressive level of details in the outputs. However, despite the quality of the software currently available, there is an uncertainty intrinsic to the surfaces acquired by photogrammetry and this discrepancy needs to be assessed in order to validate the techniques applied. To understand the uncertainty, different surfaces were generated by UAVs for a small open pit quarry in southern Brazil. Wellestablished topographic surveying methodologies were used for geolocation support and comparison, namely the RTK (real-time kinetic) global navigation satellite system (GNSS) (here called conventional method) and laser scanning. The results showed consistency between the UAV surfaces with a few outliers in when vegetation, water and mobile objects during the flight missions. In comparison with the laser-scanned surface, the UAV results were less erratic surrounding the RTK points, showing that surfaces generated by photogrammetry can be a simpler and quicker alternative for mining reconciliation, presenting low uncertainty when compared to conventional methods.
id UFRGS-2_dd6cbdc43e83a63a159141cc2a05a41a
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/204386
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Beretta, Filipe SchmitzShibata, Henrique YahaguibashiCórdova, Rodrigo PeixotoPeroni, Rodrigo de LemosAzambuja, Jeremias Corbellini Brito deCosta, Joao Felipe Coimbra Leite2020-01-16T04:10:32Z20182448-167Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/204386001106294The current developments with unmanned aerial vehicles (‘UAVs’) are revolutionizing many fields in civil applications, such as agriculture, environmental and visual inspections. The mining industry can also benefit from UAVs in many aspects, and the reconciliation through topographic control is an example. In comparison with traditional topography and maybe modern techniques such as laser scanning, aerial photogrammetry is cheaper, provides faster data acquisition and processing, and generates several high-quality products and impressive level of details in the outputs. However, despite the quality of the software currently available, there is an uncertainty intrinsic to the surfaces acquired by photogrammetry and this discrepancy needs to be assessed in order to validate the techniques applied. To understand the uncertainty, different surfaces were generated by UAVs for a small open pit quarry in southern Brazil. Wellestablished topographic surveying methodologies were used for geolocation support and comparison, namely the RTK (real-time kinetic) global navigation satellite system (GNSS) (here called conventional method) and laser scanning. The results showed consistency between the UAV surfaces with a few outliers in when vegetation, water and mobile objects during the flight missions. In comparison with the laser-scanned surface, the UAV results were less erratic surrounding the RTK points, showing that surfaces generated by photogrammetry can be a simpler and quicker alternative for mining reconciliation, presenting low uncertainty when compared to conventional methods.application/pdfengREM : international engineering journal. Ouro Preto, MG. Vol. 71, no. 3 (Jul./Sept. 2018), p. 463-470Veículo aéreo não tripuladoMineraçãoTopografiaReconciliationTopographyUAVPhotogrammetryLaser scanningTopographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mininginfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001106294.pdf.txt001106294.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain24537http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/204386/2/001106294.pdf.txtdcbca798557c599f9bebd91cb33a6142MD52ORIGINAL001106294.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf3161726http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/204386/1/001106294.pdf4177c52a1676da08a607730d3a443e79MD5110183/2043862021-03-09 04:53:15.614251oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/204386Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-03-09T07:53:15Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
spellingShingle Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
Beretta, Filipe Schmitz
Veículo aéreo não tripulado
Mineração
Topografia
Reconciliation
Topography
UAV
Photogrammetry
Laser scanning
title_short Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title_full Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title_fullStr Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title_full_unstemmed Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
title_sort Topographic modelling using UAVs compared with traditional survey methods in mining
author Beretta, Filipe Schmitz
author_facet Beretta, Filipe Schmitz
Shibata, Henrique Yahaguibashi
Córdova, Rodrigo Peixoto
Peroni, Rodrigo de Lemos
Azambuja, Jeremias Corbellini Brito de
Costa, Joao Felipe Coimbra Leite
author_role author
author2 Shibata, Henrique Yahaguibashi
Córdova, Rodrigo Peixoto
Peroni, Rodrigo de Lemos
Azambuja, Jeremias Corbellini Brito de
Costa, Joao Felipe Coimbra Leite
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Beretta, Filipe Schmitz
Shibata, Henrique Yahaguibashi
Córdova, Rodrigo Peixoto
Peroni, Rodrigo de Lemos
Azambuja, Jeremias Corbellini Brito de
Costa, Joao Felipe Coimbra Leite
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Veículo aéreo não tripulado
Mineração
Topografia
topic Veículo aéreo não tripulado
Mineração
Topografia
Reconciliation
Topography
UAV
Photogrammetry
Laser scanning
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Reconciliation
Topography
UAV
Photogrammetry
Laser scanning
description The current developments with unmanned aerial vehicles (‘UAVs’) are revolutionizing many fields in civil applications, such as agriculture, environmental and visual inspections. The mining industry can also benefit from UAVs in many aspects, and the reconciliation through topographic control is an example. In comparison with traditional topography and maybe modern techniques such as laser scanning, aerial photogrammetry is cheaper, provides faster data acquisition and processing, and generates several high-quality products and impressive level of details in the outputs. However, despite the quality of the software currently available, there is an uncertainty intrinsic to the surfaces acquired by photogrammetry and this discrepancy needs to be assessed in order to validate the techniques applied. To understand the uncertainty, different surfaces were generated by UAVs for a small open pit quarry in southern Brazil. Wellestablished topographic surveying methodologies were used for geolocation support and comparison, namely the RTK (real-time kinetic) global navigation satellite system (GNSS) (here called conventional method) and laser scanning. The results showed consistency between the UAV surfaces with a few outliers in when vegetation, water and mobile objects during the flight missions. In comparison with the laser-scanned surface, the UAV results were less erratic surrounding the RTK points, showing that surfaces generated by photogrammetry can be a simpler and quicker alternative for mining reconciliation, presenting low uncertainty when compared to conventional methods.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-01-16T04:10:32Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/204386
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2448-167X
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001106294
identifier_str_mv 2448-167X
001106294
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/204386
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv REM : international engineering journal. Ouro Preto, MG. Vol. 71, no. 3 (Jul./Sept. 2018), p. 463-470
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/204386/2/001106294.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/204386/1/001106294.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv dcbca798557c599f9bebd91cb33a6142
4177c52a1676da08a607730d3a443e79
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224982390374400