Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screens

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sales,Cristiano Geraldo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Galery,Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: REM - International Engineering Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2022000100037
Resumo: Abstract The sizing of vibrating screen machines can be done by various methods, most of them based on the classic method of Allis Chalmers (ACM). Due to the wide diffusion and applicability, the Peter King (PKM) and Karra (KM) methods present great technical relevance as well. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the results of the screen surface areas, calculated by these three methods, and the real areas of the industrial machines. The study was based on data generated in 11 real industrial screening operations, being possible to evaluate the deviations of the areas calculated by the mathematical methods in relation to the real areas of the industrial machines. Results have shown that although all methods have restrictions on their use, PKM has the smallest deviations compared to the real dimensions of the industrial machines for four screening conditions. All these conditions showed screen apertures from 4.76mm to 19mm, moisture from 2.12% to 3.3%, Gneiss as feed material and deviations smaller than 13%.
id FG-1_91b24eda30c4493dd98c86e135d1da4c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2448-167X2022000100037
network_acronym_str FG-1
network_name_str REM - International Engineering Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screensvibrating screenscreen sizing methodsAllis ChalmersPeter KingKarraAbstract The sizing of vibrating screen machines can be done by various methods, most of them based on the classic method of Allis Chalmers (ACM). Due to the wide diffusion and applicability, the Peter King (PKM) and Karra (KM) methods present great technical relevance as well. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the results of the screen surface areas, calculated by these three methods, and the real areas of the industrial machines. The study was based on data generated in 11 real industrial screening operations, being possible to evaluate the deviations of the areas calculated by the mathematical methods in relation to the real areas of the industrial machines. Results have shown that although all methods have restrictions on their use, PKM has the smallest deviations compared to the real dimensions of the industrial machines for four screening conditions. All these conditions showed screen apertures from 4.76mm to 19mm, moisture from 2.12% to 3.3%, Gneiss as feed material and deviations smaller than 13%.Fundação Gorceix2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2022000100037REM - International Engineering Journal v.75 n.1 2022reponame:REM - International Engineering Journalinstname:Fundação Gorceix (FG)instacron:FG10.1590/0370-44672019750169info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSales,Cristiano GeraldoGalery,Robertoeng2021-12-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2448-167X2022000100037Revistahttps://www.rem.com.br/?lang=pt-brPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor@rem.com.br2448-167X2448-167Xopendoar:2021-12-17T00:00REM - International Engineering Journal - Fundação Gorceix (FG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screens
title Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screens
spellingShingle Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screens
Sales,Cristiano Geraldo
vibrating screen
screen sizing methods
Allis Chalmers
Peter King
Karra
title_short Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screens
title_full Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screens
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screens
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screens
title_sort Comparative evaluation of three classical sizing methods of vibrating screens
author Sales,Cristiano Geraldo
author_facet Sales,Cristiano Geraldo
Galery,Roberto
author_role author
author2 Galery,Roberto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sales,Cristiano Geraldo
Galery,Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv vibrating screen
screen sizing methods
Allis Chalmers
Peter King
Karra
topic vibrating screen
screen sizing methods
Allis Chalmers
Peter King
Karra
description Abstract The sizing of vibrating screen machines can be done by various methods, most of them based on the classic method of Allis Chalmers (ACM). Due to the wide diffusion and applicability, the Peter King (PKM) and Karra (KM) methods present great technical relevance as well. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the results of the screen surface areas, calculated by these three methods, and the real areas of the industrial machines. The study was based on data generated in 11 real industrial screening operations, being possible to evaluate the deviations of the areas calculated by the mathematical methods in relation to the real areas of the industrial machines. Results have shown that although all methods have restrictions on their use, PKM has the smallest deviations compared to the real dimensions of the industrial machines for four screening conditions. All these conditions showed screen apertures from 4.76mm to 19mm, moisture from 2.12% to 3.3%, Gneiss as feed material and deviations smaller than 13%.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2022000100037
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2022000100037
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0370-44672019750169
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Gorceix
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Gorceix
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REM - International Engineering Journal v.75 n.1 2022
reponame:REM - International Engineering Journal
instname:Fundação Gorceix (FG)
instacron:FG
instname_str Fundação Gorceix (FG)
instacron_str FG
institution FG
reponame_str REM - International Engineering Journal
collection REM - International Engineering Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv REM - International Engineering Journal - Fundação Gorceix (FG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editor@rem.com.br
_version_ 1754734691936632832