Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061 |
Resumo: | Over the last decades, the participation of State and non-State actors in law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. Considering the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a focus, this analysis will discuss the potential and limits of Non-State Actors (NSA)’s participation, as ‘friends of the Court,’ in contentious proceedings. The ICJ Statute and Rules of Court contain no provision on amicus curiae participation in contentious cases. The lack of an express mention does not indicate, however, that this practice would be proscribed by the Court. This research applies an empirical methodology for mapping the ICJ’s practices concerning forms of submitting relevant information to the Court in contentious proceedings. Broadening the possibilities for participation would imply the recognition of the plurilateral nature of international disputes, notably when global public goods are at stake. If the goal is to ‘introduce public interest considerations’, then the ‘friends of the Court’ could also contribute to upholding rules aimed at protecting the international community’s fundamental values and, ultimately, strengthening the democratic legitimation of judicial decisions. |
id |
FGV-2_02027179f31566abe14a3bff2835edb0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90061 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?Ampliando o acesso à Corte mundial por atores estatais e não estatais em casos contenciosos: realidade ou utopia?International Court of Justicecontentious casesamicus curiaeintergovernmental organizationsnon-governmental organizationsindividualsCorte Internacional de Justiçacasos contenciososamicus curiaeorganizações intergovernamentaisorganizações não governamentaisindivíduosOver the last decades, the participation of State and non-State actors in law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. Considering the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a focus, this analysis will discuss the potential and limits of Non-State Actors (NSA)’s participation, as ‘friends of the Court,’ in contentious proceedings. The ICJ Statute and Rules of Court contain no provision on amicus curiae participation in contentious cases. The lack of an express mention does not indicate, however, that this practice would be proscribed by the Court. This research applies an empirical methodology for mapping the ICJ’s practices concerning forms of submitting relevant information to the Court in contentious proceedings. Broadening the possibilities for participation would imply the recognition of the plurilateral nature of international disputes, notably when global public goods are at stake. If the goal is to ‘introduce public interest considerations’, then the ‘friends of the Court’ could also contribute to upholding rules aimed at protecting the international community’s fundamental values and, ultimately, strengthening the democratic legitimation of judicial decisions.Nas últimas décadas, a participação de membros da sociedade internacional em processos de tomada de decisões tornou-se uma característica elementar do direito internacional. Concentrando-se na Corte Internacional de Justiça, a presente análise pretende discutir o potencial e os limites da participação de atores não estatais como “amigos da Corte’ em procedimentos contenciosos. O Estatuto e o Regulamento da Corte não contêm previsão admitindo a participação de amicus curiae em casos contenciosos. A ausência de uma menção expressa, no entanto, não indica que a referida prática estaria proibida pela Corte. Essa pesquisa aplica metodologia empírica para mapear a prática da Corte Internacional de Justiça quanto a formas de submissão de informação relevante via amicus curiae em casos contenciosos. Ampliar as possibilidades para participação significaria reconhecer a natureza plurilateral das disputas internacionais, especialmente quando dizem respeito a bens públicos globais. Com o objetivo de “introduzir considerações de interesse público”, os “amigos da corte” poderiam contribuir para a preservação das regras de proteção dos valores fundamentais da comunidade internacional e, assim, fortalecer a legitimidade democrática das decisões judiciais.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2023-09-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e23332317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061/84544Wojcikiewicz Almeida, PaulaTavares Romay, Giuliainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-27T12:39:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90061Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2023-09-27T12:39:14Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia? Ampliando o acesso à Corte mundial por atores estatais e não estatais em casos contenciosos: realidade ou utopia? |
title |
Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia? |
spellingShingle |
Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia? Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula International Court of Justice contentious cases amicus curiae intergovernmental organizations non-governmental organizations individuals Corte Internacional de Justiça casos contenciosos amicus curiae organizações intergovernamentais organizações não governamentais indivíduos |
title_short |
Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia? |
title_full |
Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia? |
title_fullStr |
Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia? |
title_sort |
Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia? |
author |
Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula |
author_facet |
Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula Tavares Romay, Giulia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tavares Romay, Giulia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula Tavares Romay, Giulia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
International Court of Justice contentious cases amicus curiae intergovernmental organizations non-governmental organizations individuals Corte Internacional de Justiça casos contenciosos amicus curiae organizações intergovernamentais organizações não governamentais indivíduos |
topic |
International Court of Justice contentious cases amicus curiae intergovernmental organizations non-governmental organizations individuals Corte Internacional de Justiça casos contenciosos amicus curiae organizações intergovernamentais organizações não governamentais indivíduos |
description |
Over the last decades, the participation of State and non-State actors in law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. Considering the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a focus, this analysis will discuss the potential and limits of Non-State Actors (NSA)’s participation, as ‘friends of the Court,’ in contentious proceedings. The ICJ Statute and Rules of Court contain no provision on amicus curiae participation in contentious cases. The lack of an express mention does not indicate, however, that this practice would be proscribed by the Court. This research applies an empirical methodology for mapping the ICJ’s practices concerning forms of submitting relevant information to the Court in contentious proceedings. Broadening the possibilities for participation would imply the recognition of the plurilateral nature of international disputes, notably when global public goods are at stake. If the goal is to ‘introduce public interest considerations’, then the ‘friends of the Court’ could also contribute to upholding rules aimed at protecting the international community’s fundamental values and, ultimately, strengthening the democratic legitimation of judicial decisions. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061/84544 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333 Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943711210504192 |