Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Tavares Romay, Giulia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061
Resumo: Over the last decades, the participation of State and non-State actors in law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. Considering the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a focus, this analysis will discuss the potential and limits of Non-State Actors (NSA)’s participation, as ‘friends of the Court,’ in contentious proceedings. The ICJ Statute and Rules of Court contain no provision on amicus curiae participation in contentious cases. The lack of an express mention does not indicate, however, that this practice would be proscribed by the Court. This research applies an empirical methodology for mapping the ICJ’s practices concerning forms of submitting relevant information to the Court in contentious proceedings. Broadening the possibilities for participation would imply the recognition of the plurilateral nature of international disputes, notably when global public goods are at stake. If the goal is to ‘introduce public interest considerations’, then the ‘friends of the Court’ could also contribute to upholding rules aimed at protecting the international community’s fundamental values and, ultimately, strengthening the democratic legitimation of judicial decisions.
id FGV-2_02027179f31566abe14a3bff2835edb0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90061
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?Ampliando o acesso à Corte mundial por atores estatais e não estatais em casos contenciosos: realidade ou utopia?International Court of Justicecontentious casesamicus curiaeintergovernmental organizationsnon-governmental organizationsindividualsCorte Internacional de Justiçacasos contenciososamicus curiaeorganizações intergovernamentaisorganizações não governamentaisindivíduosOver the last decades, the participation of State and non-State actors in law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. Considering the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a focus, this analysis will discuss the potential and limits of Non-State Actors (NSA)’s participation, as ‘friends of the Court,’ in contentious proceedings. The ICJ Statute and Rules of Court contain no provision on amicus curiae participation in contentious cases. The lack of an express mention does not indicate, however, that this practice would be proscribed by the Court. This research applies an empirical methodology for mapping the ICJ’s practices concerning forms of submitting relevant information to the Court in contentious proceedings. Broadening the possibilities for participation would imply the recognition of the plurilateral nature of international disputes, notably when global public goods are at stake. If the goal is to ‘introduce public interest considerations’, then the ‘friends of the Court’ could also contribute to upholding rules aimed at protecting the international community’s fundamental values and, ultimately, strengthening the democratic legitimation of judicial decisions.Nas últimas décadas, a participação de membros da sociedade internacional em processos de tomada de decisões tornou-se uma característica elementar do direito internacional. Concentrando-se na Corte Internacional de Justiça, a presente análise pretende discutir o potencial e os limites da participação de atores não estatais como “amigos da Corte’ em procedimentos contenciosos. O Estatuto e o Regulamento da Corte não contêm previsão admitindo a participação de amicus curiae em casos contenciosos. A ausência de uma menção expressa, no entanto, não indica que a referida prática estaria proibida pela Corte. Essa pesquisa aplica metodologia empírica para mapear a prática da Corte Internacional de Justiça quanto a formas de submissão de informação relevante via amicus curiae em casos contenciosos. Ampliar as possibilidades para participação significaria reconhecer a natureza plurilateral das disputas internacionais, especialmente quando dizem respeito a bens públicos globais. Com o objetivo de “introduzir considerações de interesse público”, os “amigos da corte” poderiam contribuir para a preservação das regras de proteção dos valores fundamentais da comunidade internacional e, assim, fortalecer a legitimidade democrática das decisões judiciais.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2023-09-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e23332317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061/84544Wojcikiewicz Almeida, PaulaTavares Romay, Giuliainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-27T12:39:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90061Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2023-09-27T12:39:14Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?
Ampliando o acesso à Corte mundial por atores estatais e não estatais em casos contenciosos: realidade ou utopia?
title Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?
spellingShingle Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?
Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula
International Court of Justice
contentious cases
amicus curiae
intergovernmental organizations
non-governmental organizations
individuals
Corte Internacional de Justiça
casos contenciosos
amicus curiae
organizações intergovernamentais
organizações não governamentais
indivíduos
title_short Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?
title_full Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?
title_fullStr Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?
title_full_unstemmed Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?
title_sort Opening the World Court to State and Non-State Actors in Contentious Cases: Reality or Utopia?
author Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula
author_facet Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula
Tavares Romay, Giulia
author_role author
author2 Tavares Romay, Giulia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula
Tavares Romay, Giulia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv International Court of Justice
contentious cases
amicus curiae
intergovernmental organizations
non-governmental organizations
individuals
Corte Internacional de Justiça
casos contenciosos
amicus curiae
organizações intergovernamentais
organizações não governamentais
indivíduos
topic International Court of Justice
contentious cases
amicus curiae
intergovernmental organizations
non-governmental organizations
individuals
Corte Internacional de Justiça
casos contenciosos
amicus curiae
organizações intergovernamentais
organizações não governamentais
indivíduos
description Over the last decades, the participation of State and non-State actors in law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. Considering the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a focus, this analysis will discuss the potential and limits of Non-State Actors (NSA)’s participation, as ‘friends of the Court,’ in contentious proceedings. The ICJ Statute and Rules of Court contain no provision on amicus curiae participation in contentious cases. The lack of an express mention does not indicate, however, that this practice would be proscribed by the Court. This research applies an empirical methodology for mapping the ICJ’s practices concerning forms of submitting relevant information to the Court in contentious proceedings. Broadening the possibilities for participation would imply the recognition of the plurilateral nature of international disputes, notably when global public goods are at stake. If the goal is to ‘introduce public interest considerations’, then the ‘friends of the Court’ could also contribute to upholding rules aimed at protecting the international community’s fundamental values and, ultimately, strengthening the democratic legitimation of judicial decisions.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90061/84544
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333
Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2333
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943711210504192