The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/968 |
Resumo: | Over the last decades, Intergovernmental organizations have increased their involvement in the process of international law-making. Recent changes also include the participation of new actors and a more influential role of the judicial bodies attached to Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). Having the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a focus, this analysis will address the potential and limits of the participation of IGOs and Non-State Actors (NSAs) in contentious and advisory proceedings. Amici curiae ‘are those actors who do not themselves have a legally protected interest in the particular case and yet want to intervene’, thereby opening bilateral litigation to issues of public or general interest. The ICJ Statute and Rules of Court contain no provision providing for amicus curiae participation in contentious cases. A similar situation occurs as far as advisory proceedings are concerned: there is no express provision for amicus curiae participation. There is no doubt that ICJ procedural law remains outdated and disconnected from the contemporary developments characterizing the international community nowadays. The participation of members of the international society in law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. By applying empirical research methodology for mapping the ICJ practice concerning the submission of relevant information to the Court, this research aims to discuss the limits and the potentials of the available mechanisms for ensuring the participation of IGOs and NSAs in contentious cases and advisory proceedings |
id |
UFMG-21_d2acf7d615a0f40211f85c7d786db0a0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/968 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-21 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice International Court of Justice; participation; amicus curiae; NSA; IGO.Corte Internacional de Justiça; participação; amicus curiae; ator não estatal; organização internacional intergovernamental.Over the last decades, Intergovernmental organizations have increased their involvement in the process of international law-making. Recent changes also include the participation of new actors and a more influential role of the judicial bodies attached to Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). Having the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a focus, this analysis will address the potential and limits of the participation of IGOs and Non-State Actors (NSAs) in contentious and advisory proceedings. Amici curiae ‘are those actors who do not themselves have a legally protected interest in the particular case and yet want to intervene’, thereby opening bilateral litigation to issues of public or general interest. The ICJ Statute and Rules of Court contain no provision providing for amicus curiae participation in contentious cases. A similar situation occurs as far as advisory proceedings are concerned: there is no express provision for amicus curiae participation. There is no doubt that ICJ procedural law remains outdated and disconnected from the contemporary developments characterizing the international community nowadays. The participation of members of the international society in law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. By applying empirical research methodology for mapping the ICJ practice concerning the submission of relevant information to the Court, this research aims to discuss the limits and the potentials of the available mechanisms for ensuring the participation of IGOs and NSAs in contentious cases and advisory proceedingsNas últimas décadas, as organizações intergovernamentais aumentaram seu envolvimento no processo de elaboração do direito internacional. Mudanças recentes incluem a participação de novos atores e um papel mais influente dos órgãos judiciais ligados às organizações internacionais. Tendo como foco a Corte Internacional de Justiça (CIJ), esta análise abordará o potencial e os limites da participação de organizações intergovernamentais (OI) e atores não estatais em processos contenciosos e consultivos. Amici curiae “são aqueles atores que não têm um interesse legalmente protegido no caso particular e intencionam intervir”, abrindo assim o litígio bilateral para questões de interesse público ou geral. O Estatuto da CIJ e o seu Regulamento não contêm nenhuma disposição que preveja a participação como amicus curiae em casos contenciosos. Situação semelhante ocorre no que se refere aos procedimentos consultivos: não há previsão expressa de participação. Não há dúvida de que os procedimentos da CIJ permanecem desatualizados e desconectados dos desenvolvimentos contemporâneos que caracterizam a comunidade internacional atualmente. A participação dos membros da sociedade internacional no processo legislativo tornou-se uma das características básicas do direito internacional. Ao aplicar metodologia de pesquisa empírica para mapear a prática da CIJ no que diz respeito ao envio de informações relevantes ao Tribunal, esta pesquisa visa discutir os limites e as potencialidades dos mecanismos disponíveis para garantir a participação de OIs e atores não estatais em casos contenciosos e procedimentos consultivos.RBEP2023-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/96810.9732/2023.V127.968Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 127 No. 2 (2023): RBEP 127Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 127 Núm. 2 (2023): RBEP 127Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 127 n. 2 (2023): RBEP 1272359-57360034-7191reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/968/706Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWojcikiewicz Almeida, PaulaHühne Porto, Gabriela Tavares Romay, Giulia Gouvea de Oliveira, Mariana 2023-12-30T00:55:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/968Revistahttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/indexONGhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/oairbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br2359-57360034-7191opendoar:2023-12-30T00:55:10Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice |
title |
The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice |
spellingShingle |
The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula International Court of Justice; participation; amicus curiae; NSA; IGO. Corte Internacional de Justiça; participação; amicus curiae; ator não estatal; organização internacional intergovernamental. |
title_short |
The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice |
title_full |
The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice |
title_fullStr |
The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice |
title_full_unstemmed |
The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice |
title_sort |
The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation:: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice |
author |
Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula |
author_facet |
Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula Hühne Porto, Gabriela Tavares Romay, Giulia Gouvea de Oliveira, Mariana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hühne Porto, Gabriela Tavares Romay, Giulia Gouvea de Oliveira, Mariana |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Paula Hühne Porto, Gabriela Tavares Romay, Giulia Gouvea de Oliveira, Mariana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
International Court of Justice; participation; amicus curiae; NSA; IGO. Corte Internacional de Justiça; participação; amicus curiae; ator não estatal; organização internacional intergovernamental. |
topic |
International Court of Justice; participation; amicus curiae; NSA; IGO. Corte Internacional de Justiça; participação; amicus curiae; ator não estatal; organização internacional intergovernamental. |
description |
Over the last decades, Intergovernmental organizations have increased their involvement in the process of international law-making. Recent changes also include the participation of new actors and a more influential role of the judicial bodies attached to Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). Having the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a focus, this analysis will address the potential and limits of the participation of IGOs and Non-State Actors (NSAs) in contentious and advisory proceedings. Amici curiae ‘are those actors who do not themselves have a legally protected interest in the particular case and yet want to intervene’, thereby opening bilateral litigation to issues of public or general interest. The ICJ Statute and Rules of Court contain no provision providing for amicus curiae participation in contentious cases. A similar situation occurs as far as advisory proceedings are concerned: there is no express provision for amicus curiae participation. There is no doubt that ICJ procedural law remains outdated and disconnected from the contemporary developments characterizing the international community nowadays. The participation of members of the international society in law-making has become one of the basic features of international law. By applying empirical research methodology for mapping the ICJ practice concerning the submission of relevant information to the Court, this research aims to discuss the limits and the potentials of the available mechanisms for ensuring the participation of IGOs and NSAs in contentious cases and advisory proceedings |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/968 10.9732/2023.V127.968 |
url |
https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/968 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.9732/2023.V127.968 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/968/706 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
RBEP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
RBEP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 127 No. 2 (2023): RBEP 127 Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 127 Núm. 2 (2023): RBEP 127 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 127 n. 2 (2023): RBEP 127 2359-5736 0034-7191 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1798042217018818560 |