Social function in possessory guardianship of land conflicts

• Autor(a) principal: Dantas, Marcus Eduardo de Carvalho
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
• Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/21439
• topic: OWNERSHIP REINTEGRATION; SOCIAL FUNCTION; AGRARIAN LAND CONFLICTS; JURISPRUDENCE; CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA; REINTEGRAÇÃO DE POSSE; FUNÇÃO SOCIAL; CONFLITOS FUNDIÁRIOS AGRÁRIOS; JURISPRUDÊNCIA; CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA

THE ARTICLE IS A REFLECTION OF DOGMATIC OF CIVIL LAW AND CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW, WITH SPECIAL FOCUS ON ANALYTICS JURISPRUDENCE OF TRF-1, USING SPEECH ANALYSIS METHOD. THE CNJ RECOGNIZES THAT THE AGRARIAN CONFLICT HAS PECULIARITIES THAT REQUIRE THE SENSIBILITY OF THE MAGISTRATES TO THE SPECIFICS OF THIS TYPE OF DISPUTE. THIS IS THE BASIS OF THE NEED FOR ANALYSIS OF THE FULFILLMENT OF THE SOCIAL FUNCTION AS A PREREQUISITE FOR THE GRANTING OF GUARDIANSHIP POSSESSORY, DESPITE THE LACK OF AN EXPRESS PROVISION IN THIS REGARD. IT WAS POSSIBLE TO PROVE THAT THE COURTS HAVE INDEED DONE THIS TYPE OF EXAMINATION,BUT ONLY WHEN ITS RESULT IS FAVORABLE TO THE OWNER. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT AMPLIFICATION OF THE ROLE OF SOCIAL FUNCTION IN THE ANALYSIS OF THE WORTHINESS OF POSSESSORY GUARDIANSHIP MATERIALIZES THE DISTINCTIVE LOOK THAT CNJ HOPES THAT AGRARIAN JUDGE SHOULD HAVE, MAKING POSSIBLE THE FAIR RESOLUTION OF LAND CONFLICTS.