Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social science
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/35206 |
Resumo: | THE PRINCIPAL OBJECTIVE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO ANALYZE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPORTIONAL AND MAJORITARY POLITICAL REPRESENTATION MODELS, ANSWERING A INTRIGUING QUESTION: WHAT’S THE INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN MOST ADEQUATE TO DEMOCRACY? AFTER TO ANALYZE THE PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THIS INSTITUTIONAL DESIGNS ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY, REPRESENTATION AND EVENTUAL REPRESENTATIVE DISTORTION INTO THAT SYSTEMS, THE RESEARCH CONCLUDE WHAT BOTH, MAJORITARY AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION HAVE COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES, BOTH MODELS INCLUDE GENERAL CHARACTERS FOR DEMOCRACY, SATISFYING THE EIGHT INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS TO DEMOCRACY BY DAHL (2005), THEREFORE, THIS MODELS ARE DIFFERENT VISIONS ABOUT THE SAME DEMOCRATIC PATH. FURTHERMORE, IS NOT ENOUGH A READY INSTITUTIONAL MODEL TO GUARANTEE A “GOOD” DEMOCRACY; CULTURAL FACTORS MUST INFLUENCE THE CHOICE OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND BROUGHT CONSEQUENCES ABOUT YOUR PERFORMANCE, LIKE PUTNAM’S (2004) WORK EXAMPLE. THE BASIS OF THIS RESEARCH IS THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVISION OF SCHOLARS WITH IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION FOR THE THEMATIC. |
id |
FGV-2_32b26860b2611d99a36d1083683754ad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/35206 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social scienceModelos de representação: uma apresentação do debate atual nas ciências sociaisMAJORITARY AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATIONDEMOCRACYCULTURALISMREPRESENTAÇÃO MAJORITÁRIAPROPORCIONALDEMOCRACIACULTURALISMOTHE PRINCIPAL OBJECTIVE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO ANALYZE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPORTIONAL AND MAJORITARY POLITICAL REPRESENTATION MODELS, ANSWERING A INTRIGUING QUESTION: WHAT’S THE INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN MOST ADEQUATE TO DEMOCRACY? AFTER TO ANALYZE THE PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THIS INSTITUTIONAL DESIGNS ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY, REPRESENTATION AND EVENTUAL REPRESENTATIVE DISTORTION INTO THAT SYSTEMS, THE RESEARCH CONCLUDE WHAT BOTH, MAJORITARY AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION HAVE COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES, BOTH MODELS INCLUDE GENERAL CHARACTERS FOR DEMOCRACY, SATISFYING THE EIGHT INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS TO DEMOCRACY BY DAHL (2005), THEREFORE, THIS MODELS ARE DIFFERENT VISIONS ABOUT THE SAME DEMOCRATIC PATH. FURTHERMORE, IS NOT ENOUGH A READY INSTITUTIONAL MODEL TO GUARANTEE A “GOOD” DEMOCRACY; CULTURAL FACTORS MUST INFLUENCE THE CHOICE OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND BROUGHT CONSEQUENCES ABOUT YOUR PERFORMANCE, LIKE PUTNAM’S (2004) WORK EXAMPLE. THE BASIS OF THIS RESEARCH IS THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVISION OF SCHOLARS WITH IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION FOR THE THEMATIC. TENDO POR ESCOPO PRINCIPAL ANALISAR AS PRINCIPAIS CARACTERÍSTICAS DOS MODELOS DE REPRESENTAÇÃO POLÍTICA PROPORCIONAL E MAJORITÁRIO, ESTE TRABALHO BUSCA RESPONDER UMA INTRIGANTE QUESTÃO: HAVERÁ UM DESENHO INSTITUCIONAL MAIS ADEQUADO PARA A DEMOCRACIA? APÓS ANALISAR OS CARACTERES MAIS MARCANTES DOS DESIGNS INSTITUCIONAIS REFERIDOS QUANTO A ACCOUNTABILITY, REPRESENTAÇÃO E EVENTUAL DISTORÇÃO REPRESENTATIVA DESTES SISTEMAS, A PESQUISA CONCLUI QUE TANTO O MODELO MAJORITÁRIO OU PROPORCIONAL POSSUEM VANTAGENS E DESVANTAGENS COMPARATIVAS, AMBOS ATENDEM A CRITÉRIOS GERAIS DEMOCRÁTICOS, SATISFAZENDO AS OITO CONDIÇÕES INSTITUCIONAIS PARA A EXISTÊNCIA DE UMA DEMOCRACIA SEGUNDO DAHL (2005), PORTANTO ESTES MODELOS CORRESPONDEM A VISÕES DIFERENTES PARA A CONSTRUÇÃO DE UM MESMO CAMINHO DEMOCRÁTICO. ALÉM DISSO, NÃO BASTA UM MODELO INSTITUCIONAL PRÉ-FABRICADO PARA UMA “BOA” DEMOCRACIA; FATORES CULTURAIS DEVEM SER LEVADOS NA ESCOLHA DO DESIGN INSTITUCIONAL E TRAZEM REFLEXOS SOBRE SEU DESEMPENHO, CONSOANTE AFIRMAÇÃO DE PUTNAM (2004). A BASE DESTA PESQUISA É A REVISÃO BIBLIOGRÁFICA DE AUTORES COM RELEVANTE CONTRIBUIÇÃO PARA O TEMA. Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/35206Revista Direito GV; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2007): jan.-jun. (5); 203-220Revista Direito GV; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2007): jan.-jun. (5); 203-220Revista Direito GV; v. 3 n. 1 (2007): jan.-jun. (5); 203-2202317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/35206/34007Assis, Emerson Francisco deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-11-11T17:29:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/35206Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-11-11T17:29:52Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social science Modelos de representação: uma apresentação do debate atual nas ciências sociais |
title |
Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social science |
spellingShingle |
Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social science Assis, Emerson Francisco de MAJORITARY AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION DEMOCRACY CULTURALISM REPRESENTAÇÃO MAJORITÁRIA PROPORCIONAL DEMOCRACIA CULTURALISMO |
title_short |
Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social science |
title_full |
Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social science |
title_fullStr |
Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social science |
title_full_unstemmed |
Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social science |
title_sort |
Models of representation: a presentation of its topical debate in social science |
author |
Assis, Emerson Francisco de |
author_facet |
Assis, Emerson Francisco de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Assis, Emerson Francisco de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
MAJORITARY AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION DEMOCRACY CULTURALISM REPRESENTAÇÃO MAJORITÁRIA PROPORCIONAL DEMOCRACIA CULTURALISMO |
topic |
MAJORITARY AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION DEMOCRACY CULTURALISM REPRESENTAÇÃO MAJORITÁRIA PROPORCIONAL DEMOCRACIA CULTURALISMO |
description |
THE PRINCIPAL OBJECTIVE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO ANALYZE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPORTIONAL AND MAJORITARY POLITICAL REPRESENTATION MODELS, ANSWERING A INTRIGUING QUESTION: WHAT’S THE INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN MOST ADEQUATE TO DEMOCRACY? AFTER TO ANALYZE THE PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THIS INSTITUTIONAL DESIGNS ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY, REPRESENTATION AND EVENTUAL REPRESENTATIVE DISTORTION INTO THAT SYSTEMS, THE RESEARCH CONCLUDE WHAT BOTH, MAJORITARY AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION HAVE COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES, BOTH MODELS INCLUDE GENERAL CHARACTERS FOR DEMOCRACY, SATISFYING THE EIGHT INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS TO DEMOCRACY BY DAHL (2005), THEREFORE, THIS MODELS ARE DIFFERENT VISIONS ABOUT THE SAME DEMOCRATIC PATH. FURTHERMORE, IS NOT ENOUGH A READY INSTITUTIONAL MODEL TO GUARANTEE A “GOOD” DEMOCRACY; CULTURAL FACTORS MUST INFLUENCE THE CHOICE OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND BROUGHT CONSEQUENCES ABOUT YOUR PERFORMANCE, LIKE PUTNAM’S (2004) WORK EXAMPLE. THE BASIS OF THIS RESEARCH IS THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVISION OF SCHOLARS WITH IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION FOR THE THEMATIC. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/35206 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/35206 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/35206/34007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2007): jan.-jun. (5); 203-220 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2007): jan.-jun. (5); 203-220 Revista Direito GV; v. 3 n. 1 (2007): jan.-jun. (5); 203-220 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943709216112640 |