Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Máximo Sátiro, Renato
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: de Moraes Sousa, Marcos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83763
Resumo: Much has been discussed about the factors that would lead to an efficient or inefficient performance of the Brazilian Judiciary system, and part of the academic discussions regarding the field of administration of justice concerns the performance/ productivity antecedents related to courts and magistrates. In this sense, the main objective of the present work was to identify the determinant aspects of the productivity of the state Courts of Brazil and to test emerging variables that may help in this understanding. From an analysis of the reference literature, the variables already consolidated were defined: workload of the magistrate, amount of human resources (permanent servants and outsourced staff); and the emerging variables: lawyers and conciliators. The inference technique used was the Multiple Regression with panel data. After testing and validating the Regression model and assumptions, the hypothesis that the number of lawyers, the workload and the number of permanent servants and outsourced staff affect the productivity of the courts was confirmed. Finally, the results point in the opposite direction of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) guidelines; it was concluded that the number of conciliators is not related to the productivity of the courts.
id FGV-2_43b21f57a161bfd23895de3af759acc9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/83763
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courtsDeterminantes quantitativos do desempenho judicial: fatores associados à produtividade dos tribunais de justiçaPublic administrationAdministration of justiceJudiciary managementJudicial performanceMultiple regressionAdministração públicaAdministração da justiçaGestão do JudiciárioDesempenho no JudiciárioRegressão múltiplaMuch has been discussed about the factors that would lead to an efficient or inefficient performance of the Brazilian Judiciary system, and part of the academic discussions regarding the field of administration of justice concerns the performance/ productivity antecedents related to courts and magistrates. In this sense, the main objective of the present work was to identify the determinant aspects of the productivity of the state Courts of Brazil and to test emerging variables that may help in this understanding. From an analysis of the reference literature, the variables already consolidated were defined: workload of the magistrate, amount of human resources (permanent servants and outsourced staff); and the emerging variables: lawyers and conciliators. The inference technique used was the Multiple Regression with panel data. After testing and validating the Regression model and assumptions, the hypothesis that the number of lawyers, the workload and the number of permanent servants and outsourced staff affect the productivity of the courts was confirmed. Finally, the results point in the opposite direction of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) guidelines; it was concluded that the number of conciliators is not related to the productivity of the courts.Muito se tem discutido acerca dos fatores que levariam a uma atuação eficiente ou ineficiente do sistema judiciário brasileiro, e uma parte das discussões acadêmicas em relação ao campo de Administração da Justiça diz respeito aos antecedentes de desempenho/produtividade relativos aos tribunais e magistrados. Nesse sentido, o objetivo principal do presente trabalho foi identificar os aspectos determinantes da produtividade dos tribunais de justiça estaduais no Brasil e testar variáveis emergentes que possam auxiliar nesse entendimento. A partir de uma análise da literatura de referência, foram definidas variáveis já consolidadas: carga de trabalho, quantidade de recursos humanos (servidores efetivos e empregados terceirizados); e variáveis emergentes: advogados e conciliadores. A técnica de inferência utilizada foi a Regressão Múltipla com dados em painel. Após o teste e a validação do modelo e dos pressupostos da Regressão foram confirmadas as hipóteses de que a quantidade de advogados, a carga de trabalho e a quantidade de servidores efetivos e empregados terceirizados afetam a produtividade dos tribunais. Por último, os resultados apontam na direção contrária das orientações do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ); concluiu-se que a quantidade de conciliadores não está relacionada à produtividade dos tribunais de justiça.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2021-05-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83763Revista Direito GV; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2107Revista Direito GV; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2107Revista Direito GV; v. 17 n. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e21072317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83763/79391Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMáximo Sátiro, Renatode Moraes Sousa, Marcos2021-05-18T19:47:02Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/83763Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2021-05-18T19:47:02Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courts
Determinantes quantitativos do desempenho judicial: fatores associados à produtividade dos tribunais de justiça
title Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courts
spellingShingle Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courts
Máximo Sátiro, Renato
Public administration
Administration of justice
Judiciary management
Judicial performance
Multiple regression
Administração pública
Administração da justiça
Gestão do Judiciário
Desempenho no Judiciário
Regressão múltipla
title_short Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courts
title_full Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courts
title_fullStr Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courts
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courts
title_sort Quantitative determinants of judicial performance: factors associated with the productivity of the courts
author Máximo Sátiro, Renato
author_facet Máximo Sátiro, Renato
de Moraes Sousa, Marcos
author_role author
author2 de Moraes Sousa, Marcos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Máximo Sátiro, Renato
de Moraes Sousa, Marcos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Public administration
Administration of justice
Judiciary management
Judicial performance
Multiple regression
Administração pública
Administração da justiça
Gestão do Judiciário
Desempenho no Judiciário
Regressão múltipla
topic Public administration
Administration of justice
Judiciary management
Judicial performance
Multiple regression
Administração pública
Administração da justiça
Gestão do Judiciário
Desempenho no Judiciário
Regressão múltipla
description Much has been discussed about the factors that would lead to an efficient or inefficient performance of the Brazilian Judiciary system, and part of the academic discussions regarding the field of administration of justice concerns the performance/ productivity antecedents related to courts and magistrates. In this sense, the main objective of the present work was to identify the determinant aspects of the productivity of the state Courts of Brazil and to test emerging variables that may help in this understanding. From an analysis of the reference literature, the variables already consolidated were defined: workload of the magistrate, amount of human resources (permanent servants and outsourced staff); and the emerging variables: lawyers and conciliators. The inference technique used was the Multiple Regression with panel data. After testing and validating the Regression model and assumptions, the hypothesis that the number of lawyers, the workload and the number of permanent servants and outsourced staff affect the productivity of the courts was confirmed. Finally, the results point in the opposite direction of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) guidelines; it was concluded that the number of conciliators is not related to the productivity of the courts.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83763
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83763
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83763/79391
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito GV
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito GV
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2107
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2107
Revista Direito GV; v. 17 n. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2107
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943710760665088