Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83264 |
Resumo: | This paper analyzes the federalist jurisprudence built by the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF), acting as the Federation Court, in order to complement the existing studies, which are restricted to the concentrated control of constitutionality. The study begins with the empirical research of the civil actions based on the primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) filed between 05/10/1988 and 31/12/2019, which resulted in 2.948 actions, in order to unravel the concept of federative conflict built by the Court and to figure out how it solves the disputes between the central and the states governments. This study describes the jurisprudential evolution of the Federation Court, identifying the parties and themes that are potentially capable of establishing the so-called federative conflict, and compares it with the collected data. Moreover, by reducing the data study to the disputes between the Union and the States, it was identified that the federative conflict, thus recognized by the STF, is essentially a fiscal dispute, which discusses the redistribution of resources from the center to the states governments. Finally, by noting that States are generally the winners of such conflicts, it was possible to visualize a decentralization movement on Brazilian federalism as a result of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. This conclusion not only challenges the majority understanding of the doctrine, restricted to the concentrated control of constitutionality, which affirms that there is a centralist tendency in the jurisprudence of the Court, but also introduces new complexities to be analyzed on the subject of the impact of STF’s decisions on Brazilian federalism. |
id |
FGV-2_7ec203e3330b4c84ad09a9eb1ff81233 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/83264 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO)O STF como árbitro da federação: uma análise empírica dos conflitos federativos em sede de ACOFederalismBrazilian Supreme CourtPrimary competenceEmpirical analysisFederative conflictPublic financesFederalismoSupremo Tribunal FederalAção cível origináriaEstudo empíricoConflito federativoFinanças públicasThis paper analyzes the federalist jurisprudence built by the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF), acting as the Federation Court, in order to complement the existing studies, which are restricted to the concentrated control of constitutionality. The study begins with the empirical research of the civil actions based on the primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) filed between 05/10/1988 and 31/12/2019, which resulted in 2.948 actions, in order to unravel the concept of federative conflict built by the Court and to figure out how it solves the disputes between the central and the states governments. This study describes the jurisprudential evolution of the Federation Court, identifying the parties and themes that are potentially capable of establishing the so-called federative conflict, and compares it with the collected data. Moreover, by reducing the data study to the disputes between the Union and the States, it was identified that the federative conflict, thus recognized by the STF, is essentially a fiscal dispute, which discusses the redistribution of resources from the center to the states governments. Finally, by noting that States are generally the winners of such conflicts, it was possible to visualize a decentralization movement on Brazilian federalism as a result of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. This conclusion not only challenges the majority understanding of the doctrine, restricted to the concentrated control of constitutionality, which affirms that there is a centralist tendency in the jurisprudence of the Court, but also introduces new complexities to be analyzed on the subject of the impact of STF’s decisions on Brazilian federalism.O presente artigo analisa a jurisprudência federalista do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), enquanto Tribunal da Federação, em complemento aos estudos já existentes, restritos ao controle concentrado de constitucionalidade. Parte-se da pesquisa empírica de todas as ações cíveis originárias (ACOs) ajuizadas entre 05/10/1988 e 31/12/2019, totalizando 2.948 ações, para delimitar o conceito de conflito federativo construído pela Corte e como são solucionados os litígios diretos entre União e Estados. Tal estudo descreve a evolução jurisprudencial, identificando as partes e os temas que são potencialmente capazes de instaurar o denominado conflito federativo, comparando-a com os dados estatísticos coletados. Ao reduzir a análise dos dados tão somente às ações instauradas entre a União e os Estados, identificou-se que o conflito federativo reconhecido pelo STF é essencialmente um litígio fiscal, no qual se discute a redistribuição de recursos da União para os Estados. Por fim, ao constatar a elevada taxa de êxito dos Estados, foi possível demonstrar uma descentralização do federalismo provocada pela atuação do STF. Tal conclusão desafia o entendimento consolidado na doutrina federalista brasileira, o qual afirma haver uma tendência centralista na jurisprudência do STF, e introduz novas complexidades a serem analisadas a respeito do impacto da atuação do STF sobre o federalismo.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2021-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83264Revista Direito GV; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): maio-ago. (36); e1964Revista Direito GV; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2020): maio-ago. (36); e1964Revista Direito GV; v. 16 n. 2 (2020): maio-ago. (36); e19642317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83264/79068Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Quadros Dantas, Andrea2021-06-14T14:03:29Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/83264Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2021-06-14T14:03:29Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) O STF como árbitro da federação: uma análise empírica dos conflitos federativos em sede de ACO |
title |
Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) de Quadros Dantas, Andrea Federalism Brazilian Supreme Court Primary competence Empirical analysis Federative conflict Public finances Federalismo Supremo Tribunal Federal Ação cível originária Estudo empírico Conflito federativo Finanças públicas |
title_short |
Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) |
title_full |
Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) |
title_sort |
Brazilian Supreme Court as arbitrer of the federation: an empirical analysis of the direct federative conflicts at the head office of primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) |
author |
de Quadros Dantas, Andrea |
author_facet |
de Quadros Dantas, Andrea |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Quadros Dantas, Andrea |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Federalism Brazilian Supreme Court Primary competence Empirical analysis Federative conflict Public finances Federalismo Supremo Tribunal Federal Ação cível originária Estudo empírico Conflito federativo Finanças públicas |
topic |
Federalism Brazilian Supreme Court Primary competence Empirical analysis Federative conflict Public finances Federalismo Supremo Tribunal Federal Ação cível originária Estudo empírico Conflito federativo Finanças públicas |
description |
This paper analyzes the federalist jurisprudence built by the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF), acting as the Federation Court, in order to complement the existing studies, which are restricted to the concentrated control of constitutionality. The study begins with the empirical research of the civil actions based on the primary competence of the Supreme Court (ACO) filed between 05/10/1988 and 31/12/2019, which resulted in 2.948 actions, in order to unravel the concept of federative conflict built by the Court and to figure out how it solves the disputes between the central and the states governments. This study describes the jurisprudential evolution of the Federation Court, identifying the parties and themes that are potentially capable of establishing the so-called federative conflict, and compares it with the collected data. Moreover, by reducing the data study to the disputes between the Union and the States, it was identified that the federative conflict, thus recognized by the STF, is essentially a fiscal dispute, which discusses the redistribution of resources from the center to the states governments. Finally, by noting that States are generally the winners of such conflicts, it was possible to visualize a decentralization movement on Brazilian federalism as a result of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. This conclusion not only challenges the majority understanding of the doctrine, restricted to the concentrated control of constitutionality, which affirms that there is a centralist tendency in the jurisprudence of the Court, but also introduces new complexities to be analyzed on the subject of the impact of STF’s decisions on Brazilian federalism. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83264 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83264 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83264/79068 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito GV info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito GV |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): maio-ago. (36); e1964 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2020): maio-ago. (36); e1964 Revista Direito GV; v. 16 n. 2 (2020): maio-ago. (36); e1964 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943710713479168 |