Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85607 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to verify the legality of the legal bases used by the State of Roraima in the Original Civil Action n. 3.121, whose requests consist of “preventing the disordered migratory flow from producing more devastating effects on Brazilian’s society, specifically in the State of Roraima”, and that the Federal Union “temporarily close the Brazil-Venezuela border” or “be compelled to limit the entry of Venezuelan refugees”. The case files are analyzed, as well as the applicability of the theoretical-dogmatic discourses used, especially the references to post-positivism and Unconstitutional State of Fairs. The conclusion is that the requests for closure of borders and limitation of the number of refugees must be dismissed, because they directly violate international human rights obligations committed by Brazil, especially those for the protection of refugees (ex vi of the Geneva Convention of 1951 concerning to the Status of Refugees and article 1, item III and article 7 of Law n. 9.474/1997). It is also noted that references to post-positivism and Unconstitutional State of Fairs are made rhetorically, to legitimize the adoption of an activist stance by the Judicial Power. Regarding the methodology, it is a pure, qualitative and descriptive research. The approach method is critical inductive, with systematic interpretation and documentary technical procedures. |
id |
FGV-2_b8fd764b2e976c468839df8375b56a1d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85607 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121Refúgio, fechamento de fronteira e Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional (ECI): um estudo a partir da Ação Civil Originária (ACO) n. 3.121Human rightsUnconstitutional State of FairsPost-positivismRefugeesSupreme Federal CourtDireitos humanosEstado de Coisas InconstitucionalPós-positivismoRefugiadosSupremo Tribunal FederalThis paper aims to verify the legality of the legal bases used by the State of Roraima in the Original Civil Action n. 3.121, whose requests consist of “preventing the disordered migratory flow from producing more devastating effects on Brazilian’s society, specifically in the State of Roraima”, and that the Federal Union “temporarily close the Brazil-Venezuela border” or “be compelled to limit the entry of Venezuelan refugees”. The case files are analyzed, as well as the applicability of the theoretical-dogmatic discourses used, especially the references to post-positivism and Unconstitutional State of Fairs. The conclusion is that the requests for closure of borders and limitation of the number of refugees must be dismissed, because they directly violate international human rights obligations committed by Brazil, especially those for the protection of refugees (ex vi of the Geneva Convention of 1951 concerning to the Status of Refugees and article 1, item III and article 7 of Law n. 9.474/1997). It is also noted that references to post-positivism and Unconstitutional State of Fairs are made rhetorically, to legitimize the adoption of an activist stance by the Judicial Power. Regarding the methodology, it is a pure, qualitative and descriptive research. The approach method is critical inductive, with systematic interpretation and documentary technical procedures.O objetivo do presente artigo é verificar a legalidade dos fundamentos jurídicos empregados pelo estado de Roraima na Ação Civil Originária (ACO) n. 3.121, cujos pedidos consistem em “impedir que o fluxo migratório desordenado produza efeitos mais devastadores à sociedade brasileira, em específico no Estado de Roraima” e que a União “feche temporariamente a fronteira Brasil-Venezuela” ou “seja compelida a limitar o ingresso de refugiados venezuelanos”. São analisados os autos do processo, bem como a aplicabilidade dos discursos teórico-dogmáticos empregados, especialmente referências ao pós-positivismo e ao Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional (ECI). Conclui-se que os pedidos de fechamento das fronteiras e de limitação do número de ingresso de refugiados devem ser julgados improcedentes, por violarem obrigações internacionais de direitos humanos assumidas pelo Brasil, especialmente aquelas de proteção aos refugiados (ex vi da Convenção de Genebra relativa ao Estatuto dos Refugiados de 1951 e dos arts. 1o, inciso III, e 7o da Lei n. 9.474/1997). Avalia-se, ainda, que as referências ao pós-positivismo e ao ECI são realizadas de forma retórica, visando legitimar a adoção de uma postura ativista pelo Poder Judiciário. Quanto à metodologia, retrata pesquisa pura, qualitativa e descritiva. O método de abordagem é indutivo crítico, de interpretação sistemática e procedimentos técnicos documentais.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2022-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85607Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2209Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2209Revista Direito GV; v. 18 n. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e22092317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85607/80782Karolini Burg, AmandaCastilho Gomes, NestorStelzer, Joanadas Neves Gonçalves, Evertoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-25T13:49:00Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85607Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2022-04-25T13:49Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121 Refúgio, fechamento de fronteira e Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional (ECI): um estudo a partir da Ação Civil Originária (ACO) n. 3.121 |
title |
Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121 |
spellingShingle |
Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121 Karolini Burg, Amanda Human rights Unconstitutional State of Fairs Post-positivism Refugees Supreme Federal Court Direitos humanos Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional Pós-positivismo Refugiados Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title_short |
Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121 |
title_full |
Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121 |
title_fullStr |
Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121 |
title_sort |
Refuge, Border Closing and Unconstitutional State of Fairs: A Study from Original Civil Action n. 3.121 |
author |
Karolini Burg, Amanda |
author_facet |
Karolini Burg, Amanda Castilho Gomes, Nestor Stelzer, Joana das Neves Gonçalves, Everton |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Castilho Gomes, Nestor Stelzer, Joana das Neves Gonçalves, Everton |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Karolini Burg, Amanda Castilho Gomes, Nestor Stelzer, Joana das Neves Gonçalves, Everton |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Human rights Unconstitutional State of Fairs Post-positivism Refugees Supreme Federal Court Direitos humanos Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional Pós-positivismo Refugiados Supremo Tribunal Federal |
topic |
Human rights Unconstitutional State of Fairs Post-positivism Refugees Supreme Federal Court Direitos humanos Estado de Coisas Inconstitucional Pós-positivismo Refugiados Supremo Tribunal Federal |
description |
This paper aims to verify the legality of the legal bases used by the State of Roraima in the Original Civil Action n. 3.121, whose requests consist of “preventing the disordered migratory flow from producing more devastating effects on Brazilian’s society, specifically in the State of Roraima”, and that the Federal Union “temporarily close the Brazil-Venezuela border” or “be compelled to limit the entry of Venezuelan refugees”. The case files are analyzed, as well as the applicability of the theoretical-dogmatic discourses used, especially the references to post-positivism and Unconstitutional State of Fairs. The conclusion is that the requests for closure of borders and limitation of the number of refugees must be dismissed, because they directly violate international human rights obligations committed by Brazil, especially those for the protection of refugees (ex vi of the Geneva Convention of 1951 concerning to the Status of Refugees and article 1, item III and article 7 of Law n. 9.474/1997). It is also noted that references to post-positivism and Unconstitutional State of Fairs are made rhetorically, to legitimize the adoption of an activist stance by the Judicial Power. Regarding the methodology, it is a pure, qualitative and descriptive research. The approach method is critical inductive, with systematic interpretation and documentary technical procedures. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85607 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85607 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85607/80782 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2209 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2209 Revista Direito GV; v. 18 n. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2209 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943710869716992 |