Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595 |
Resumo: | This article deals with the Institute of Binding Precedent, analyzing their development requirements, which are provided both in the Constitution and in Law no . 11.471 / 2006, its legal status , as well as the possibility of drawing up summaries of binding effect unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. It also deals with the historical development of summarizing binding effect, mainly in Brazilian law ; and to propose ways to challenge binding precedents of unconstitutional content. You define at what point would competencies invasion and lack of legitimacy of the judiciary by using the sum of binding effect to legislate against the possibility of any precedents materially and formally unconstitutional and the principle of separation of powers. |
id |
UEL-2_871b897a0877dffaedf12411e78c245f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10595 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisisSúmula Vinculante Inconstitucional: forma de controle de constitucionalidade e crise de legitimidadeSúmula VinculanteSupremo Tribunal FederalInconstitucionalLegitimidade.This article deals with the Institute of Binding Precedent, analyzing their development requirements, which are provided both in the Constitution and in Law no . 11.471 / 2006, its legal status , as well as the possibility of drawing up summaries of binding effect unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. It also deals with the historical development of summarizing binding effect, mainly in Brazilian law ; and to propose ways to challenge binding precedents of unconstitutional content. You define at what point would competencies invasion and lack of legitimacy of the judiciary by using the sum of binding effect to legislate against the possibility of any precedents materially and formally unconstitutional and the principle of separation of powers.Este artigo versa sobre o instituto da Súmula Vinculante, analisando seus requisitos de elaboração, os quais estão previstos tanto na Constituição Federal quanto na Lei n. 11.471/2006, sua natureza jurídica, assim como a possibilidade de elaboração de súmulas de efeito vinculante inconstitucionais pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Trata também do desenvolvimento histórico da súmula de efeito vinculante, principalmente no direito brasileiro; além de propor formas de impugnar súmulas vinculantes de conteúdo inconstitucional. Define-se em que ponto haveria invasão de competências e falta de legitimidade do Poder Judiciário ao utilizar a súmula de efeito vinculante para legislar, frente à possibilidade da ocorrência de súmulas materialmente e formalmente inconstitucionais e ao princípio da separação de poderes.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1059510.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p19Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 19-441980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595/10468Martins, Rosemiro dos Reisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-08T19:12:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10595Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2015-11-08T19:12:20Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis Súmula Vinculante Inconstitucional: forma de controle de constitucionalidade e crise de legitimidade |
title |
Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis |
spellingShingle |
Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis Martins, Rosemiro dos Reis Súmula Vinculante Supremo Tribunal Federal Inconstitucional Legitimidade. |
title_short |
Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis |
title_full |
Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis |
title_fullStr |
Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis |
title_sort |
Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis |
author |
Martins, Rosemiro dos Reis |
author_facet |
Martins, Rosemiro dos Reis |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Rosemiro dos Reis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Súmula Vinculante Supremo Tribunal Federal Inconstitucional Legitimidade. |
topic |
Súmula Vinculante Supremo Tribunal Federal Inconstitucional Legitimidade. |
description |
This article deals with the Institute of Binding Precedent, analyzing their development requirements, which are provided both in the Constitution and in Law no . 11.471 / 2006, its legal status , as well as the possibility of drawing up summaries of binding effect unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. It also deals with the historical development of summarizing binding effect, mainly in Brazilian law ; and to propose ways to challenge binding precedents of unconstitutional content. You define at what point would competencies invasion and lack of legitimacy of the judiciary by using the sum of binding effect to legislate against the possibility of any precedents materially and formally unconstitutional and the principle of separation of powers. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595 10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p19 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p19 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595/10468 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 19-44 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305929973301248 |