Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Rosemiro dos Reis
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595
Resumo: This article deals with the Institute of Binding Precedent, analyzing their development requirements, which are provided both in the Constitution and in Law no . 11.471 / 2006, its legal status , as well as the possibility of drawing up summaries of binding effect unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. It also deals with the historical development of summarizing binding effect, mainly in Brazilian law ; and to propose ways to challenge binding precedents of unconstitutional content. You define at what point would competencies invasion and lack of legitimacy of the judiciary by using the sum of binding effect to legislate against the possibility of any precedents materially and formally unconstitutional and the principle of separation of powers.
id UEL-2_871b897a0877dffaedf12411e78c245f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10595
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisisSúmula Vinculante Inconstitucional: forma de controle de constitucionalidade e crise de legitimidadeSúmula VinculanteSupremo Tribunal FederalInconstitucionalLegitimidade.This article deals with the Institute of Binding Precedent, analyzing their development requirements, which are provided both in the Constitution and in Law no . 11.471 / 2006, its legal status , as well as the possibility of drawing up summaries of binding effect unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. It also deals with the historical development of summarizing binding effect, mainly in Brazilian law ; and to propose ways to challenge binding precedents of unconstitutional content. You define at what point would competencies invasion and lack of legitimacy of the judiciary by using the sum of binding effect to legislate against the possibility of any precedents materially and formally unconstitutional and the principle of separation of powers.Este artigo versa sobre o instituto da Súmula Vinculante, analisando seus requisitos de elaboração, os quais estão previstos tanto na Constituição Federal quanto na Lei n. 11.471/2006, sua natureza jurídica, assim como a possibilidade de elaboração de súmulas de efeito vinculante inconstitucionais pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Trata também do desenvolvimento histórico da súmula de efeito vinculante, principalmente no direito brasileiro; além de propor formas de impugnar súmulas vinculantes de conteúdo inconstitucional. Define-se em que ponto haveria invasão de competências e falta de legitimidade do Poder Judiciário ao utilizar a súmula de efeito vinculante para legislar, frente à possibilidade da ocorrência de súmulas materialmente e formalmente inconstitucionais e ao princípio da separação de poderes.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2012-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/1059510.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p19Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 19-441980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595/10468Martins, Rosemiro dos Reisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-08T19:12:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10595Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2015-11-08T19:12:20Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis
Súmula Vinculante Inconstitucional: forma de controle de constitucionalidade e crise de legitimidade
title Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis
spellingShingle Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis
Martins, Rosemiro dos Reis
Súmula Vinculante
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Inconstitucional
Legitimidade.
title_short Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis
title_full Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis
title_fullStr Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis
title_full_unstemmed Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis
title_sort Binding Precedent Unconstitutional : form of judicial review and legitimacy crisis
author Martins, Rosemiro dos Reis
author_facet Martins, Rosemiro dos Reis
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Rosemiro dos Reis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Súmula Vinculante
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Inconstitucional
Legitimidade.
topic Súmula Vinculante
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Inconstitucional
Legitimidade.
description This article deals with the Institute of Binding Precedent, analyzing their development requirements, which are provided both in the Constitution and in Law no . 11.471 / 2006, its legal status , as well as the possibility of drawing up summaries of binding effect unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. It also deals with the historical development of summarizing binding effect, mainly in Brazilian law ; and to propose ways to challenge binding precedents of unconstitutional content. You define at what point would competencies invasion and lack of legitimacy of the judiciary by using the sum of binding effect to legislate against the possibility of any precedents materially and formally unconstitutional and the principle of separation of powers.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595
10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p19
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2012v7n1p19
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/10595/10468
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 7 n. 1 (2012); 19-44
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305929973301248