Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São Paulo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes Toledo, Fabio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Marques de Jesus, Maria Gorete
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83759
Resumo: The article aims to contribute with analyzes concerning the contact provided by pretrial detentions among arrested citizens and criminal justice players, mainly judges, and to what extent this meeting impacts (or not) the production of the decision. The text is based on a research conducted during pretrial detentions in some cities in the state of São Paulo, which featured semi-structured interviews and field observation to build the empirical corpus studied. From the analysis of these contacts, categories were created to describe how these encounters take place. We have defined five types of contacts: eye-to-eye, eyes on the “person of right”, eyes on moral rules, eyes on the screen and eyes on the facts. In spite of the ambivalences portrayed, the pretrial detention represents an improvement by allowing the judge to notice who the arrested person is. However, it is still important that this look can really allow the person to be seen, otherwise, the pretrial detention is likely to become an automated pre-procedural phase of judicial production.
id FGV-2_c7ca87f711c018e50b95a6264a268f80
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/83759
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São PauloOlhos da justiça: o contato entre juízes e custodiados nas audiências de custódia em São PauloPretrial detentionContactLegitimacyJudiciaryHuman rightsAudiência de custódiaContatoLegitimidadeJudiciárioDireitos humanosThe article aims to contribute with analyzes concerning the contact provided by pretrial detentions among arrested citizens and criminal justice players, mainly judges, and to what extent this meeting impacts (or not) the production of the decision. The text is based on a research conducted during pretrial detentions in some cities in the state of São Paulo, which featured semi-structured interviews and field observation to build the empirical corpus studied. From the analysis of these contacts, categories were created to describe how these encounters take place. We have defined five types of contacts: eye-to-eye, eyes on the “person of right”, eyes on moral rules, eyes on the screen and eyes on the facts. In spite of the ambivalences portrayed, the pretrial detention represents an improvement by allowing the judge to notice who the arrested person is. However, it is still important that this look can really allow the person to be seen, otherwise, the pretrial detention is likely to become an automated pre-procedural phase of judicial production.O artigo tem por objetivo contribuir com análises sobre o contato proporcionado pelas audiências de custódia entre custodiados e atores do sistema de justiça criminal, sobretudo com juízes, e em que medida esse encontro impacta (ou não) a produção da decisão judicial. O texto é baseado em uma pesquisa realizada em audiências de custódia de algumas cidades do estado de São Paulo, que contou com entrevistas semiestruturadas e observação de campo para a construção do corpus empírico estudado. A partir de análises desses contatos, criamos categorias para descrever como esses encontros acontecem. Definimos cinco tipos de contatos: olho no olho, olho na “pessoa de direito”, olho na moral, olho na tela e olho nos fatos. A despeito das ambivalências retratadas, a audiência de custódia representa um avanço ao permitir que o magistrado possa olhar quem é a pessoa presa. Contudo, ainda é preciso que esse olhar realmente enxergue o custodiado, caso contrário torna-se mais uma fase pré-processual automatizada de produção judicial.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2021-05-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83759Revista Direito GV; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2103Revista Direito GV; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2103Revista Direito GV; v. 17 n. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e21032317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83759/79387Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes Toledo, FabioMarques de Jesus, Maria Gorete2021-05-13T19:40:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/83759Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2021-05-13T19:40:06Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São Paulo
Olhos da justiça: o contato entre juízes e custodiados nas audiências de custódia em São Paulo
title Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São Paulo
spellingShingle Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São Paulo
Lopes Toledo, Fabio
Pretrial detention
Contact
Legitimacy
Judiciary
Human rights
Audiência de custódia
Contato
Legitimidade
Judiciário
Direitos humanos
title_short Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São Paulo
title_full Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São Paulo
title_fullStr Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São Paulo
title_full_unstemmed Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São Paulo
title_sort Eyes of justice: the contact between judges and custodians during pretrial detentions in São Paulo
author Lopes Toledo, Fabio
author_facet Lopes Toledo, Fabio
Marques de Jesus, Maria Gorete
author_role author
author2 Marques de Jesus, Maria Gorete
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes Toledo, Fabio
Marques de Jesus, Maria Gorete
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pretrial detention
Contact
Legitimacy
Judiciary
Human rights
Audiência de custódia
Contato
Legitimidade
Judiciário
Direitos humanos
topic Pretrial detention
Contact
Legitimacy
Judiciary
Human rights
Audiência de custódia
Contato
Legitimidade
Judiciário
Direitos humanos
description The article aims to contribute with analyzes concerning the contact provided by pretrial detentions among arrested citizens and criminal justice players, mainly judges, and to what extent this meeting impacts (or not) the production of the decision. The text is based on a research conducted during pretrial detentions in some cities in the state of São Paulo, which featured semi-structured interviews and field observation to build the empirical corpus studied. From the analysis of these contacts, categories were created to describe how these encounters take place. We have defined five types of contacts: eye-to-eye, eyes on the “person of right”, eyes on moral rules, eyes on the screen and eyes on the facts. In spite of the ambivalences portrayed, the pretrial detention represents an improvement by allowing the judge to notice who the arrested person is. However, it is still important that this look can really allow the person to be seen, otherwise, the pretrial detention is likely to become an automated pre-procedural phase of judicial production.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83759
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83759
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/83759/79387
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito GV
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito GV
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2103
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2103
Revista Direito GV; v. 17 n. 1 (2021): jan.-abr. (38); e2103
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943710750179328

Registros relacionados