An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24082 |
Resumo: | This paper is a reflection on alternatives to imprisonment and, more generally, on the complex relationships betweenthe concepts of punishment and innovation. For this purpose, we will discuss a concrete example taken from the brazilian criminal legislation, a new drug law disposition (2006), in order to emphasize the theoretical interest as well as the ethical stakes which the concept of penal innovation can underscore. This legislation introduces a hyper-improbable modification of the concept of punishment and it will therefore enable us to develop our arguments along seven points: 1) To describe the legislative modification which will serve as the backdrop to our discussion; 2) To introduce the conceptual tools needed to describe this legislative modification; 3) To enunciate the status that the auto-referential systems theory gives to law making; 4) To direct the reader’s attention toward two historically deviant ways to conceptualize punishment; 5) To introduce some historical markers of the dominantconcept of punishment (with respect to criminal justice); 6) To illustrate the re-stabilization and the generalizationof the dominant or “normal” concept of punishment and, finally, 7) To come back, in conclusion, on the centralconcepts addressed in our discussion |
id |
FGV-2_f82de097b5f6662c3ae1bd77480207f3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24082 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug lawUm caso de inovação "acidental" em matéria de penas: a lei brasileira de drogasmodern penal rationalitypunishmentinnovationsystem of criminal lawRACIONALIDADE PENAL MODERNAPUNIÇÃOINOVAÇÃOSISTEMA DE DIREITO CRIMINALThis paper is a reflection on alternatives to imprisonment and, more generally, on the complex relationships betweenthe concepts of punishment and innovation. For this purpose, we will discuss a concrete example taken from the brazilian criminal legislation, a new drug law disposition (2006), in order to emphasize the theoretical interest as well as the ethical stakes which the concept of penal innovation can underscore. This legislation introduces a hyper-improbable modification of the concept of punishment and it will therefore enable us to develop our arguments along seven points: 1) To describe the legislative modification which will serve as the backdrop to our discussion; 2) To introduce the conceptual tools needed to describe this legislative modification; 3) To enunciate the status that the auto-referential systems theory gives to law making; 4) To direct the reader’s attention toward two historically deviant ways to conceptualize punishment; 5) To introduce some historical markers of the dominantconcept of punishment (with respect to criminal justice); 6) To illustrate the re-stabilization and the generalizationof the dominant or “normal” concept of punishment and, finally, 7) To come back, in conclusion, on the centralconcepts addressed in our discussion Este trabalho é uma reflexão sobre alternativas à prisão e, de forma mais geral, sobre as complexas relações entre os conceitos de punição e de inovação. Nesse sentido, discutiremos um exemplo concreto extraído da legislação criminal brasileira – um dispositivo da nova Lei de Drogas (2006) – com a finalidade de enfatizar tanto o interesse teórico quanto as questões éticas que o conceito de inovação penal pode suscitar. Introduzindo uma modificação extremamente improvável relativa às penas, essa lei brasileira nos possibilitará desenvolver aqui nossa argumentação em sete etapas: 1) Descrever a modificação legislativa que servirá como pano de fundo para nossos propósitos; 2) Apresentar as ferramentas conceituais necessárias à descrição que pretendemos fazer dessa modificação legislativa; 3) Invocar o status que a teoria dos sistemas autorreferenciais outorga à produção legislativa; 4) Chamar a atenção para duas maneiras historicamente marginais de conceitualizar a punição; 5) Indicar alguns marcos históricos sobre o conceito dominante ou “normal” de pena; e finalmente 7) Voltar, a título de conclusão, aos conceitos centrais tratados em nossa discussão.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24082Revista Direito GV; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011): Jan.-June (13); 299-329Revista Direito GV; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2011): jan.-jun.(13); 299-329Revista Direito GV; v. 7 n. 1 (2011): jan.-jun.(13); 299-3292317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24082/22855Pires, Alvaro P.Cauchie, Jean-Françoisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-11-06T14:51:58Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24082Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-11-06T14:51:58Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug law Um caso de inovação "acidental" em matéria de penas: a lei brasileira de drogas |
title |
An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug law |
spellingShingle |
An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug law Pires, Alvaro P. modern penal rationality punishment innovation system of criminal law RACIONALIDADE PENAL MODERNA PUNIÇÃO INOVAÇÃO SISTEMA DE DIREITO CRIMINAL |
title_short |
An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug law |
title_full |
An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug law |
title_fullStr |
An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug law |
title_full_unstemmed |
An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug law |
title_sort |
An accidental innovation case on punishment: the brazilian drug law |
author |
Pires, Alvaro P. |
author_facet |
Pires, Alvaro P. Cauchie, Jean-François |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cauchie, Jean-François |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pires, Alvaro P. Cauchie, Jean-François |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
modern penal rationality punishment innovation system of criminal law RACIONALIDADE PENAL MODERNA PUNIÇÃO INOVAÇÃO SISTEMA DE DIREITO CRIMINAL |
topic |
modern penal rationality punishment innovation system of criminal law RACIONALIDADE PENAL MODERNA PUNIÇÃO INOVAÇÃO SISTEMA DE DIREITO CRIMINAL |
description |
This paper is a reflection on alternatives to imprisonment and, more generally, on the complex relationships betweenthe concepts of punishment and innovation. For this purpose, we will discuss a concrete example taken from the brazilian criminal legislation, a new drug law disposition (2006), in order to emphasize the theoretical interest as well as the ethical stakes which the concept of penal innovation can underscore. This legislation introduces a hyper-improbable modification of the concept of punishment and it will therefore enable us to develop our arguments along seven points: 1) To describe the legislative modification which will serve as the backdrop to our discussion; 2) To introduce the conceptual tools needed to describe this legislative modification; 3) To enunciate the status that the auto-referential systems theory gives to law making; 4) To direct the reader’s attention toward two historically deviant ways to conceptualize punishment; 5) To introduce some historical markers of the dominantconcept of punishment (with respect to criminal justice); 6) To illustrate the re-stabilization and the generalizationof the dominant or “normal” concept of punishment and, finally, 7) To come back, in conclusion, on the centralconcepts addressed in our discussion |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24082 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24082 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24082/22855 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011): Jan.-June (13); 299-329 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2011): jan.-jun.(13); 299-329 Revista Direito GV; v. 7 n. 1 (2011): jan.-jun.(13); 299-329 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943708468477952 |