The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Thorstensen Possas, Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/98
Resumo: This article aims at exploring the construction and the use of the distinction crimes against humanity / ordinary crimes to refer to two "categories" or "types" of crimes, according to the research interviewees: crimes against humanity would be those that violate directly or in an especially aggressive way the human rights and the ordinary or common crimes would be all that do not directly harm human rights. The content of the text is taken from my doctoral thesis, completed at the University of Ottawa in Canada, and the research topic was the legislative creation process in criminal matters, more specifically the creation of the law against torture in Brazil (Law number 9455/97). From an empirical point of view, the article focuses on the analysis on the interviews performed with politicians and human rights activists who participated directly or indirectly in the production of this specific statute.
id RPED-1_e6d2ec61888e7ae70c6ed1041b8eb116
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/98
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishmentA lei contra a tortura no Brasil, a construção do conceito de “crime de lesa-humanidade” e os paradoxos da punição criminaltorturapuniçãodireitos humanosracionalidade penal modernatorturepunishmenthuman rightsmodern penal rationalityThis article aims at exploring the construction and the use of the distinction crimes against humanity / ordinary crimes to refer to two "categories" or "types" of crimes, according to the research interviewees: crimes against humanity would be those that violate directly or in an especially aggressive way the human rights and the ordinary or common crimes would be all that do not directly harm human rights. The content of the text is taken from my doctoral thesis, completed at the University of Ottawa in Canada, and the research topic was the legislative creation process in criminal matters, more specifically the creation of the law against torture in Brazil (Law number 9455/97). From an empirical point of view, the article focuses on the analysis on the interviews performed with politicians and human rights activists who participated directly or indirectly in the production of this specific statute.Este artigo trata da construção e utilização da distinção entre crimes contra a humanidade e crimes ordinários para fazer referência a duas “categorias” ou “tipos” de crimes, segundo os entrevistados da pesquisa: os crimes contra a humanidade seriam aqueles que violam diretamente ou de uma maneira especialmente agressiva os direitos humanos e os crimes ordinários ou comuns seriam todos os que não agridem diretamente os direitos humanos.  O conteúdo do texto foi extraído de tese de doutorado, realizada no Canadá, na Universidade de Ottawa, cujo tema de pesquisa é a criação legislativa em matéria criminal, especificamente a criação da lei contra a tortura no Brasil (Lei nº 9.455/97). Do ponto de vista empírico, o artigo se concentra na análise das entrevistas realizadas com políticos e militantes de direitos humanos que participaram direta ou indiretamente da produção da lei.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2016-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/9810.19092/reed.v3i1.98Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 3 n. 1 (2016): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v3i1reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/98/96Thorstensen Possas, Marianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-07-05T16:24:03Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/98Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:24:03Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishment
A lei contra a tortura no Brasil, a construção do conceito de “crime de lesa-humanidade” e os paradoxos da punição criminal
title The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishment
spellingShingle The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishment
Thorstensen Possas, Mariana
tortura
punição
direitos humanos
racionalidade penal moderna
torture
punishment
human rights
modern penal rationality
title_short The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishment
title_full The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishment
title_fullStr The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishment
title_full_unstemmed The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishment
title_sort The Brazilian anti-torture act, the construction of the concept “crime against humanity” and the paradoxes of criminal punishment
author Thorstensen Possas, Mariana
author_facet Thorstensen Possas, Mariana
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Thorstensen Possas, Mariana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv tortura
punição
direitos humanos
racionalidade penal moderna
torture
punishment
human rights
modern penal rationality
topic tortura
punição
direitos humanos
racionalidade penal moderna
torture
punishment
human rights
modern penal rationality
description This article aims at exploring the construction and the use of the distinction crimes against humanity / ordinary crimes to refer to two "categories" or "types" of crimes, according to the research interviewees: crimes against humanity would be those that violate directly or in an especially aggressive way the human rights and the ordinary or common crimes would be all that do not directly harm human rights. The content of the text is taken from my doctoral thesis, completed at the University of Ottawa in Canada, and the research topic was the legislative creation process in criminal matters, more specifically the creation of the law against torture in Brazil (Law number 9455/97). From an empirical point of view, the article focuses on the analysis on the interviews performed with politicians and human rights activists who participated directly or indirectly in the production of this specific statute.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/98
10.19092/reed.v3i1.98
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/98
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v3i1.98
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/98/96
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 3 n. 1 (2016): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v3i1
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138703048704000