Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Benigno, Gabriel Oliveira Loiola
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Vieira, Diego Mota, Oliveira, Jessica Eloísa de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/83359
Resumo: This paper aims to analyze the gender gap in Brazilian states and the actions of stakeholders of the National Council for Women’s Rights (NCWR). Two research was conducted in two steps. In the first step, a gender gap index in Brazilian states was calculated based on the Global Gender Gap Report (GGGR) methodology, prepared by the World Economic Forum. In the second, the NCWR stakeholders were mapped, and their performance was analyzed, considering the gender gap indexes obtained in the first step and the theoretical framework supported by stakeholder analysis models. The political and economic dimensions presented the worst performance. The Brazilian states with the best general indexes were Amapá, Distrito Federal, and Maranhão, and the worst were Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Paraná. On the other hand, NCWR stakeholders acting in public policies related to the economic and political dimensions do not seem to have great relevance and influence capacity. Evidence indicates a concentration of policy efforts in areas where the country has good GGGR indicators (health and education).
id FGV-4_0cbcfb878f94919b8b0445a6f783f68c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/83359
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s RightsDesigualdad de género en los estados brasileños y análisis de stakeholders del Consejo Nacional para los Derechos de la MujerDesigualdade de gênero nos estados brasileiros e análise dos stakeholders do Conselho Nacional dos Direitos da Mulhergenderinequalitypublic policiesstakeholderpolitical representativenessgénerodesigualdadpolíticas públicasstakeholdersrepresentatividad políticagênerodesigualdadepolíticas públicasstakeholdersrepresentatividade políticaThis paper aims to analyze the gender gap in Brazilian states and the actions of stakeholders of the National Council for Women’s Rights (NCWR). Two research was conducted in two steps. In the first step, a gender gap index in Brazilian states was calculated based on the Global Gender Gap Report (GGGR) methodology, prepared by the World Economic Forum. In the second, the NCWR stakeholders were mapped, and their performance was analyzed, considering the gender gap indexes obtained in the first step and the theoretical framework supported by stakeholder analysis models. The political and economic dimensions presented the worst performance. The Brazilian states with the best general indexes were Amapá, Distrito Federal, and Maranhão, and the worst were Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Paraná. On the other hand, NCWR stakeholders acting in public policies related to the economic and political dimensions do not seem to have great relevance and influence capacity. Evidence indicates a concentration of policy efforts in areas where the country has good GGGR indicators (health and education).El objetivo de este artículo es analizar la brecha de género en las unidades federativas brasileñas y las acciones de los stakeholders del Consejo Nacional para los Derechos de la Mujer (CNDM). Con este fin, se realizaron dos etapas de investigación. La primera se basa en el cálculo de un índice sobre la brecha de género en los estados brasileños a partir de la metodología aplicada en el Global Gender Gap Report (GGGR), preparado por el Foro Económico Mundial. En la segunda etapa, se mapeareon los stakeholders del CNDM y se analizó su desempeño en vista de las brechas destacadas en la primera fase del estudio, a la luz del marco teórico respaldado por los modelos de análisis de stakeholders. En Brasil, las dimensiones de peor desempeño fueron la política y la económica, las unidades federativas que obtuvieron los mejores índices generales fueron Amapá, Distrito Federal y Maranhão, y las peores fueron Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais y Paraná. Por otro lado, los stakeholders del CNDM que actúan en políticas públicas relacionadas con las dimensiones económica y política no parecen tener gran relevancia e influencia. La evidencia indica que hay una concentración de esfuerzos en políticas en áreas donde el país tiene buenos indicadores de GGGR (salud y educación).O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a desigualdade entre homens e mulheres nas unidades federativas brasileiras e a atuação dos stakeholders do Conselho Nacional dos Direitos da Mulher (CNDM). Para tal, realizaram-se duas etapas de pesquisa. A primeira é baseada no cálculo de um índice sobre a disparidade entre gêneros nos estados brasileiros a partir da metodologia aplicada no Global Gender Gap Report (GGGR), elaborado pelo Fórum Econômico Mundial. Na segunda, foram mapeados os stakeholders do CNDM e analisada sua atuação diante das lacunas enfatizadas na primeira fase do estudo, à luz de referencial teórico amparado em modelos de análise de stakeholders. No Brasil, as dimensões que apresentaram o pior desempenho foram a política e a econômica, sendo as unidades federativas que obtiveram os melhores índices gerais Amapá, Distrito Federal e Maranhão, e os piores, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais e Paraná. Por outro lado, os stakeholders do CNDM que atuam nas políticas públicas ligadas às dimensões econômica e política parecem não ter grande relevância e capacidade de influência. As evidências indicam que existe concentração de esforços em políticas nas áreas em que o país apresenta bons indicadores no GGGR, como saúde e educação.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2021-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/8335910.1590/0034-761220190398Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 55 No. 2 (2021); 483-501Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 55 Núm. 2 (2021); 483-501Revista de Administração Pública; v. 55 n. 2 (2021); 483-5011982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/83359/79113https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/83359/79114Benigno, Gabriel Oliveira LoiolaVieira, Diego MotaOliveira, Jessica Eloísa deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-07-06T14:13:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/83359Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-07-06T14:13:52Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights
Desigualdad de género en los estados brasileños y análisis de stakeholders del Consejo Nacional para los Derechos de la Mujer
Desigualdade de gênero nos estados brasileiros e análise dos stakeholders do Conselho Nacional dos Direitos da Mulher
title Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights
spellingShingle Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights
Benigno, Gabriel Oliveira Loiola
gender
inequality
public policies
stakeholder
political representativeness
género
desigualdad
políticas públicas
stakeholders
representatividad política
gênero
desigualdade
políticas públicas
stakeholders
representatividade política
title_short Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights
title_full Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights
title_fullStr Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights
title_full_unstemmed Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights
title_sort Gender gap in Brazilian states and stakeholder analysis of the National Council for Women’s Rights
author Benigno, Gabriel Oliveira Loiola
author_facet Benigno, Gabriel Oliveira Loiola
Vieira, Diego Mota
Oliveira, Jessica Eloísa de
author_role author
author2 Vieira, Diego Mota
Oliveira, Jessica Eloísa de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Benigno, Gabriel Oliveira Loiola
Vieira, Diego Mota
Oliveira, Jessica Eloísa de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv gender
inequality
public policies
stakeholder
political representativeness
género
desigualdad
políticas públicas
stakeholders
representatividad política
gênero
desigualdade
políticas públicas
stakeholders
representatividade política
topic gender
inequality
public policies
stakeholder
political representativeness
género
desigualdad
políticas públicas
stakeholders
representatividad política
gênero
desigualdade
políticas públicas
stakeholders
representatividade política
description This paper aims to analyze the gender gap in Brazilian states and the actions of stakeholders of the National Council for Women’s Rights (NCWR). Two research was conducted in two steps. In the first step, a gender gap index in Brazilian states was calculated based on the Global Gender Gap Report (GGGR) methodology, prepared by the World Economic Forum. In the second, the NCWR stakeholders were mapped, and their performance was analyzed, considering the gender gap indexes obtained in the first step and the theoretical framework supported by stakeholder analysis models. The political and economic dimensions presented the worst performance. The Brazilian states with the best general indexes were Amapá, Distrito Federal, and Maranhão, and the worst were Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Paraná. On the other hand, NCWR stakeholders acting in public policies related to the economic and political dimensions do not seem to have great relevance and influence capacity. Evidence indicates a concentration of policy efforts in areas where the country has good GGGR indicators (health and education).
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/83359
10.1590/0034-761220190398
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/83359
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0034-761220190398
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/83359/79113
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/83359/79114
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 55 No. 2 (2021); 483-501
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 55 Núm. 2 (2021); 483-501
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 55 n. 2 (2021); 483-501
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943774365188096

Registros relacionados