The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6923 |
Resumo: | Generally speaking, great part of the debate in the cultural sector in Brazil has two main focuses. The first one refers to who is responsible for structuring the field: the State or the market. The second deals with the development of a cultural industry as well as its strategic and marketing propositions. This article adopts a qualitative approach to analyze the influences of the State and of the market on the changes occurred in culture’s organizational field between 1920 and 2002. The results show that the more intense is the presence the State in the field, higher is its complexity and its degree of institutionalization. On the other hand, the more the market is present in the field, the more social actors have difficulty in legitimating themselves. Nevertheless, neither the State nor the market are enough to promote significant changes in the logic that guides the configuration of the cultural field in Brazil, which depends on the dynamics of social-historical elements. |
id |
FGV-4_2b5da2818dab0f7fab327e32f795fc5f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6923 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002A influência do Estado e do mercado na administração da cultura no Brasil entre 1920 e 2002culturecultural industryorganizational fieldStatemarket.culturaindústria culturalcampo organizacionalEstadomercado.Generally speaking, great part of the debate in the cultural sector in Brazil has two main focuses. The first one refers to who is responsible for structuring the field: the State or the market. The second deals with the development of a cultural industry as well as its strategic and marketing propositions. This article adopts a qualitative approach to analyze the influences of the State and of the market on the changes occurred in culture’s organizational field between 1920 and 2002. The results show that the more intense is the presence the State in the field, higher is its complexity and its degree of institutionalization. On the other hand, the more the market is present in the field, the more social actors have difficulty in legitimating themselves. Nevertheless, neither the State nor the market are enough to promote significant changes in the logic that guides the configuration of the cultural field in Brazil, which depends on the dynamics of social-historical elements.Grande parte das discussões do setor cultural no Brasil apresenta, genericamente,dois focos principais. O primeiro diz respeito ao debate de quem seria o responsávelpela cultura, se o Estado ou o mercado. Já o segundo, trata do desenvolvimento deuma indústria da cultura e suas consequentes preocupações estratégicas e mercadológicas.A partir de uma abordagem metodológica qualitativa, este artigo analisa asinfluências do Estado e do mercado nas transformações ocorridas no campo organizacionalda cultura no Brasil no período entre 1920 e 2002. Os resultados obtidospermitiram verificar que quanto mais intensa for a presença do Estado no campo,maiores serão a complexidade e o grau de institucionalização dele. Já em relação ao mercado, quanto mais presente este se faz no campo, mais os atores parecem terdificuldades em obter sua legitimação no ambiente. Dessa forma, nem a ação doEstado nem a ação do mercado foram suficientemente fortes para promover mudançassignificativas na lógica que orienta a configuração organizacional do campo. Astransformações nas configurações do campo organizacional da cultura acontecemsomente quando a lógica determinada pela dinâmica histórico-social do ambientedo qual o campo faz parte se modifica.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2010-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6923Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2010); 215 a 237Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 2 (2010); 215 a 237Revista de Administração Pública; v. 44 n. 2 (2010); 215 a 2371982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6923/5490Simões, Janaina MachadoVieira, Marcelo Milano Falcãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:50:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6923Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:50:05Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002 A influência do Estado e do mercado na administração da cultura no Brasil entre 1920 e 2002 |
title |
The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002 |
spellingShingle |
The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002 Simões, Janaina Machado culture cultural industry organizational field State market. cultura indústria cultural campo organizacional Estado mercado. |
title_short |
The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002 |
title_full |
The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002 |
title_fullStr |
The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002 |
title_sort |
The influence of the state and of the market in the management of the cultural field in Brazil between 1920 and 2002 |
author |
Simões, Janaina Machado |
author_facet |
Simões, Janaina Machado Vieira, Marcelo Milano Falcão |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Marcelo Milano Falcão |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Simões, Janaina Machado Vieira, Marcelo Milano Falcão |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
culture cultural industry organizational field State market. cultura indústria cultural campo organizacional Estado mercado. |
topic |
culture cultural industry organizational field State market. cultura indústria cultural campo organizacional Estado mercado. |
description |
Generally speaking, great part of the debate in the cultural sector in Brazil has two main focuses. The first one refers to who is responsible for structuring the field: the State or the market. The second deals with the development of a cultural industry as well as its strategic and marketing propositions. This article adopts a qualitative approach to analyze the influences of the State and of the market on the changes occurred in culture’s organizational field between 1920 and 2002. The results show that the more intense is the presence the State in the field, higher is its complexity and its degree of institutionalization. On the other hand, the more the market is present in the field, the more social actors have difficulty in legitimating themselves. Nevertheless, neither the State nor the market are enough to promote significant changes in the logic that guides the configuration of the cultural field in Brazil, which depends on the dynamics of social-historical elements. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6923 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6923 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6923/5490 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2010); 215 a 237 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 2 (2010); 215 a 237 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 44 n. 2 (2010); 215 a 237 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943765051736064 |