Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theory

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Krieger, Morgana G. Martins
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Andion, Carolina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/16050
Resumo: This article aims to broaden understanding of the phenomenon of legitimacy of civil society organizations (CSOs), interpreting it in the light of the critical capacity theory, proposed by Boltanski and Thévenot (2006). More specifically, it identifies, by means of discourse analysis of representative actorsfrom the field, which are the justifications supporting the action and existence of CSOs, providing them with legitimacy. Having as a basis the theoretical framework and an analysis of the trajectory of the field in Brazil, some hypotheses were formulated: 1) that several reasonings are used in the justifications; 2) that the meeting between these reasonings provokes disputes and conflicts; 3) that it enables constructing footbridges; and 4) that there are predominant reasonings isolating the existence of other ones. Through discourse content analysis of 46 representative actors of the field of CSOs in the Brazilian South region, the hypotheses were tested and we found out that the predominant legitimacy dimensions in these CSOs are the pragmatic and moral, which stimulate the adaptation of CSOs to externally set standards, making plurality and, thus, democracy in the field weaker.
id FGV-4_5997527b74c4b32fffdbf2191eaca091
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/16050
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theoryLegitimidad de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil: análisis de contenido a la luz de la teoría de la capacidad críticaLegitimidade das organizações da sociedade civil: análise de conteúdo à luz da teoria da capacidade críticacivil society organizationlegitimacycritical capacity theorydemocracy.organización de la sociedad civillegitimidadteoría de la capacidad críticademocracia.organização da sociedade civillegitimidadeteoria da capacidade críticademocracia. This article aims to broaden understanding of the phenomenon of legitimacy of civil society organizations (CSOs), interpreting it in the light of the critical capacity theory, proposed by Boltanski and Thévenot (2006). More specifically, it identifies, by means of discourse analysis of representative actorsfrom the field, which are the justifications supporting the action and existence of CSOs, providing them with legitimacy. Having as a basis the theoretical framework and an analysis of the trajectory of the field in Brazil, some hypotheses were formulated: 1) that several reasonings are used in the justifications; 2) that the meeting between these reasonings provokes disputes and conflicts; 3) that it enables constructing footbridges; and 4) that there are predominant reasonings isolating the existence of other ones. Through discourse content analysis of 46 representative actors of the field of CSOs in the Brazilian South region, the hypotheses were tested and we found out that the predominant legitimacy dimensions in these CSOs are the pragmatic and moral, which stimulate the adaptation of CSOs to externally set standards, making plurality and, thus, democracy in the field weaker. Este artículo objetiva ampliar la comprensión del fenómeno de la legitimidad de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC), interpretándolo a la luz de la teoría de la capacidad crítica, de Boltanski y Thévenot (2006). Más específicamente, se trata de identificar, por medio de análisis del discurso de actores representativos del campo, cuáles son las justificativas que apoyan la actuación y la existencia de las OSC, dándoles legitimidad. Teniendo como base el fundamento teórico y el análisis de la trayectoria del campo en Brasil, se formularon algunas hipótesis: 1) que varias lógicas son utilizadas en las justificativas; 2) que la reunión de esas lógicas provoca disputas y conflictos; 3) que posibilita la construcción de pasarelas; y 4) que hay lógicas predominantes que aíslan la existencia de las otras. Por medio de análisis del contenido del discurso de 46 actores representativos del campo de las OSC en la región Sur de Brasil, las hipótesis fueron probadas y se concluyó que las dimensiones predominantes de la legitimidad en esas OSC son la pragmática y la moral, que estimulan la adaptación de las OSC a estándares establecidos externamente, debilitando la pluralidad y, por lo tanto, la democracia en el campo. Este artigo visa a ampliar a compreensão do fenômeno da legitimidade das organizações da sociedade civil (OSC), interpretando-o à luz da teoria da capacidade crítica, de Boltanski e Thévenot (2006). Mais especificamente, trata-se de identificar, por meio da análise do discurso de atores representativos do campo, quais são as justificativas que embasam a atuação e a existência das OSC, conferindo-lhes legitimidade. Tomando por base a fundamentação teórica e a análise da trajetória do campo no Brasil, algumas hipóteses foram formuladas: 1) que diversas lógicas são utilizadas nas justificativas; 2) que o encontro dessas lógicas provoca disputas e conflitos; 3) que possibilita a construção de passarelas; e 4) que existem lógicas predominantes que isolam a existência das outras. Por meio de análise de conteúdo do discurso de 46 atores representativos do campo das OSC na região Sul do Brasil, as hipóteses foram testadas e concluiu-se que as dimensões predominantes da legitimidade nessas OSC são a pragmática e a moral, as quais estimulam a adaptação das OSC a padrões estabelecidos externamente, enfraquecendo a pluralidade e, por conseguinte, a democracia no campo. Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2014-02-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/16050Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 48 No. 1 (2014); 83 a 110Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 1 (2014); 83 a 110Revista de Administração Pública; v. 48 n. 1 (2014); 83 a 1101982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/16050/14879Krieger, Morgana G. MartinsAndion, Carolinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-02-03T13:37:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/16050Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2014-02-03T13:37:46Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theory
Legitimidad de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil: análisis de contenido a la luz de la teoría de la capacidad crítica
Legitimidade das organizações da sociedade civil: análise de conteúdo à luz da teoria da capacidade crítica
title Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theory
spellingShingle Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theory
Krieger, Morgana G. Martins
civil society organization
legitimacy
critical capacity theory
democracy.
organización de la sociedad civil
legitimidad
teoría de la capacidad crítica
democracia.
organização da sociedade civil
legitimidade
teoria da capacidade crítica
democracia.
title_short Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theory
title_full Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theory
title_fullStr Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theory
title_full_unstemmed Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theory
title_sort Legitimacy of civil society organizations: content analysis in the light of the critical capacity theory
author Krieger, Morgana G. Martins
author_facet Krieger, Morgana G. Martins
Andion, Carolina
author_role author
author2 Andion, Carolina
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Krieger, Morgana G. Martins
Andion, Carolina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv civil society organization
legitimacy
critical capacity theory
democracy.
organización de la sociedad civil
legitimidad
teoría de la capacidad crítica
democracia.
organização da sociedade civil
legitimidade
teoria da capacidade crítica
democracia.
topic civil society organization
legitimacy
critical capacity theory
democracy.
organización de la sociedad civil
legitimidad
teoría de la capacidad crítica
democracia.
organização da sociedade civil
legitimidade
teoria da capacidade crítica
democracia.
description This article aims to broaden understanding of the phenomenon of legitimacy of civil society organizations (CSOs), interpreting it in the light of the critical capacity theory, proposed by Boltanski and Thévenot (2006). More specifically, it identifies, by means of discourse analysis of representative actorsfrom the field, which are the justifications supporting the action and existence of CSOs, providing them with legitimacy. Having as a basis the theoretical framework and an analysis of the trajectory of the field in Brazil, some hypotheses were formulated: 1) that several reasonings are used in the justifications; 2) that the meeting between these reasonings provokes disputes and conflicts; 3) that it enables constructing footbridges; and 4) that there are predominant reasonings isolating the existence of other ones. Through discourse content analysis of 46 representative actors of the field of CSOs in the Brazilian South region, the hypotheses were tested and we found out that the predominant legitimacy dimensions in these CSOs are the pragmatic and moral, which stimulate the adaptation of CSOs to externally set standards, making plurality and, thus, democracy in the field weaker.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-02-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/16050
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/16050
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/16050/14879
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 48 No. 1 (2014); 83 a 110
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 1 (2014); 83 a 110
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 48 n. 1 (2014); 83 a 110
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943771374649344